November 2017 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1321551] New: RFE: Recommend some specific general purpose font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321551 Bug ID: 1321551 Summary: RFE: Recommend some specific general purpose font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: ville.skytta(a)iki.fi QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Currently fontconfig has a dependency on font(:lang=en). For minimal setups where fontconfig is involved in that don't specify anything more specific than that, it results in getting the first satisfying package by alphabetical sort order to be installed. At the moment that is aajohan-comfortaa-fonts, which is not a very good default, and could change based on what names of packages are available. Instead, I suggest adding (in addition to the existing hard dependency on font(:lang=en)) a Recommends that would by default (with dnf) pull in something that is a better default and already a default in common Fedora installations, such as abattis-cantarell-fonts which AFAIK is the default for GNOME. Some other potential candidates would be liberation-sans-fonts and dejavu-sans-fonts. Not sure if Suggests would work for this purpose, or if it needs to be Recommends. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 10 months

2
2
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1474422] New: [abrt] ibus: ffi_call_unix64(): ibus-x11 killed by signal 11

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474422 Bug ID: 1474422 Summary: [abrt] ibus: ffi_call_unix64(): ibus-x11 killed by signal 11 Product: Fedora Version: 26 Component: ibus Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Reporter: wd(a)denx.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, smaitra(a)redhat.com, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Fresh install of Fedora 26. Then installed the FVWMpackage. Rebootet and tried to log in using "fvwm" as window manager option. Zero other activities. Version-Release number of selected component: ibus-1.5.16-2.fc26 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.9.1 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: /usr/libexec/ibus-x11 --kill-daemon crash_function: ffi_call_unix64 executable: /usr/libexec/ibus-x11 journald_cursor: s=081922fbe12a436c99bf0ca7fce84f90;i=13f6;b=e2981484247f4c3ebebbefed1ee8bb6e;m=11dc8ca3;t=5551155385856;x=d48075e2c4636bb3 kernel: 4.11.8-300.fc26.x86_64 rootdir: / runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 11 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1444357] New: [abrt] ibus: gtk_widget_translate_coordinates(): ibus-ui-emojier killed by signal 11

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444357 Bug ID: 1444357 Summary: [abrt] ibus: gtk_widget_translate_coordinates(): ibus-ui-emojier killed by signal 11 Product: Fedora Version: 26 Component: ibus Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Reporter: mfabian(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, smaitra(a)redhat.com, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component: ibus-1.5.15-7.fc26 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.9.1 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: /usr/libexec/ibus-ui-emojier crash_function: gtk_widget_translate_coordinates executable: /usr/libexec/ibus-ui-emojier journald_cursor: s=664b04056b90495eb16b01faf8679d24;i=50ac;b=49987fadbf444363972d43c8efe305d9;m=8c993bfce1;t=54c68c07c4671;x=2b461df22db5e7cb kernel: 4.11.0-0.rc3.git0.2.fc26.x86_64 rootdir: / runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (10 frames) #0 gtk_widget_translate_coordinates at gtkwidget.c:6292 #1 _update_widget_coordinates at gtkgesture.c:504 #2 _gtk_gesture_update_point at gtkgesture.c:611 #3 gtk_gesture_handle_event at gtkgesture.c:740 #4 gtk_gesture_single_handle_event at gtkgesturesingle.c:222 #5 gtk_event_controller_handle_event at gtkeventcontroller.c:230 #6 controller_handle_wm_event at gtkwindow.c:8071 #7 gtk_window_handle_wm_event at gtkwindow.c:8100 #8 _gtk_window_check_handle_wm_event at gtkwindow.c:8138 #9 gtk_main_do_event at gtkmain.c:1748 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 11 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 657849] New: Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657849 Summary: Serbian glyphs for Wikipedia Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: alessandroceschini.it(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Hy, at the Serbian Wikipedia we are planning on supporting localized Serbian glyphs (as opposed to standard/Russian ones) on screen by taking advantage of the next generation of browser (like Firefox 4) compliant with OpenType features. What we lack is a pool of free OpenType fonts with Serbian glyphs to be accessed through the locl feature. DejaVu is, as far as I know, the only free font which does so (although with some bugs) but, particularly the Serif version, can be described as ugly at best. So, what about a new release of Liberation Fonts containing a locl table for Serbian? Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

5 years, 11 months

2
113
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1515436] New: gnome-shell crashes with attached stacktrace: FcConfigEvaluate at top of stack.

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1515436 Bug ID: 1515436 Summary: gnome-shell crashes with attached stacktrace: FcConfigEvaluate at top of stack. Product: Fedora Version: 26 Component: fontconfig Severity: high Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: ndokos(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1356104 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1356104&action=edit stacktrace of gnome-shell crash. Description of problem: I run Fedora 26 on a Lenovo Thinkpad W541. I ran a "dnf update" last Friday (2017-11-17) and after the update I could not login with any Gnome choice: Gnome, Gnome Classic, or Gnome on X11 - after a couple of burps on the display, it would return to the login prompt. I installed the cinnamon desktop and was able to log in with that. It turns out that gnome-shell crashes in FcConfigEvaluate - see attached stacktrace. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig.x86_64 2.12.6-4.fc26 @updates How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. dnf update 2. reboot 3. login Actual results: Churn a bit and then return to the login screen. Expected results: Successful login. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years

1
5
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1474257] New: fc-cache in multilib does not create 32bit cache files

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474257 Bug ID: 1474257 Summary: fc-cache in multilib does not create 32bit cache files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Blocks: 1468978 Description of problem: On 64bit env, there are no way to generate {be,le}32d{4,8} caches unless removing 64bit version of packages because the 32bit version of fc-cache binary is hidden by the package manager. need to have separate binary to address like gtk does. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468978 [Bug 1468978] fc-cache in multilib does not create 32bit cache files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years

1
2
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1511237] New: fcitx-4.2.9.5 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511237 Bug ID: 1511237 Summary: fcitx-4.2.9.5 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fcitx Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: liangsuilong(a)gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i(a)cicku.me, liangsuilong(a)gmail.com, pwu(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 4.2.9.5 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.2.9.4-1.fc28 URL: https://fcitx-im.org/wiki/Fcitx Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/8004/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years

1
8
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1450802] New: @sinhala-suppport group: please change the default font from LKLUG to Noto

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450802 Bug ID: 1450802 Summary: @sinhala-suppport group: please change the default font from LKLUG to Noto Product: Fedora Version: 25 Component: google-noto-fonts Severity: low Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: harshula(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com [This BZ should be filed against the @sinhala-support group.] Description of problem: Please change the default font from LKLUG to Noto for the Sinhala script. The LKLUG font is viewed as deprecated and we've been trying to encourage other fonts that can succeed as the default Sinhala font on GNU/Linux. At this stage the Noto Sinhala range, in fonts-noto-hinted, is a more appropriate default font than LKLUG. See the discussion here: http://sourceforge.net/p/sinhala/mailman/message/34481529/ See Debian Bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837969 Thanks, # -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years

1
18
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 882841] New: can we update this hunspell-mr wordlist?

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882841 Bug ID: 882841 Summary: can we update this hunspell-mr wordlist? Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: hunspell-mr Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: psatpute(a)redhat.com Description of problem: -> From upstream url http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Dictionaries, which points to http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/project/dict-mr i found -> http://code.google.com/p/hunspell-marathi-dictionary/ This is latest and has more words (1,00,000) compared to our existing (12,631) upstream. Can we update this? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years

2
9
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1409717] New: Language writing not applicable in other-user windows

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409717 Bug ID: 1409717 Summary: Language writing not applicable in other-user windows Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ibus-m17n Severity: high Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: moceap(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com Description of problem: Language writing not applicable in other-user windows Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.3.4-21.fc25 How reproducible: Run other-user window Steps to Reproduce: 1. open window of other-user like (su -c gedit) Actual results: Typing m17n kb Expected results: not switcched to m17n -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

6 years

2
4
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs November 2017