i18n-bugs November 2020

i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
65 discussions

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1879106] New: In add input source "SEARCH" for input not working properly.
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 11 May '21

11 May '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879106 Bug ID: 1879106 Summary: In add input source "SEARCH" for input not working properly. Product: Fedora Version: 33 Status: NEW Component: ibus Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Reporter: prigupta(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mfabian(a)redhat.com, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1714925 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1714925&action=edit screen cast for adding input source from search Description of problem: The search option in "add input source" is not working properly. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora-33 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.Go to the settings --> region and language -- > input sources 2.Go to add input source(+) 3.try to search(:) some language specific input source. For example hangul(Korean), Intelligent pinyin(Chinese) , typing booster, Cangjie(chinese hong kong) Actual results: 1. Search will work for some input sources like typing booster( it will give "other") but it does not work for some input like hangul. intelligent pinyin, cangjie etc Expected results:The search should give proper results for all. Additional info:Attaching Screencast for more description. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1711646] New: Scriptlet error when updating through SSH
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 09 May '21

09 May '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711646 Bug ID: 1711646 Summary: Scriptlet error when updating through SSH Product: Fedora Version: 30 Status: NEW Component: ibus Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Reporter: dreua(a)posteo.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When I update or reinstall ibus-1.5.20-4.fc30 over SSH, dnf outputs the error "X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication.". This is caused by https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ibus/blob/master/f/ibus.spec#_338 running `sudo ibus write-cache --system` results in the same error when called over SSH. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-1.5.20-4.fc30 How reproducible: Always over SSH, never when using the terminal directly on the machine. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Reinstall or update to ibus-1.5.20-4.fc30 Actual results: Running scriptlet: ibus-1.5.20-4.fc30.x86_64 X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. Verifying : ibus-1.5.20-4.fc30.x86_64 Expected results: Running scriptlet: ibus-1.5.20-4.fc30.x86_64 Verifying : ibus-1.5.20-4.fc30.x86_64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 22

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1899847] New: update to v2.7-NotoSlimVF
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 19 Apr '21

19 Apr '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899847 Bug ID: 1899847 Summary: update to v2.7-NotoSlimVF Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: google-noto-fonts Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Version 2.6 and 2.7 with Slim VF fonts were released in 2019: https://github.com/googlefonts/noto-fonts/releases It would be good to update Fedora to them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1749943] New: pango contain header with wrong hb.h include
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749943 Bug ID: 1749943 Summary: pango contain header with wrong hb.h include Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: pango Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: vascom2(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I am try to build eiskaltdcpp and it fsilrd with error: BUILDSTDERR: /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pango-coverage.h:28:10: fatal error: hb.h: No such file or directory BUILDSTDERR: 28 | #include <hb.h> BUILDSTDERR: | ^~~~~~ Full build log https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/5226/37235226/build.log Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-1.44.6-1.fc32 How reproducible: Always. As I see this line was added in pango 1.44. But harfbuzz's hb.h in Fedora placed at /usr/include/harfbuzz/ Need to solve it for build other packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1807534] New: pyzy requires Python 2 to build
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 18 Jan '21

18 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807534 Bug ID: 1807534 Summary: pyzy requires Python 2 to build Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: pyzy Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com Reporter: pviktori(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com Blocks: 1803205 (BRPY27) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Python 2 reached upstream end-of-life in January 2020. In Fedora Rawhide, it's now provided from the compat package `python27`. Packages that only use Python 2 at build time, like pyzy, had a general exception to keep using it in Fedora 31. Now, the dependency should be removed. Let us know if you need any help investigating or removing the dependency. (There are dozens of packages like this, so we didn't investigate this one thoroughly. We assume you know the package best.) If it's possible that the dependency won't be removed in Fedora 33. Please request a FESCo exception. You can refer to the exception for mercurial as an example: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2243 It's good to mention: - What is the reason for the Python 2 build dependency? - What are the upstream/community plans/timelines regarding Python 2? - What is the guidance for porting the build to Python 3? (Assuming that there is someone who generally knows how to port to Python 3, but doesn't know anything about the particular package, what are the next steps to take?) If you need anything from us, or something is unclear, please mention it here. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803205 [Bug 1803205] Tracking: Packages BuildRequiring python27 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1707001] New: Ibus-pinyin ERROR
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Jan '21

12 Jan '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707001 Bug ID: 1707001 Summary: Ibus-pinyin ERROR Product: Fedora Version: 30 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: ibus-pinyin Severity: urgent Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com Reporter: 1990konger(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pwu(a)redhat.com, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The input method is incorrect and cannot be recognized correctly. The text to be entered is required. For example, 'nihao' should be right, '你好'. Now enter 'nihao' to show 'niha o'.Unrecognized what you need 'ni' is a word. 'hao' is a word. 'ha' is a word but the display is wrong at this time and cannot be selected. Unable to recognize 'hao'. Affect all input suggestions to withdraw to the old version Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Name : ibus-pinyin Version : 1.5.0 Release : 16.fc30 How reproducible: 'nihao' is meaning is 'Hello' 'niha o', it is an error Steps to Reproduce: 1.All Chinese input is wrong Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1902881] New: Fallback font in fontconfig 2.13.93 is Montserrat, previously was DejaVu
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 14 Dec '20

14 Dec '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902881 Bug ID: 1902881 Summary: Fallback font in fontconfig 2.13.93 is Montserrat, previously was DejaVu Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Severity: medium Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: awilliam(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora I'm still trying to figure out exactly what's going on here, but with fontconfig-2.13.92-12.fc33 , if you do "fc-match ashjopasdjhao" - just any random non-existent string - you get "DejaVuSans.ttf: "DejaVu Sans" "Regular"". If you do the same on fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34, you get "Montserrat-Regular.otf: "Montserrat" "Regular"". I *think* this is why KDE window titles look different with 2.13.93 vs. 2.13.92 - this is breaking some KDE tests in openQA. KDE window titles are set to use "Noto Sans", but that font is not actually installed by default. So I think they wind up just falling back. There's another odd discrepancy I noted: on 2.13.92, "fc-match sans-serif" gives DejaVu Sans Regular, while on 2.13.93 it gives DejaVu Sans Book. I'm not sure whether that's related or what's causing it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 22

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1902413] New: couldn't upgrade fontconfig from 2.13.92-12.fc33 to 2.13.93-1.fc34 because x86_64 conflicted with i686
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 01 Dec '20

01 Dec '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902413 Bug ID: 1902413 Summary: couldn't upgrade fontconfig from 2.13.92-12.fc33 to 2.13.93-1.fc34 because x86_64 conflicted with i686 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: mikhail.v.gavrilov(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: couldn't upgrade fontconfig from 2.13.92-12.fc33 to 2.13.93-1.fc34 because x86_64 conflicted with i686, but i686 version is needed for steam and wine # rpm -qa | grep fontconfig fontconfig-2.13.92-12.fc33.x86_64 fontconfig-2.13.92-12.fc33.i686 # dnf upgrade fontconfig Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:07 ago on Sat 28 Nov 2020 09:32:37 PM +05. Dependencies resolved. =============================================================================== Package Architecture Version Repository Size =============================================================================== Upgrading: fontconfig i686 2.13.93-1.fc34 rawhide 285 k fontconfig x86_64 2.13.93-1.fc34 rawhide 274 k Transaction Summary =============================================================================== Upgrade 2 Packages Total size: 559 k Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: [SKIPPED] fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34.i686.rpm: Already downloaded [SKIPPED] fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/share/doc/fontconfig/fontconfig-user.txt conflicts between attempted installs of fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34.i686 and fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34.x86_64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1902365] New: fontconfig-2.13.93 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Nov '20

30 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902365 Bug ID: 1902365 Summary: fontconfig-2.13.93 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 2.13.93 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.13.92-12.fc33 URL: https://www.fontconfig.org/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/827/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1902510] New: File conflict on update fontconfig-user.txt
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Nov '20

30 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902510 Bug ID: 1902510 Summary: File conflict on update fontconfig-user.txt Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: bbchallenger100(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora ==Description of problem: Fontconfig can't install both x64 and x32 versions without having a conflict. ==Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34 ==How reproducible: Always ==Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install both fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34.x86_64 and fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34.i686 ==Actual results: Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/share/doc/fontconfig/fontconfig-user.txt from install of fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34.i686 conflicts with file from package fontconfig-2.13.93-1.fc34.x86_64 ==Expected results: Install/Update to go smoothly, this is a very recent bug in rawhide from the last 2 days or so. ==Additional info: fontconfig x32 is needed for steam -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs November 2020