July 2020 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1677534] New: texttopaps OOMs with 4GB text file!

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677534 Bug ID: 1677534 Summary: texttopaps OOMs with 4GB text file! Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: paps Severity: high Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: desktop-qa-list(a)redhat.com, eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rhel(a)vlasiu.net, tagoh(a)redhat.com Depends On: 1635160 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora (Cloned from a RHEL7 report) +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1635160 +++ Description of problem: Trying to print with cups a 4Gb text file fail. texttopaps consume all the memory and is killed bye the system: [1023082.003989] Out of memory: Kill process xxxx (texttopaps) score 955 or sacrifice child [1023082.005120] Killed process xxxx (texttopaps) total-vm:19958848kB, anon-rss:7531872kB, file-rss:84kB, shmem-rss:0kB /usr/lib/cups/filter/texttopaps 1 user1 "example" 1 "" sample-4Gb.txt --- Additional comment from Akira TAGOH on 2018-10-03 11:54:48 SGT --- Hmm, that log says it all. I don't think OOM is a software bug. --- Additional comment from GV on 2018-10-03 13:00:48 SGT --- Of course OOM is not a software bug. Where exactly did I said that? The problem is texttopaps that allocate memory out of control. texttopaps should allocate memory, use-it, release-it. Like any sane program. The issue was not present on RHEL 6. I had printed the same file multiple times with cups on RHEL6 and it worked just fine (not sure it was texttopaps cups filter involved). Printing the file does not work on RHEL 7 and it should. The 4Gb file is a testcase for our application we develop. --- Additional comment from Jens Petersen on 2018-10-18 17:49:35 SGT --- I don't think the paps in RHEL7 is significantly different from RHEL6. As you say it could be due to changes in Cups? The cups versions in RHEL 6, 7 and Fedora are certainly quite different. Unless texttopaps really worked in RHEL6 it might make to reassign this to cups? --- Additional comment from GV on 2018-10-25 18:29:46 SGT --- Since the real computer running RHEL 6 was already scrapped, I tried to make a virtual machine using RHEL 6. Unfortunately, now I also get a crash on RHEL 6 when printing the 4GB file. I can't recall how much memory was in that computer. The virtual machine had 8Gb of memory allocated. Still, it does not matter that much. I think texttopaps have an issue and it should be fixed or at least an workaround should be available (other than 'don't print a file that large'). I'm afraid this is not a cups issue since I can reproduce the issue running the texttopaps standalone. Sincerely, Gabriel --- Additional comment from Akira TAGOH on 2018-11-16 17:59:04 SGT --- paps isn't supposed to work with large files. to support it, most of code needs to rewritten. this isn't realistic to provide an update for existing products. for a workaround, you can remove paps package (or simply remove /usr/share/cups/mime/paps.convs file) to fall back the text filter to texttops which CUPS originally provides. this should works for this issue and as long as you don't need the internationalization support for printing. Hope that helps. --- Additional comment from GV on 2018-12-07 14:03:33 SGT --- It helps. Thank you! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1635160 [Bug 1635160] texttopaps OOMs with 4GB text file! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

8 months, 3 weeks

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 1094015] Review Request: cwtex-q-fonts - a series of modern traditional Chinese fonts

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094015 Cheng-Chia Tseng <pswo10680(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|needinfo?(pswo10680(a)gmail.c | |om) | Last Closed| |2020-07-21 03:21:18 --- Comment #26 from Cheng-Chia Tseng <pswo10680(a)gmail.com> --- The fonts are not actively maintained, there is no new release since my 2015 package. And, I don't have time to maintain the package further. Plus, users can still install the fonts manually themselves. I decide to Close this bug report. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1858617] New: vlgothic-fonts-20200719 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858617 Bug ID: 1858617 Summary: vlgothic-fonts-20200719 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: vlgothic-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 20200719 Current version/release in rawhide: 20141206-16.fc32 URL: https://osdn.jp/projects/vlgothic/releases/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5103/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 1806272] DejaVu has been repackaged in F32+ using new fonts packaging macros; those macros use an srpm-independent file layout and remove srpm-level sharing like the previous -common subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806272 Bug 1806272 depends on bug 1835506, which changed state. Bug 1835506 Summary: DejaVu font issue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835506 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1853715] New: file conflicts between fbterm and ncurses (/usr/share/terminfo/f/fbterm)

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853715 Bug ID: 1853715 Summary: file conflicts between fbterm and ncurses (/usr/share/terminfo/f/fbterm) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: fbterm Severity: high Assignee: bazanluis20(a)gmail.com Reporter: grgoffe(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: bazanluis20(a)gmail.com, dingyichen(a)gmail.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: attempted system upgrade produces error messages (see below), /usr/share/terminfo/f/fbterm Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): see below How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1./usr/bin/dnf -y --noautoremove --refresh --skip-broken --best upgrade fbterm 2. 3. Actual results: see below Expected results: clean and successful system upgrade Additional info: Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/bin/gst-transcoder-1.0 from install of gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.17.1-1.fc33.x86_64 conflicts with file from package gst-transcoder-1.16.0-3.fc32.x86_64 file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgsttranscode.so from install of gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.17.1-1.fc33.x86_64 conflicts with file from package gst-transcoder-1.16.0-3.fc32.x86_64 file /usr/lib64/libgsttranscoder-1.0.so.0 from install of gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.17.1-1.fc33.x86_64 conflicts with file from package gst-transcoder-1.16.0-3.fc32.x86_64 file /usr/share/terminfo/f/fbterm from install of fbterm-1.7-19.fc33.x86_64 conflicts with file from package ncurses-term-6.2-2.20200222.fc33.noarch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 months, 1 week

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 835376] Request to add legend support feature for ibus-table

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835376 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|ibus-table-1.10.0-1.fc31 |ibus-table-1.10.0-1.fc31 | |ibus-table-1.10.0-1.fc32 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- FEDORA-2020-f9f120fb41 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 835376] Request to add legend support feature for ibus-table

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835376 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |ibus-table-1.10.0-1.fc31 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2020-07-11 01:03:51 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- FEDORA-2020-8f6a5c1295 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1094015] Review Request: cwtex-q-fonts - a series of modern traditional Chinese fonts

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094015 Package Review <package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(pswo10680(a)gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #25 from Package Review <package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> --- This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1647043] CVE-2018-18751 gettext: double free in default_add_message in read-catalog.c

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647043 errata-xmlrpc <errata-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link ID| |Red Hat Product Errata | |RHSA-2020:2846 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1647043] CVE-2018-18751 gettext: double free in default_add_message in read-catalog.c

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647043 --- Comment #13 from errata-xmlrpc <errata-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> --- This issue has been addressed in the following products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6 Extended Update Support Via RHSA-2020:2846 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:2846 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

9 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs July 2020