https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292637
Bug ID: 2292637
Summary: F41FailsToInstall: liberation-fonts-all
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Reporter: fti-bugs(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mark(a)net-c.com,
mclasen(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com
Blocks: 2260877 (F41FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Please note that this comment was generated automatically by
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py
If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at
https://pagure.io/releng/
Your package (liberation-fonts) Fails To Install in Fedora 41:
can't install liberation-fonts-all:
- nothing provides liberation-mono-fonts = 2.1.5-10.fc41 needed by
liberation-fonts-all-1:2.1.5-10.fc41.noarch
- nothing provides liberation-sans-fonts = 2.1.5-10.fc41 needed by
liberation-fonts-all-1:2.1.5-10.fc41.noarch
- nothing provides liberation-serif-fonts = 2.1.5-10.fc41 needed by
liberation-fonts-all-1:2.1.5-10.fc41.noarch
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please
acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to
maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent
packages realize the problem.
If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails…)
your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.
P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer
than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the
koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock:
$ mock -r fedora-41-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install
liberation-fonts-all
P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple
dependent packages, please consider using side tags:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-d…
Thanks!
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260877
[Bug 2260877] Fedora 41 Fails To install Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292637
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283284
Bug ID: 2283284
Summary: The directory /usr/share/paps/ is not in the RPM
database.
Product: Fedora
Version: 40
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: paps
Severity: medium
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: pampelmuse(a)gmx.at
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
The directory /usr/share/paps/ is not in the RPM database.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -qf /usr/share/paps
file /usr/share/paps is not owned by any package
Actual Results:
file /usr/share/paps is not owned by any package
Expected Results:
paps-0.8.0-8.fc40.x86_64
In spec file line 140 please add
%dir %{_datadir}/paps/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283284
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2291116
Bug ID: 2291116
Summary: `evdev.xml` is out of date
Product: Fedora
Version: 40
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: xkeyboard-config
Keywords: Desktop
Severity: high
Assignee: peter.hutterer(a)redhat.com
Reporter: most_simmers0j(a)icloud.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
negativo17(a)gmail.com, peter.hutterer(a)redhat.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
/usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/evdev.xml, the file responsible for displaying
available keyboard layouts names in settings doesn't have my layout (Rulemak)
and probably several other layouts supported by XKB. Plus, the whole Russian
section is a mess (there are 4 layouts with strange cryptic names, as if they
were auto-generated by some script--I couldn't find their names or source
looking up their keys, looks like they never existed. They all have "(m17n)"
and a strange icon of point and gear at the end of their buttons in Settings
window).
I tested it out--just adding rulemak entry to evdev.xml makes it works just
fine.
Other languages are probably also affected. I believe you can make evdev
contents be automatically generated from respective /symbols files.
Reproducible: Always
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2291116
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2284076
Bug ID: 2284076
Summary: Directory is missing in RPM database.
Product: Fedora
Version: 40
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Severity: medium
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: pampelmuse(a)gmx.at
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
The following directory is missing in RPM database:
/usr/lib/fontconfig/
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -qf /usr/lib/fontconfig/
file /usr/lib/fontconfig is not owned by any package
Actual Results:
not owned by any package
Expected Results:
fontconfig-2.15.0-4.fc40.x86_64
In spec file line 181 please add:
%dir /usr/lib/fontconfig/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2284076
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…