i18n-bugs August 2024

i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

2 participants
64 discussions

[Bug 2217542] New: cppcheck-2.11-1.fc39 fails on gettext.h with returnDanglingLifetime
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 20 Sep '24

20 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217542 Bug ID: 2217542 Summary: cppcheck-2.11-1.fc39 fails on gettext.h with returnDanglingLifetime Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: x86_64 URL: https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/actions/runs/5 378586167/jobs/9758588667#step:4:2099 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: gettext Severity: medium Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: jkonecny(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dueno(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nphilipp(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com, suanand(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora On Rawhide cppcheck was recently updated and now we are getting returnDanglingLifetime error from it on copied gettext.h file from /usr/share/gettext/gettext.h path. Version of cppcheck which shows this issue: 2.11-1.fc39 Last version of cppcheck which worked well: 2.9-4.fc38 I don't know if the error is valid or not... Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. podman run --rm -it fedora:rawhide 2. dnf install -y cppcheck gettext-devel 3. cppcheck -q -v /usr/share/gettext/gettext.h Actual Results: /usr/share/gettext/gettext.h:248:16: error: Returning pointer to local variable 'msg_ctxt_id' that will be invalid when returning. [returnDanglingLifetime] return translation; Expected Results: No error -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217542 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 10

[Bug 1999864] New: Cannot find package with font for Coptic although such a package exists for Fedora 34
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 19 Sep '24

19 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864 Bug ID: 1999864 Summary: Cannot find package with font for Coptic although such a package exists for Fedora 34 Product: Fedora Version: 34 Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: mfabian(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1819530 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1819530&action=edit Gnome Software unable to find Coptic fonts Using Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-34-1.2.iso in qemu. I played with emoji picker and Gnome popped up something requesting more fonts. I clicked and then Gnome Software said: “Unable to find the Coptic, Persian, Old (ca. 600-400 B.C.), Ugaritic you were searching for. Please see _the documentation_ for more information.” See attached screenshot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 2301573] New: m17n-db-1.8.7 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 Sep '24

16 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2301573 Bug ID: 2301573 Summary: m17n-db-1.8.7 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: m17n-db Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: mfabian(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mfabian(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 1.8.7 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.8.7 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.8.6-1.fc41 URL: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/m17n/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1869/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/m17n-db -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2301573 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 2

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1936817] New: [abrt] kasumi-unicode: emission_find(): kasumi-unicode killed by SIGSEGV
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 Sep '24

13 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936817 Bug ID: 1936817 Summary: [abrt] kasumi-unicode: emission_find(): kasumi-unicode killed by SIGSEGV Product: Fedora Version: 34 Hardware: x86_64 Status: NEW Whiteboard: abrt_hash:44f05d41fea2e8a472e511e723c030f064b80150;VAR IANT_ID=workstation; Component: kasumi Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: mfabian(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Version-Release number of selected component: kasumi-unicode-2.5-33.fc34 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.14.0 backtrace_rating: 4 cgroup: 0::/user.slice/user-1000.slice/user@1000.service/session.slice/org.gnome.Shell@wayland.service cmdline: kasumi-unicode crash_function: emission_find executable: /usr/bin/kasumi-unicode journald_cursor: s=4812fe31419f4a0d9519537873c0b262;i=1d75b;b=e33e48f83165443e996e9352116d67f6;m=a1416f520;t=5bd16d16bd6c8;x=215dd7f338688f54 kernel: 5.11.3-300.fc34.x86_64 rootdir: / runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (10 frames) #0 emission_find at ../gobject/gsignal.c:893 #4 gtk_widget_dispose at /usr/src/debug/gtk3-3.24.26-1.fc34.x86_64/gtk/gtkwidget.c:12162 #7 _gtk_header_bar_update_window_buttons at /usr/src/debug/gtk3-3.24.26-1.fc34.x86_64/gtk/gtkheaderbar.c:474 #8 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECTv at ../gobject/gmarshal.c:1910 #9 _g_closure_invoke_va at ../gobject/gclosure.c:873 #12 gtk_widget_propagate_hierarchy_changed_recurse at /usr/src/debug/gtk3-3.24.26-1.fc34.x86_64/gtk/gtkwidget.c:9995 #13 _gtk_widget_propagate_hierarchy_changed at /usr/src/debug/gtk3-3.24.26-1.fc34.x86_64/gtk/gtkwidget.c:10037 #14 gtk_widget_set_parent at /usr/src/debug/gtk3-3.24.26-1.fc34.x86_64/gtk/gtkwidget.c:9653 #15 gtk_window_set_titlebar at /usr/src/debug/gtk3-3.24.26-1.fc34.x86_64/gtk/gtkwindow.c:4234 #16 _gtk_builder_add at /usr/src/debug/gtk3-3.24.26-1.fc34.x86_64/gtk/gtkbuilder.c:906 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 17

[Bug 2290912] New: CVE-2024-29041 cldr-emoji-annotation: express: cause malformed URLs to be evaluated [fedora-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 11 Sep '24

11 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290912 Bug ID: 2290912 Summary: CVE-2024-29041 cldr-emoji-annotation: express: cause malformed URLs to be evaluated [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 40 Status: NEW Component: cldr-emoji-annotation Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Reporter: rkeshri(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290901 Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290912 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

[Bug 2251384] New: Wrong Arabic font prioritization in several apps. (Droid kufi prioritized over noto-sans)
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 05 Sep '24

05 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251384 Bug ID: 2251384 Summary: Wrong Arabic font prioritization in several apps. (Droid kufi prioritized over noto-sans) Product: Fedora Version: 39 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Severity: low Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: alawamiaz(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Few fedora releases ago, Noto-Sans-Arabic was set to be the default. It was working fine and Arabic text was displayed in all web browsers using this font. sometime in last few months, every web browser in fedora suddenly started prioritizing "Druid Kufi" font over noto-sans-arabic. which now looks makes arabic text looks jarring. Interestingly, when running from live usb image, noto-sans-arabic is correctly priotirized and being used to render all arabic web pages, but only for FEW MINUTES and then suddenly it's switched to druid kufi!, without updating anything, just running Firefox for few minutes. It's also reproducible after fresh install, the first 3 minutes of using the new fedora installation, Firefox and other browsers are displaying noto-sans then suddenly switch to druid kufi. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 38-39 How reproducible: Consistently Steps to Reproduce: 1.Connect to internet 2.Open arabic webpage in firefox (ex, wikipedia) 3.text would be displayed with druid kufi instead of the default noto-sans-arabic which was chosen to be the default sometime around fedora 36. Actual results: Arabic Text displayed with druid kufi font Expected results: Arabic text should be displayed using noto-sans-arabic as was the case before. Additional info: The font in gnome and top bars is still correctly displayed using noto-sans-arabic. It's browsers that exhibit the problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251384 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 12

[Bug 2293624] IBus Chewing for Traditional Chinese (Taiwan) Desktop by Default
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 26 Aug '24

26 Aug '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293624 --- Comment #6 from Aoife Moloney <amoloney(a)redhat.com> --- Thank you Kan-Ru! :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293624 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2293624] IBus Chewing for Traditional Chinese (Taiwan) Desktop by Default
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 22 Aug '24

22 Aug '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293624 Kan-Ru Chen <kanru(a)kanru.info> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(kanru(a)kanru.info) | Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Kan-Ru Chen <kanru(a)kanru.info> --- We are ready for the beta freeze! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293624 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2293624] IBus Chewing for Traditional Chinese (Taiwan) Desktop by Default
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 22 Aug '24

22 Aug '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293624 Aoife Moloney <amoloney(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(kanru(a)kanru.info) --- Comment #4 from Aoife Moloney <amoloney(a)redhat.com> --- Hi @kan-ru, I see your PR has been merged. Can this change be marked as ON_QA now, or is there another step to do before we can call this change complete in time for the beta freeze deadline of 27th August? Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293624 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2300903] New: libkkc: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f41
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 22 Aug '24

22 Aug '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2300903 Bug ID: 2300903 Summary: libkkc: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f41 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: libkkc Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dueno(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2260875 (F41FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora libkkc failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f41 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=120683485 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_41_Mass_Rebuild Please fix libkkc at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, libkkc will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 42, libkkc will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails… Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260875 [Bug 2260875] Fedora 41 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2300903 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 4

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs August 2024