i18n-bugs July 2026

i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
66 discussions

[Bug 2496419] Review Request: libreoffice-dictionaries - LibreOffice hunspell dictionaries
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 22 Jul '26

22 Jul '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2496419 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Review Service <fedora-review-bot(a)fedoraproject.org> --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10760684 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-re… Found issues: - License file LICENSE-dict is not marked as %license Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelin… Please know that there can be false-positives. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2496419 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2496419] Review Request: libreoffice-dictionaries - LibreOffice hunspell dictionaries
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 22 Jul '26

22 Jul '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2496419 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Review Service <fedora-review-bot(a)fedoraproject.org> --- Created attachment 2152230 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2152230&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 10695260 to 10760684 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2496419 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2496419] Review Request: libreoffice-dictionaries - LibreOffice hunspell dictionaries
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 22 Jul '26

22 Jul '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2496419 --- Comment #9 from Parag Nemade <pnemade(a)redhat.com> --- New upstream release Spec URL: https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/libreoffice-dictionaries.spec SRPM URL: https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/libreoffice-dictionaries-26.8.0.1-1.fc44.s… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2496419 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2435442] New: Question: Can fcitx5 branch and build to EPEL?
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Jul '26

17 Jul '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2435442 Bug ID: 2435442 Summary: Question: Can fcitx5 branch and build to EPEL? Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel10 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: fcitx Assignee: yanqiyu01(a)gmail.com Reporter: gerenlzn(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i(a)cicku.me, liangsuilong(a)gmail.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com, yanqiyu01(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Distro:Alma Linux 10.1 Because I am a KDE user and I have many XWayland software. iBus XWayland and non-GNOME experience is suck. So I wanna use fcitx5 on EPEL. Plz branch and build fcitx5 series package to EPEL :( Thx. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2435442 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 6

[Bug 2481403] New: m17n-db-1.8.12 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 14 Jul '26

14 Jul '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481403 Bug ID: 2481403 Summary: m17n-db-1.8.12 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: m17n-db Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: mfabian(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mfabian(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 1.8.12 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.8.12 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.8.11-1.fc45 URL: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/m17n/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1869/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/m17n-db -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481403 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 8

[Bug 2480521] New: fontconfig-2.18.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 Jul '26

13 Jul '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2480521 Bug ID: 2480521 Summary: fontconfig-2.18.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontconfig Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 2.18.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 2.18.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.17.0-4.fc44 URL: https://www.fontconfig.org/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/827/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fontconfig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2480521 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 10

[Bug 1326470] glibc `locale -a` output does not exactly match between locale-archive and langpacks.
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 10 Jul '26

10 Jul '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326470 Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link ID| |Github | |systemd/systemd/issues/4296 | |3 --- Comment #19 from Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com> --- I opened a ticket with systemd upstream: localectl list-locales does not show UTF-8-only locales <https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/42963> Hopefully this enables us to have a conversation with them and will tell us in which direction to fix glibc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326470 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2496419] Review Request: libreoffice-dictionaries - LibreOffice hunspell dictionaries
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 07 Jul '26

07 Jul '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2496419 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Review Service <fedora-review-bot(a)fedoraproject.org> --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10695260 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-re… Found issues: - License file COPYING.txt is not marked as %license Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelin… - Not a valid SPDX expression 'AGPL-3.0-only AND Apache-2.0 AND BSD-3-Clause AND (BSD-3-Clause OR CC-BY-3.0) AND BSD-3-Clause-Modification AND CC-BY-4.0 AND (CC-BY-4.0 or LGPL-3.0-only) AND CC-BY-SA-3.0 AND CC0-1.0 AND GFDL-1.2-invariants-or-later AND GPL-1.0-only AND (GPL-1.0-only OR LGPL-2.1-only) AND GPL-1.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-only AND (GPL-2.0-only AND LGPL-2.1-only) AND (GPL-2.0-only OR GPL-3.0-only) AND (GPL-2.0-only OR LGPL-2.1-only OR MPL-1.1) AND GPL-2.0-or-later AND (GPL-2.0-or-later OR LGPL-2.1-or-later OR MPL-1.1) AND (GPL-2.0-or-later OR LGPL-2.1-or-later OR MPL-1.1 OR Apache-2.0 OR CC-BY-SA-4.0 AND GPL-3.0-only AND (GPL-3.0-only OR LGPL-2.1-only OR MPL-1.1) AND GPL-3.0-or-later AND (GPL-3.0-or-later OR LGPL-3.0-or-later OR MPL-1.1) AND (GPL-3.0-or-later OR LGPL-3.0-or-later OR MPL-2.0) AND LGPL-2.1-only AND LGPL-2.1-or-later AND LGPL-3.0-only AND LGPL-3.0-only AND MPL-1.1 AND LPPL-1.3c AND MPL-1.1 AND MPL-2.0 AND NTP'. Read more: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1 Please know that there can be false-positives. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2496419 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2496419] Review Request: libreoffice-dictionaries - LibreOffice hunspell dictionaries
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 07 Jul '26

07 Jul '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2496419 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Review Service <fedora-review-bot(a)fedoraproject.org> --- Created attachment 2148002 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2148002&action=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 10677368 to 10695260 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2496419 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2496419] Review Request: libreoffice-dictionaries - LibreOffice hunspell dictionaries
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 06 Jul '26

06 Jul '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2496419 --- Comment #6 from Parag Nemade <pnemade(a)redhat.com> --- Updated SPEC with some enhancements - Consolidate all es-* subpackages into -es subpackage - Add source rpm license tag as combined license of binary rpm packages Spec URL: https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/libreoffice-dictionaries.spec SRPM URL: https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/libreoffice-dictionaries-26.2.5.1-3.fc44.s… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2496419 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs July 2026