https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753295
--- Comment #21 from Patryk Obara <dreamer.tan+fedora(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #15)
what is the actual purpose of this bug report, since this was an
intentional
upstream change whose effect was known and accepted? what does the reporter
expect to happen before the report is CLOSED?
The reporter didn't bother to actually answer the question, but I'll try:
- identifying fix/workaround for spacing issue (comments in
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pango/issues/386 indicate, that this might Pango
issue, but I am not sure - correct me if I'm wrong, please) and re-assigning it
to the appropriate package
- identifying all fonts affected, perhaps prioritizing them (I guess
repackaging Terminus only would solve >50% complaints about this change)
- mass-update to affected packages (?)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.