Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510
Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |needinfo?(fangqq(a)gmail.com)
--- Comment #8 from Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> 2009-03-27 10:29:06 EDT
---
Do statements like "quality is not impressive" have agreement from our
Japanese
developers? This might very well be true, but we need to avoid the appearance
of cultural favoritism.
First, pango can not tell if "日本語" are Japanese Kanji or
Chinese Hanzi, while
PANGU_LANGUAGE is not defined under non-CJK language, so, pango will not mark
the character with the proper language tags, and some CJK specific fontconfig
rules will be bypassed.
What is the purpose of CJK specific fontconfig rules, and why is it necessary
for CJK to behave differently than non-CJK when dealing with CJK-glyphs?
Do C, J and K fontconfig rules differ from each other?
2. update 65-non-latin.conf. it is too old and only makes more
troubles if it
stay the way it is.
What do you suggest for this?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.