Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: JTextArea & JTextField do not send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS events to XIM server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462412
Summary: JTextArea & JTextField do not send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS events to XIM server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk AssignedTo: langel@redhat.com ReportedBy: shawn.p.huang@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: mark@klomp.org, langel@redhat.com, lkundrak@v3.sk, fedora-i18n-bugs@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Description of problem: JTextArea & JTextField do not send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS to XIM server. When JTextArea & JTextField work with XIM input methods, it do not set or unset ic focus via XIM protocol. So XIM server can not handle focus for Java application properly. I did not try other java widgets, maybe they have this problem too.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-0.20.b11.fc10.i386 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.20.b11.fc10.i386 java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-0.20.b11.fc10.i386
How reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Actual results: JTextArea & JTextField do not send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS events to XIM server.
Expected results: JTextArea & JTextField send XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS & XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS events to XIM server, when they get or lose focus.
Additional info:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462412
John john5342@googlemail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462412
Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tagoh@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2008-11-25 22:06:08 EDT ---
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'.
More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462412
--- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2009-11-18 02:46:24 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life.
Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462412
Peng Huang phuang@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |12
--- Comment #3 from Peng Huang phuang@redhat.com 2009-11-24 00:41:30 EDT --- It still happens in f12.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462412
Omair Majid omajid@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |omajid@redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(phuang@redhat.com | |)
--- Comment #6 from Omair Majid omajid@redhat.com 2010-09-16 10:08:17 EDT --- Any ideas how I can confirm this problem or test if a fix works? I ask because I see several calls to XSetICFocus in the openjdk sources (specifically jdk/src/solaris/native/sun/awt/awt_InputMethod.c).
Thanks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462412
Omair Majid omajid@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rruss@redhat.com |omajid@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462412
--- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2010-11-04 07:47:28 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 12. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '12'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life.
Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462412
--- Comment #8 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2010-11-19 07:09:20 EST --- Created attachment 461530 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=461530 testcase
I'm not quite sure how to see if the certain event is sent to XIM server. so bridging the XIM protocol by imsettings-xim and enabling the monitoring feature on it here. it looks working enough for this purpose. so I just went ahead with it for this testing.
Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install ibus ibus-anthy imsettings 2. LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 imsettings-start IBus 3. LIBGXIM_DEBUG=all imsettings-xim 2>&1 | tee /tmp/xim.log 4. javac bz462412.java 5. XMODIFIERS=@im=imsettings java Bz462412 6. move the window focus to others 7. move back the focus
Actual results: no XIM events sent at 6 and 7
Expected results: 2. the keyboard icon should appears at the notification area. 6. XIM_UNSET_IC_FOCUS should be sent 7. XIM_SET_IC_FOCUS should be sent
Additional info: You could check what the expected behaviour is with gedit like this: % XMODIFIERS=@im=imsettings GTK_IM_MODULE=xim gedit
and try step 6 and 7.
HTH,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462412
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|12 |14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462412
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(phuang@redhat.com | |) |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462412
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|14 |rawhide
--- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2011-11-15 02:36:22 EST --- This still persists on f16. updated steps against comment#8:
1. yum install ibus ibus-anthy imsettings imsettings-xim 3. LIBGXIM_DEBUG=all imsettings-xim --address=unix:abstract=/tmp/imsettings-xim --replace 2>&1 | tee /tmp/xim.log
Tested with: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-60.1.10.4.fc16.x86_64 java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-60.1.10.4.fc16.x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462412
--- Comment #11 from Fedora End Of Life endoflife@fedoraproject.org --- This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '19'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 19 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462412
Fedora End Of Life endoflife@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed| |2015-02-18 06:57:41
--- Comment #12 from Fedora End Of Life endoflife@fedoraproject.org --- Fedora 19 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-01-06. Fedora 19 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org