https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2395836
Bug ID: 2395836 Summary: don't combine pinyin Chinese IME and bopomofo Chinese IME into one single package Product: Fedora Version: 42 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: ibus-libpinyin Keywords: Desktop, RFE Severity: medium Assignee: pwu@redhat.com Reporter: lutingrong@hotmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen@redhat.com, pwu@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Hello the authors of ibus-libpinyin ,
I'm using ibus-libpinyin on fedora 42 . I found ibus-libpinyin provides both pinyin Chinese IME and bopomofo Chinese IME . Could you please consider split ibus-libpinyin into ibus-libpinyin and ibus-libbopomofo ? The reason is that those who use pinyin IME doesn't know bopomofo IME at all , and vice verse those who use bopomofo IME doesn't know pinyin IME neither . So I can install only the package which I use . Why must combine pinyin IME and bopomofo IME into one single package ? Most hope there is no unnecessary codes in their computers . Hope ibus-libpinyin more modularized and more divided ! Thanks for your time and consideration!
Best regards, Tingrong
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce: 1. sudo dnf install ibus-libpinyin 2. ibus-setup 3. will see there are both pinyin Chinese IME and bopomofo Chinese IME Actual Results: one single package -- ibus-libpinyin provides more than one IME .
Expected Results: one package provides only one IME .
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2395836
--- Comment #1 from lutingrong@hotmail.com --- Created attachment 2106794 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2106794&action=edit screenshot of ibus-setup
screenshot of ibus-setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2395836
Peng Wu pwu@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link ID| |Github | |libpinyin/ibus-libpinyin/is | |sues/530
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2395836
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- I guess most libpinyin users don't need "libbopomofo" so maybe it makes sense to split the xml file and subpackage bopomofo?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2395836
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Release Engineering releng@fedoraproject.org --- This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 42 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 42 on 2026-05-13. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a 'version' of '42'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' to a later Fedora Linux version. Note that the version field may be hidden. Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see it.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora Linux 42 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version prior to this bug being closed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2395836
Aoife Moloney amoloney@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed| |2026-06-09 11:16:27
--- Comment #4 from Aoife Moloney amoloney@redhat.com --- Fedora Linux 42 entered end-of-life (EOL) status on 2026-05-27.
Fedora Linux 42 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora Linux please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Note that the version field may be hidden. Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see the version field.
If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against an active release.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2395836
Peng Wu alexepico@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexepico@gmail.com Version|42 |43 Resolution|EOL |--- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org