Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902861
Bug ID: 902861 Summary: pango-font pedantic warnings Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: pango Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: mike@cchtml.com
Created attachment 685210 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=685210&action=edit pango-font-pedantic.patch
Starting in Pango 1.32, the pango-font.h header tries to store 64-bit values in a 32-bit enumerator. I have changed the enumerator to be #define's instead.
Patch attached.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-1.32.3-1.fc18
Actual results: /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pango-font.h:380:33: warning: ISO C restricts enumerator values to range of ‘int’ [-pedantic]
Expected results: No compile warnings.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902861
--- Comment #1 from Michael Cronenworth mike@cchtml.com --- Well... not 64-bit values (duh) but unsigned int in a int.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902861
Michael Cronenworth mike@cchtml.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |GNOME Desktop 692808
--- Comment #2 from Michael Cronenworth mike@cchtml.com --- I filed the bug and patch upstream.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692808
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902861
--- Comment #3 from Michael Cronenworth mike@cchtml.com --- It has been fixed in the latest pango release.
Could an update for Pango 1.32.6 for Fedora 18 be spun?
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902861
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|mclasen@redhat.com |tagoh@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902861
Simone Caronni negativo17@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|unspecified |high CC| |negativo17@gmail.com Severity|unspecified |high
--- Comment #5 from Simone Caronni negativo17@gmail.com --- Hello,
I'm trying to create a new package for Fedora 18 but I stepped into the same problem. I can update el6, f17 and f19+ but f18 will be lagging behind.
Bug is open since January, can someone push an update for Fedora 18?
koji build failing and log:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5500034 http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/34/5500034/build.log
Thanks, --Simone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902861
--- Comment #6 from Michael Cronenworth mike@cchtml.com --- Simone, unfortunately Pango had some development releases in the 1.32 stable version branch. 1.32.6 is one of those releases.
My patch could be applied to the F18 package (1.32.3) without needing to worry about other packages in F18.
Worst case (as Red Hat maintainers sometimes ignore these bug reports): You will have to add a patch to your package to remove -Werror.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902861
--- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com --- (In reply to Michael Cronenworth from comment #3)
It has been fixed in the latest pango release.
Could an update for Pango 1.32.6 for Fedora 18 be spun?
maybe not because it requires newer fontconfig which may not be sufficient for updates since it has a lot of changes. or we could do that once it works fine on f19.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902861
--- Comment #8 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com --- (In reply to Michael Cronenworth from comment #6)
Simone, unfortunately Pango had some development releases in the 1.32 stable version branch. 1.32.6 is one of those releases.
My patch could be applied to the F18 package (1.32.3) without needing to worry about other packages in F18.
Worst case (as Red Hat maintainers sometimes ignore these bug reports): You will have to add a patch to your package to remove -Werror.
I'm planning to patch 1.32.3 out with it so far.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902861
--- Comment #9 from Simone Caronni negativo17@gmail.com --- (In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #8)
I'm planning to patch 1.32.3 out with it so far.
Yes please, that would be great!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902861
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902861
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- pango-1.32.3-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pango-1.32.3-2.fc18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902861
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- Package pango-1.32.3-2.fc18: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing pango-1.32.3-2.fc18' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-11104/pango-1.32.3-2.fc1... then log in and leave karma (feedback).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902861
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |pango-1.32.3-2.fc18 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2013-06-19 00:28:54
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- pango-1.32.3-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org