[Bug 2267629] New: liberation-mono-fonts breaks default font for Hebrew

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267629

Bug ID: 2267629
           Summary: liberation-mono-fonts breaks default font for Hebrew
           Product: Fedora
           Version: 40
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
         Component: google-noto-fonts
          Keywords: i18n
          Severity: medium
          Assignee: [e-mail]
          Reporter: [e-mail]
        QA Contact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail],
                    [e-mail],
                    [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]
  Target Milestone: ---
    Classification: Fedora

google-noto-sans-hebrew-vf-fonts is supposed to be a default monospace font for
Hebrew though, liberation-mono-fonts is picked up as the default monospace font
when it is installed.

This happens because liberation use 59 as the priority number although
google-noto-sans-hebrew-vf-fonts use 66.

The priority number needs to be updated.

Reproducible: Always

[Bug 2267629] liberation-mono-fonts breaks default font for Hebrew

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267629

Red Hat One Jira (issues.redhat.com)  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Link ID|                            |Red Hat Issue Tracker
                   |                            |FC-1131

[Bug 2267629] liberation-mono-fonts breaks default font for Hebrew

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267629

--- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH  ---
We have two options to address this:

1) Add the generic alias rule for monospace in
google-noto-sans-hebrew-vf-fonts. Though Noto Sans Hebrew is a sans-serif font.

2) Accept liberation-mono-fonts as a default monospace font for Hebrew

[Bug 2267629] liberation-mono-fonts breaks default font for Hebrew

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267629

Akira TAGOH  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|40                          |42

--- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH  ---
need some feedback about the above question. postponing to the future release
so far. moving to 42.