Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: fonts.alias refer to encodings not listed in fonts.dir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733106
Summary: fonts.alias refer to encodings not listed in fonts.dir Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: sazanami-fonts AssignedTo: tagoh@redhat.com ReportedBy: viy@altlinux.org QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh@redhat.com, fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: ---
fonts.alias files refer to jisx020*.19??-0 font encodings while fonts.dir does not list them. looks like a fonts.scale/fonts.dir generation bug. /usr/share/X11/fonts/encodings/large/* encodings should be present during fonts.scale/fonts.dir generation.
sazanami-fonts-0.20040629-15.fc15.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733106
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733106
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |sazanami-fonts-0.20040629-1 | |6.fc17 Resolution| |RAWHIDE Last Closed| |2011-08-25 03:38:55
--- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2011-08-25 03:38:55 EDT --- Fixed in sazanami-fonts-0.20040629-16.fc17.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733106
Igor Vlasenko viy@altlinux.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | Keywords| |Reopened
--- Comment #2 from Igor Vlasenko viy@altlinux.org 2011-08-26 11:46:18 EDT ---
Fixed in sazanami-fonts-0.20040629-16.fc17.
Not yet. fonts.alias mentions jisx0208.1983-0 and jisx0201.1976-0 encodings, while fonts.dir use jisx0208.1983-0 and jisx0201.1990-0 encodings. Replace s,jisx0201.1976-0,jisx0201.1990-0,g in fonts.alias to fix the bug completely.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733106
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psatpute@redhat.com Component|sazanami-fonts |ttmkfdir AssignedTo|tagoh@redhat.com |psatpute@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2011-08-29 03:38:38 EDT --- Well, that is generated by ttmkfdir. reassigning to ttmkfdir then.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733106
--- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com 2011-08-31 06:32:51 EDT --- just checked sazanami-gothic.ttf
is it really supports JIS_X_0201?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JIS_X_0201 "7-bit and 8-bit coded character sets for information interchange"
Just checked it by editing in fontforge, it shows me different characters than JIS_X_0201 at location 0xA1, 0xA2. (chart is available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JIS_X_0201)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733106
--- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2011-08-31 07:29:01 EDT --- the character code like 0xA1 and 0xA2 isn't something mapped onto Unicode, but on JIS X 0201. and this is a character sets but not an encoding, those code doesn't necessarily matches to other encoding such as SJIS and EUC-JP.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733106
--- Comment #7 from Fedora End Of Life endoflife@fedoraproject.org --- This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '19'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 19 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733106
Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|19 |20
--- Comment #8 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com --- moving to F20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733106
--- Comment #9 from Fedora End Of Life endoflife@fedoraproject.org --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 20. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '20'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 20 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733106
Fedora End Of Life endoflife@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed|2011-08-25 03:38:55 |2015-06-29 20:34:13
--- Comment #10 from Fedora End Of Life endoflife@fedoraproject.org --- Fedora 20 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-06-23. Fedora 20 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733106
Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|20 |23 Resolution|EOL |---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733106
--- Comment #11 from Fedora End Of Life jkurik@fedoraproject.org --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '23'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733106
Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|23 |25
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733106
--- Comment #12 from Fedora End Of Life jkurik@fedoraproject.org --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 25 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '25'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 25 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733106
Fedora End Of Life jkurik@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed|2015-06-29 20:34:13 |2017-12-12 05:29:37
--- Comment #13 from Fedora End Of Life jkurik@fedoraproject.org --- Fedora 25 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-12-12. Fedora 25 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org