[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 577575] New: [abrt] crash in scim-1.4.9-4.fc12: Process /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: [abrt] crash in scim-1.4.9-4.fc12: Process /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577575

Summary: [abrt] crash in scim-1.4.9-4.fc12: Process
                    /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk was killed by
                    signal 6 (SIGABRT)
           Product: Fedora
           Version: 12
          Platform: x86_64
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
 Status Whiteboard: abrt_hash:317599895cb4f8238af79a785c10a695ffb090c8
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: scim
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]
         QAContact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail], [e-mail],
                    [e-mail], [e-mail]
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora

abrt 1.0.8 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk --display :0.0 -c socket -d
--no-stay
component: scim
executable: /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk
kernel: 2.6.31.12-174.2.22.fc12.x86_64
package: scim-1.4.9-4.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk was killed by signal 6
(SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 577575] [abrt] crash in scim-1.4.9-4.fc12: Process /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577575

--- Comment #1 from Claude G Wilbur  2010-03-27 23:10:41 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=403075)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=403075)
File: backtrace

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 577575] [abrt] crash in scim-1.4.9-4.fc12: Process /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577575

--- Comment #2 from Claude G Wilbur  2010-04-17 02:38:03 EDT ---

How to reproduce
-----
1.enable smart pinyin scim
2.wait
3.

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 577575] [abrt] crash in scim-1.4.9-4.fc12: Process /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577575

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]           |[e-mail]

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 577575] [abrt] crash in scim-1.4.9-4.fc12: Process /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577575

--- Comment #3 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client  2010-06-25 01:40:25 EDT ---
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning
to the new owner of this component.

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 577575] [abrt] crash in scim-1.4.9-4.fc12: Process /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577575

Parag  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #4 from Parag  2010-09-01 01:31:17 EDT ---
Please provide detail steps how to reproduce this crash

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 577575] [abrt] crash in scim-1.4.9-4.fc12: Process /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577575

Parag  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Triaged

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 577575] [abrt] crash in scim-1.4.9-4.fc12: Process /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577575

Parag  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(dcwilbur@earthlin
                   |                            |k.net)

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 577575] [abrt] crash in scim-1.4.9-4.fc12: Process /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577575

Parag  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |INSUFFICIENT_DATA
               Flag|needinfo?(dcwilbur@earthlin |
                   |k.net)                      |
        Last Closed|                            |2010-09-30 02:27:23

--- Comment #5 from Parag  2010-09-30 02:27:23 EDT ---
I suppose we had enough waiting here.