[Bug 2496419] Review Request: libreoffice-dictionaries - LibreOffice hunspell dictionaries

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2496419

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|[e-mail]    |[e-mail]

--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen  ---
libreoffice-dict-an.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Aragonese', 'Summary(en_US)
Aragonese -> Aragon')
libreoffice-dict-an.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Aragonese', '%description -l
en_US Aragonese -> Aragon')

libreoffice-dict-bo.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Tibetian', 'Summary(en_US)
Tibetian -> Tibetan, Titian')
libreoffice-dict-bo.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Tibetian', '%description -l
en_US Tibetian -> Tibetan, Titian')

This ^^ is a typo

libreoffice-dict-es-CR.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Costa', 'Summary(en_US)
Costa -> Hosta, Coats, Costs')
libreoffice-dict-es-CR.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Costa', '%description -l
en_US Costa -> Hosta, Coats, Costs')

This ^ should be Costa Rica?

Though I am not convinced we should split all the Spanish dictionaries: it
seems upstream doesn't?

libreoffice-dict-gl.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Galician', 'Summary(en_US)
Galician -> Clinician, Galvanic, Alicia')
libreoffice-dict-gl.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Galician', '%description -l
en_US Galician -> Clinician, Galvanic, Alicia')
libreoffice-dict-oc.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Occitan', 'Summary(en_US)
Occitan -> Occidental')
libreoffice-dict-oc.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Occitan', '%description -l
en_US Occitan -> Occidental')
libreoffice-dict-or.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Odia', 'Summary(en_US) Odia ->
Odis, Odin, Zodiac')
libreoffice-dict-or.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Odia', '%description -l en_US
Odia -> Odis, Odin, Zodiac')
libreoffice-dict-si.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Sinhala', 'Summary(en_US)
Sinhala -> Sinhalese')
libreoffice-dict-si.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Sinhala', '%description -l
en_US Sinhala -> Sinhalese')
libreoffice-dictionaries.src: E: spelling-error ('hunspell', 'Summary(en_US)
hunspell -> Hunspell, unshapely')
libreoffice-dictionaries.src: E: spelling-error ('hunspell', '%description -l
en_US hunspell -> Hunspell, unshapely')
libreoffice-dictionaries.spec: W: no-%check-section
libreoffice-dictionaries.spec: W: no-%check-section
libreoffice-dictionaries.spec: W: no-%check-section
libreoffice-dict-bg.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/libreoffice-dict-bg/COPYING
libreoffice-dict-bn_BD.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/libreoffice-dict-bn_BD/COPYING
libreoffice-dict-eo.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/hunspell/eo.aff
libreoffice-dict-gd.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/hunspell/gd_GB.aff
libreoffice-dict-hi.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/libreoffice-dict-hi/COPYING
libreoffice-dict-hi.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/libreoffice-dict-hi/Copyright
libreoffice-dict-kn.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/libreoffice-dict-kn/README-kn_IN.txt
libreoffice-dict-lv.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/libreoffice-dict-lv/README_lv_LV.txt
libreoffice-dict-mr.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/libreoffice-dict-mr/COPYING
libreoffice-dict-oc.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/libreoffice-dict-oc/LICENCES-fr.txt
libreoffice-dict-pl.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/libreoffice-dict-pl/README_pl.txt
libreoffice-dict-ro.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/libreoffice-dict-ro/COPYING.GPL
libreoffice-dict-ro.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/libreoffice-dict-ro/COPYING.LGPL
libreoffice-dict-sk.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/libreoffice-dict-sk/LICENSE.txt
libreoffice-dict-te.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/libreoffice-dict-te/README_te_IN.txt
 94 packages and 2 specfiles checked; 31 errors, 3 warnings, 351 filtered, 31
badness; has taken 15.4 s
> Spec license: GPL-2.0-or-later OR LGPL-2.1-or-later OR MPL-1.1

Not sure if this is sufficient, though there is no binary base package.