[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: un-extra-fonts
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]
         QAContact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail], [e-mail]
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora

This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:

repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*.fc[123456789](.*)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq

Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.

Otherwise, you should know that:

- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_i...

- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(20...)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts

Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.

If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.

It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family

The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.

The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts

If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

Nicolas Mailhot  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redh
                   |                            |at.com
             Blocks|                            |477044

--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot   2008-12-20 19:57:34 EDT ---
[Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented
form.]

This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:

repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa'
--qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*.fc[123456789](.*)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq

Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if
that's your case, you can close this bug report now.

Otherwise, you should know that:

— Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or
subpackage):
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_i...

— our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package:
  –
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(20...)
  – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
  – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
  – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts

Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can
use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to
rawhide please).

If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font
package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not
use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the
font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories.

It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though
it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora
11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family

The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.

The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can
serve as examples:
❄ andika-fonts
❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts
❄ bitstream-vera-fonts
❄ charis-fonts
❄ dejavu-fonts
❄ ecolier-court-fonts
❄ edrip-fonts
❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts
❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts
❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts
❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts
❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts
❄ gfs-complutum-fonts
❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts
❄ gfs-didot-fonts
❄ gfs-eustace-fonts
❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts
❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts
❄ gfs-gazis-fonts
❄ gfs-jackson-fonts
❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts
❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts
❄ gfs-olga-fonts
❄ gfs-porson-fonts
❄ gfs-solomos-fonts
❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts
❄ stix-fonts
❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts

If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them
on:
fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot   2009-01-11 10:20:34 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published
the following FAQ

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ)

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot   2009-01-14 13:38:16 EDT ---
FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into
account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage:

– 2009-01-14: naming
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01...

— 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%...

(packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package
are not impacted)

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[un-extra-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot   2009-02-18 14:33:02 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|11                          |rawhide
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]           |[e-mail]

--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen   2009-12-09 02:22:18 EDT ---
Taking this since I sponsored smallvil.

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

Jens Petersen  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]         |[e-mail]

--- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen  2010-04-22 21:06:04 EDT ---
Ueno-san, do you mind taking this one?

I think you can base the packaging on un-core-fonts
which I updated a while back - though it might need
some further tweaks too to be completely uptodate too.

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

--- Comment #9 from Daiki Ueno  2010-04-23 06:03:56 EDT ---
Not at all :) I'll attach a diff to the new spec which hopefully complies with
the new font policy.

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

--- Comment #10 from Daiki Ueno  2010-04-23 06:04:49 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=408561)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=408561)
patch to adjust the package to the new font policy

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client  2010-04-24 01:46:40 EDT ---
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning
to the new owner of this component.

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

Daiki Ueno  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #408561|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #12 from Daiki Ueno  2010-04-26 01:15:12 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=409063)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=409063)
patch to adjust the package to the new font policy (v2)

minimize the change from the original spec

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  2010-04-27 04:48:30 EDT ---
un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.10.080608.fc13 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 13.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.10.080608.fc13

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  2010-04-27 04:49:30 EDT ---
un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.10.080608.fc12 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 12.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.10.080608.fc12

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  2010-04-27 04:51:10 EDT ---
un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.10.080608.fc11 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.10.080608.fc11

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

Daiki Ueno  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |MODIFIED

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |ON_QA

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  2010-04-27 21:11:24 EDT ---
un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.10.080608.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update un-extra-fonts'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.10.080608.fc11

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  2010-04-27 21:19:38 EDT ---
un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.10.080608.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update un-extra-fonts'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.10.080608.fc12

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  2010-04-27 21:20:02 EDT ---
un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.10.080608.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update un-extra-fonts'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.10.080608.fc13

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  2010-05-21 21:50:57 EDT ---
un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.10.080608.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|                            |un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.10.0
                   |                            |80608.fc11
         Resolution|                            |ERRATA