Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: imsettings and ibus-gtk installed when @input-methods deselected
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514157
Summary: imsettings and ibus-gtk installed when @input-methods deselected Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: anaconda AssignedTo: anaconda-maint-list@redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: pjones@redhat.com, tagoh@redhat.com, petersen@redhat.com, anaconda-maint-list@redhat.com, kanarip@kanarip.com, fedora-i18n-bugs@redhat.com, rmaximo@cfl.rr.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 513782
I can test on rawhide later but it seems ibus and imsettings get installed with F11 when one customizes and unchecks @input-methods.
This is somewhat strange: wondered if some multilib related code is pulling in ibus-gtk or something like that?
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #513782 +++
"I just noticed this problem today : imsettings package is not in the Input Method group, resulting in it being installed even when input methods group is unselected during install in anaconda... thus, imsettings-start is launched when opening a new gnome session, but is useless."
--- Additional comment from petersen@redhat.com on 2009-07-27 03:33:01 EDT ---
I did a test install of F11 with @input-methods unchecked and ibus, ibus-gtk and hence im-chooser and imsettings got installed.
--- Additional comment from petersen@redhat.com on 2009-07-27 03:36:48 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=355237) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=355237) install.log
default English F11 i386 install log just with Input Methods unchecked
--- Additional comment from petersen@redhat.com on 2009-07-27 03:53:36 EDT ---
... and nothing seems to require them.
--- Additional comment from petersen@redhat.com on 2009-07-27 04:58:27 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=355249) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=355249) anaconda-ks.cfg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514157
Chris Lumens clumens@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(petersen@redhat.c | |om)
--- Comment #1 from Chris Lumens clumens@redhat.com 2009-07-28 11:18:06 EDT --- Once rawhide's working again, can you please try a rawhide install and attach /tmp/yum.log to this bug report? We should now have much better debugging capabilities for these sorts of issues (like seeing what packages are getting pulled in as requirements of others).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514157
--- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2009-07-28 22:44:12 EDT --- Since @input-methods are turned on by default, those packages were added to the package list once. I guess anaconda may re-evaluate the package list every time when modifying groups on the package custom selection. those is/was NOT in comps - imsettings and im-chooser has been added - so when @input-methods is turned off, it may be just kept there because anaconda doesn't have any kind of information what packages was added by turning on the group but relying on the group information in comps what kind of packages is included in?
Is it likely scenario?
Given that it's the case, adding all of packages to comps to get yum-groupremove working sounds not realistic to me. I hope it will be improved.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514157
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Version|11 |rawhide Blocks| |473302(F12Target) Flag|needinfo?(petersen@redhat.c | |om) |
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-10-23 04:08:39 EDT --- Hmm I just reproduced with F12-Beta x86_64...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514157
Chris Lumens clumens@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |corentin.perard@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Chris Lumens clumens@redhat.com 2009-12-22 15:30:11 EDT --- *** Bug 544884 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514157
--- Comment #5 from Corentin Perard corentin.perard@gmail.com 2009-12-23 08:05:23 EDT --- Hi all ! You can find extra info on the above-cited bug report. I was not aware that another bug was filed... sorry
I confirm no success with F12 Gold x86_64 DVD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514157
Andy Lindeberg irishmangoes@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW CC| |irishmangoes@gmail.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514157
Chris Lumens clumens@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(petersen@redhat.c | |om)
--- Comment #7 from Chris Lumens clumens@redhat.com 2010-04-12 16:50:18 EDT --- Can anyone attach the information requested in comment #1?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514157
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(petersen@redhat.c | |om) |
--- Comment #8 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2010-04-14 04:07:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=406427) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=406427) anaconda.yum.log
You mean anaconda.yum.log?
I got this with installing f13 beta without @input-methods on English locale.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514157
Chris Lumens clumens@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org