Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: fontconfig-2.8.0-1 changes default Monospace font from DejaVu Sans Mono to Baekmuk Gulim
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563409
Summary: fontconfig-2.8.0-1 changes default Monospace font from DejaVu Sans Mono to Baekmuk Gulim Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: un-core-fonts AssignedTo: smallvil@get9.net ReportedBy: tagoh@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh@redhat.com, petersen@redhat.com, jks@iname.com, besfahbo@redhat.com, mattias.ellert@fysast.uu.se, edgar.hoch@ims.uni-stuttgart.de, pnemade@redhat.com, smallvil@get9.net, fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute@redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs@redhat.com Depends on: 546490 Blocks: 507684 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 546490
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #546490 +++
Description of problem: I did a yum update and discovered emacs was using the Baekmuk Gulim font. Code editing needs to be done in a fixed-width font! Baekmuk Gulim is not fixed-width. Directory listings look horrible because the fields are not aligned. I changed my emacs settings back and everything is fine for me now, but I bet a bunch of people will have no idea what font to change back to. I was only able to figure it out because I had an emacs running from before the yum update.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.8.0-1.fc11.x86_64
--- Additional comment from tagoh@redhat.com on 2009-12-14 03:52:56 EST ---
This issue is easily reproducible with fc-match "monospace:lang=en" though, there are two things introduced in 2.8.0:
1. the above command matches lang="ko" too 2. Baekmuk Gulim has been added to the pattern with the strong binding somehow. which has ever been added with the weak binding.
--- Additional comment from tagoh@redhat.com on 2010-02-02 06:26:00 EST ---
This might be the configuration file issue in 65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf. as I pointed out current behaviour in the list [*1] and due to the issue we have in Bug#518161 too perhaps dunno, comparing the lang with 'ko' behaves wrongly in current implementation of fontconfig at least. modifying like the following works expectedly:
<test name="lang"> <string>ko-kr</string> </test>
FYI
*1 - http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/2009-November/003275.html
--- Additional comment from petersen@redhat.com on 2010-02-02 11:42:55 EST ---
Behdad said he would look into the lang= issues but maybe we should reassign to baekmuk-ttf at least as a workaround for f13?
--- Additional comment from tagoh@redhat.com on 2010-02-02 23:01:07 EST ---
maybe. we could clone this to keep both on track.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563409
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2010-02-11 02:24:22 EST --- I just reproduced the old baekmuk-ttf issue with emacs and removed it, but I have un-core-dotum-fonts and didn't see a problem with it?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563409
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|smallvil@get9.net |petersen@redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh@redhat.com)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563409
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tagoh@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2010-02-24 01:37:16 EST --- you mean un-core-gulim-fonts?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563409
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563409
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cchance@redhat.com Component|un-core-fonts |baekmuk-ttf-fonts AssignedTo|petersen@redhat.com |cchance@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2010-02-25 05:30:53 EST --- Hm I thought we already had a baekmuk-ttf-fonts bug but seems not.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563409
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|cchance@redhat.com |petersen@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563409
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2010-04-21 22:43:01 EDT --- Thanks - baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-25.fc13 fixes this problem for me. :)
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 578017 ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563409
Bug 563409 depends on bug 546490, which changed state.
Bug 546490 Summary: fontconfig-2.8.0-1 changes default Monospace font from DejaVu Sans Mono to Baekmuk Gulim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546490
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org