https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981475
Bug ID: 981475 Summary: Improper glyph names in Lohit fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: lohit-fonts Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: extras-orphan@fedoraproject.org Reporter: khaledhosny@eglug.org QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: extras-orphan@fedoraproject.org, fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen@redhat.com, pnemade@redhat.com, psatpute@redhat.com
For purposes of text extraction from PDF files, glyphs should be named in accordance with Adobe Glyph Naming convention (http://www.adobe.com/devnet/opentype/archives/glyph.html). Most glyphs in Lohit fonts follow this convention properly, but some do not. I did not do an extensive review, but I noticed several occurances of glyph names like:
u0919_u094D.half_u0915_u094D.half.half
Which is wrong, since step 1 of the mapping algorithm in the above link will drop the part of glyph name after the first occurence of a peroid, so only u0919_u094D will remain which is assume is not what is wanted here. A proper name would then be:
u0919_u094D_u0915_u094D.half.half.half
or something like that (the part after the peroid is completely ignored, so it can be anything).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981475
Khaled Hosny khaledhosny@eglug.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |FreeDesktop.org 66597
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981475
Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lohit-devel-list@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com --- Thanks for raising this issues. This is really important. I will try to fix this in coming few months.
Gone through the adobe AGL. So name should be
"string_text_with_underscore"."end_here"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981475
Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|extras-orphan@fedoraproject |psatpute@redhat.com |.org |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981475
--- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com --- With the Lohit2 project we are redoing all stuff.
Just done release of Lohit-Devanagari 2.91.0, it fixes this issue.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/lohit-devel-list/2013-October/msg00001.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981475
Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2015-03-31 05:02:50
--- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com --- This bug has been resolved. with latest Lohit releases.
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org