Bug ID: 1126249
Summary: Component Description of mozc in bugzilla should be
self-contained, and shouldn't rely on other
trademarked product name
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 923718
Component Description says Mozc is "Opensourced Google Japanese Input"
Description of problem:
When you select Mozc in bugzilla.redhat.com
, the Component Description says it
is "Opensourced Google Japanese Input". However, OSS Mozc and Google Japanese
Input are different products. IANAL, but I feel the description of OSS Mozc
should be self-contained, and shouldn't rely on other trademarked product name.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora
2. Type 'Mozc' in Component section
Component Description says it is "Opensourced Google Japanese Input". See the
Component Description should be carefully chosen here because OSS Mozc and
Google Japanese Input are different products. One idea is using the same
description of mozc.spec. What do you think?
Current description of mozc.spec looks a bit obsolete because now Android is
also supported in OSS Mozc. It would be nice if the description of mozc.spec
is also updated.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug