https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126249
Bug ID: 1126249
Summary: Component Description of mozc in bugzilla should be
self-contained, and shouldn't rely on other
trademarked product name
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: mozc
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: yukawa(a)google.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 923718
-->
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=923718&action=edit
Component Description says Mozc is "Opensourced Google Japanese Input"
Description of problem:
When you select Mozc in
bugzilla.redhat.com, the Component Description says it
is "Opensourced Google Japanese Input". However, OSS Mozc and Google Japanese
Input are different products. IANAL, but I feel the description of OSS Mozc
should be self-contained, and shouldn't rely on other trademarked product name.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora
2. Type 'Mozc' in Component section
Actual results:
Component Description says it is "Opensourced Google Japanese Input". See the
attached screenshot.
Expected results:
Component Description should be carefully chosen here because OSS Mozc and
Google Japanese Input are different products. One idea is using the same
description of mozc.spec. What do you think?
Additional info:
Current description of mozc.spec looks a bit obsolete because now Android is
also supported in OSS Mozc. It would be nice if the description of mozc.spec
is also updated.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/mozc.git/tree/mozc.spec?id=6be8b756d03...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Am1nP5Oakm&a=cc_unsubscribe