https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
Bug ID: 873635 QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, nav007@gmail.com, psatpute@redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar@gmail.com Assignee: psatpute@redhat.com Summary: [ml_IN] Meera and Rachana rendering issues with Harfbuzz Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: apeter@redhat.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: smc-fonts Product: Fedora
Description of problem:
Harfbuzz rendering with Meera and Rachana fonts fail for the following cases with test case numbers here http://silpa.org.in/pub/tests/hb/ml/hbview_test_results-2012-11-06/hbview_te...:
Meera: 2. അഥൎവ്വം (ൎdot reph is positioned correctly, but വ്വം is incorrect) 15. ക്ത്ര 19. ഖ്ര 55. സ്പ്ലേ
Rachana: 1. അൎത്ഥം (dot reph not formed) 2. അഥൎവ്വം ((dot reph not formed) 15. ക്ത്ര 19. ഖ്ര 53. സ്പ്രി 54. സ്പ്രേ (Meera does it right)
Thanks Ani
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
--- Comment #1 from Ani Peter apeter@redhat.com --- Bug filed upstream: https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?37675
Thanks Ani
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
--- Comment #2 from Ani Peter apeter@redhat.com --- Please note ഖ + ് + ര must be formed as ഖ്ര. Similar alphabets - ഠ, ഫ, ങ, ഞ, ണ.
Thanks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
--- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com --- Created attachment 639327 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=639327&action=edit patch to fix rakar reodereing
added pref.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
--- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com --- Created attachment 639328 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=639328&action=edit patch to fix rachana rakar reordereing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
Santhosh Thottingal santhosh.thottingal@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |santhosh.thottingal@gmail.c | |om
--- Comment #5 from Santhosh Thottingal santhosh.thottingal@gmail.com --- In the patch r3 xx is ര + ്- this is wrong order for the prebase ra. It should be ് + ര( xx r3)
Tried reversing it in the patch, but that cause other sequences fail(eg: ഗ്ദ്ധ്രോ, ക്ത്രോ ).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
--- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #5)
In the patch r3 xx is ര + ്- this is wrong order for the prebase ra. It should be ് + ര( xx r3)
Tried reversing it in the patch, but that cause other sequences fail(eg: ഗ്ദ്ധ്രോ, ക്ത്രോ ).
We have not changed sequence, just moved sequence it to appropriate feature tag. see the earlier reph in pstf feature, it was using same sequence is -> "r3 xx"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #639327|0 |1 is obsolete| |
--- Comment #7 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com --- Created attachment 639852 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=639852&action=edit this fixes ഗ്ദ്ധ്രോ string as well
I am getting same rendering of ക്ത്രോ in pango and in harfbuzz-ng, so no need to fix it.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
--- Comment #8 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com --- Hi Ani,
I think upstream has done some improvement in this regards, can you just get status update from them?
Then might be we can look at open issues.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
--- Comment #9 from Rajeesh rajeeshknambiar@gmail.com --- The current status is as follows:
Meera: 2. അഥൎവ്വം (ൎdot reph is positioned correctly, but വ്വം is incorrect) - not fixed 15. ക്ത്ര - fixed 19. ഖ്ര - not fixed/cannot be fixed at font level for mlym spec 55. സ്പ്ലേ - not fixed, would need glyph modification
Rachana: 1. അൎത്ഥം (dot reph not formed) - fixed, dot reph is added to Rachana, positioning not correct yet 2. അഥൎവ്വം ((dot reph not formed) - fixed, dot reph added, positioning not correct yet 15. ക്ത്ര - fixed 19. ഖ്ര - not fixed/cannot be fixed at font level for mlym spec 53. സ്പ്രി - fixed 54. സ്പ്രേ (Meera does it right) - fixed
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
--- Comment #10 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com --- Thanks Rajeesh for update. When do you expect next upstream release?
If its bit far, i think we should build smc-fonts in Fedora with patch.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
--- Comment #12 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com --- Hi Rajeesh,
Any further improvement in this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
--- Comment #13 from Rajeesh rajeeshknambiar@gmail.com --- Hi Praveen,
As most of the issues are fixed except ഖ്ര (which cannot be fixed for mlym script), we could do a new release as is. At the same time, discussion related to സ്പ്ലേ is going on in harfbuzz mailing list. Will discuss and update.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
--- Comment #14 from Rajeesh rajeeshknambiar@gmail.com --- Latest status in Rachana:
1. അൎത്ഥം - fixed 2. അഥൎവ്വം - fixed 15. ക്ത്ര - fixed 19. ഖ്ര - not fixed/cannot be fixed at font level for mlym spec 53. സ്പ്രി - fixed 54. സ്പ്രേ - fixed 55. സ്പ്ലേ - not fixed, probably need a contextual lookup (not sure how to)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
--- Comment #15 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com --- Rajeesh, that is really nice.
As harfbuzz is getting integrated at more and more places. (gnome, libreoffice..) i think soonish we need upstream release of this, so that users can get latest version and smc-meera will work seamless with Harfbuzz.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
Rajeesh rajeeshknambiar@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #16 from Rajeesh rajeeshknambiar@gmail.com --- I'm glad to announce that both Rachana and Meera are ported to new mlm2 spec and all these issues are fixed.
Even in old spec, "55. സ്പ്ലേ" is fixed too. We're planning a new release soon, stay tuned!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
Rajeesh rajeeshknambiar@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|psatpute@redhat.com |rajeeshknambiar@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- smc-fonts-5.0.1-7.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/smc-fonts-5.0.1-7.fc19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- smc-fonts-5.0.1-7.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/smc-fonts-5.0.1-7.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- Package smc-fonts-5.0.1-7.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing smc-fonts-5.0.1-7.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-15736/smc-fonts-5.0.1-7.... then log in and leave karma (feedback).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |smc-fonts-5.0.1-7.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2013-09-22 20:29:11
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- smc-fonts-5.0.1-7.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
--- Comment #21 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com --- Rajeesh, do we have this bug open in upstream?
If not i would like to keep this bug open until next upstream release.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
--- Comment #22 from Rajeesh rajeeshknambiar@gmail.com --- Yes, see #comment1 by Ani. We'll use the upstream bug for further developments on this. Thanks Praveen.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
Satyabrata Maitra smaitra@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1023847
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|smc-fonts-5.0.1-7.fc20 |smc-fonts-5.0.1-7.fc19
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- smc-fonts-5.0.1-7.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org