Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: RFE: ibus-setup: in the "Input Method" tab, display an IME configure button next to the IM name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
Summary: RFE: ibus-setup: in the "Input Method" tab, display an IME configure button next to the IM name Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang@gmail.com ReportedBy: harshula@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: tfujiwar@redhat.com, i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, shawn.p.huang@gmail.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
If an IME has a configuration option, then display a button to execute it in the "Input Method" tab alongside the IM name in the list of selected IMs. In some cases there maybe multiple IMs in the list from the same IME. In which case you could display an icon on the button to indicate a set of IMs belong to a particular IME.
Currently you need to first select an IM, activate the IM and then find the IME configure button. I suspect a user would want to configure the IME immediately after selecting the IM.
Apparently the IME configuration is activated by executing a separate binary. In the long term it maybe better for each IME to expose a configure/setup function directly via the IBus framework rather than create a separate binary.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
--- Comment #1 from fujiwara tfujiwar@redhat.com 2010-07-26 23:45:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0)
Apparently the IME configuration is activated by executing a separate binary. In the long term it maybe better for each IME to expose a configure/setup function directly via the IBus framework rather than create a separate binary.
You might think a setup likes SCIM. I think it's a bit difficult discussion. You might think the combined setup is useful but I think the separated setup tools are useful because each engine setup has many configurations. Personally I feel SCIM setup is too condensed.
technically, some IM engines have setups but others don't have. ibus-setup is based on Python so Python setups could be combined but C setup might need another wrapper.
Currently ibus panel icon's left click menu shows the engine setup menu and I think it's more useful than a part of ibus-setup.
One problem is, currently each engine sends the setup menu to ibus only when the IM is on. So even though if you always show ibus languagebar, the setup menu/icon is shown in case IM is on.
However your request might be possible to implement. Let me think a little.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
fujiwara tfujiwar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
--- Comment #2 from fujiwara tfujiwar@redhat.com 2010-07-27 04:07:16 EDT --- This patch is an idea to add engine setup button: http://github.com/fujiwarat/ibus/commit/8e573b5def7ea0f163efda900e19a39b7bab...
Another idea is to modify engine description on engine about dialog. e.g. --- /usr/share/ibus/component/anthy.xml.orig 2010-07-27 11:44:06.000000000 +0900 +++ /usr/share/ibus/component/anthy.xml 2010-07-27 11:56:55.000000000 +0900 @@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ <icon>/usr/share/ibus-anthy/icons/ibus-anthy.png</icon> <layout>jp</layout> <longname>Anthy</longname> - <description>Anthy Input Method</description> + <description>Anthy Input Method +Click <a href=file:///usr/share/libexec/ibus-setup-anthy>setup</a> for the engine configuration.</description> <rank>99</rank> </engine> </engines>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
--- Comment #3 from fujiwara tfujiwar@redhat.com 2010-07-28 03:40:27 EDT --- I discussed this request today. It still seems to need time.
I think there are two options: #1 Continue to discuss the patch on upstream and wait upstream agrees with the patch.
#2 Integrate the current patch as a Fedora branding patch in rawhide (and f13?) and continue to discuss the patch on upstream. (It means we may will modify or delete the integrated patch in the future with the furthermore disucssion.)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|shawn.p.huang@gmail.com |tfujiwar@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com 2010-08-02 02:17:44 EDT --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
--- Comment #5 from fujiwara tfujiwar@redhat.com 2010-08-06 04:13:18 EDT --- Added libxklavier feature. http://github.com/fujiwarat/ibus/commit/38b18273b2d2856ace1d0697470b71e0bc24...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
--- Comment #6 from Harshula Jayasuriya harshula@redhat.com 2010-08-10 02:35:40 EDT --- Two weeks ago I tested RPMs created by Fujiwara containing the patch(es) that adds the preferences button to the "Input Method" tab. The "Input Method" tab looked good and the preferences button was where you would expect it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
--- Comment #7 from fujiwara tfujiwar@redhat.com 2010-08-10 21:13:48 EDT --- Oops, Comment #5 was for another bug. I'll return to this after other priorities are resolved.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
Harshula Jayasuriya harshula@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |medium
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature CC| |tagoh@redhat.com Version|13 |rawhide
--- Comment #8 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2011-05-24 09:00:01 EDT --- According to the comment #0, that sounds like a RFE since there are workaround to configure the IME options. so I've added a FutureFeature tag and moving back to rawhide.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
Harshula Jayasuriya harshula@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen@redhat.com
--- Comment #9 from Harshula Jayasuriya harshula@redhat.com 2011-11-11 00:56:33 EST --- Is this ever going to be fixed? Particularly considering there was a working fix back in 2010.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
fujiwara tfujiwar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_DEV
--- Comment #10 from fujiwara tfujiwar@redhat.com 2011-11-25 05:49:22 EST --- Now ibus_engine_desc_new_varargs() is supported so we can add the new property in engine xml files. '<setup>' will be used additionally. https://github.com/fujiwarat/ibus/commit/e7a722948025948f39ac8e7f9d5527a79f2...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |MODIFIED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-28 04:09:10 EST --- ibus-1.4.0-13.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-1.4.0-13.fc16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-29 21:11:46 EST --- ibus-1.4.0-14.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-1.4.0-14.fc16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-06 00:03:09 EST --- ibus-1.4.0-14.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-1.4.0-14.fc16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
--- Comment #14 from Harshula Jayasuriya harshula@redhat.com 2011-12-06 00:43:45 EST --- When I press "Preferences" for "wijesekera (m17n)", I get the following in the terminal that I used to run ibus-setup: --------------------------------------------- can't determine IBus engine name; use --name ---------------------------------------------
# rpm -qa | grep ^ibus | sort ibus-1.4.0-14.fc16.x86_64 ibus-gnome3-1.4.0-14.fc16.x86_64 ibus-gtk2-1.4.0-14.fc16.x86_64 ibus-gtk3-1.4.0-14.fc16.x86_64 ibus-libs-1.4.0-14.fc16.x86_64 ibus-m17n-1.3.3-6.fc16.x86_64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
--- Comment #15 from fujiwara tfujiwar@redhat.com 2011-12-06 01:11:45 EST --- (In reply to comment #14)
When I press "Preferences" for "wijesekera (m17n)", I get the following in the terminal that I used to run ibus-setup:
Probably it's good to file a bug for ibus-m17n.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
Daiki Ueno dueno@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugzilla.redhat.com | |/show_bug.cgi?id=760427
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
--- Comment #16 from Harshula Jayasuriya harshula@redhat.com 2011-12-08 00:40:55 EST --- After updating ibus-m17n to Bug 760427 's koji build, it works.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-10 14:45:13 EST --- Package ibus-1.4.0-14.fc16: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ibus-1.4.0-14.fc16' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-16873/ibus-1.4.0-14.fc16 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618229
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |ibus-1.4.0-14.fc16 Resolution| |ERRATA Last Closed| |2011-12-21 12:10:04
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-21 12:10:04 EST --- ibus-1.4.0-14.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org