[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 556551] New: [abrt] crash in ibus-1.2.0.20091204-2.fc12

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: [abrt] crash in ibus-1.2.0.20091204-2.fc12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556551

Summary: [abrt] crash in ibus-1.2.0.20091204-2.fc12
           Product: Fedora
           Version: 12
          Platform: i686
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
 Status Whiteboard: abrt_hash:87031497776eb697f15e9313fe995dfcbfd21411
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: ibus
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]
         QAContact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail], [e-mail]
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora

abrt 1.0.3 detected a crash.

Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: python /usr/share/ibus/ui/gtk/main.py
component: ibus
executable: /usr/bin/python
kernel: 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.i686.PAE
package: ibus-1.2.0.20091204-2.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process was terminated by signal 11 (Segmentation fault)

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 556551] [abrt] crash in ibus-1.2.0.20091204-2.fc12

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556551

--- Comment #1 from atgf0127  2010-01-18 12:34:19 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=385153)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=385153)
File: backtrace

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 556551] [abrt] crash in ibus-1.2.0.20091204-2.fc12

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556551

Peng Huang  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]
          Component|ibus                        |gtk2
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]           |[e-mail]

--- Comment #2 from Peng Huang  2010-01-18 20:56:35 EST ---
Probably the problem is in gtk or pygtk.

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 556551] [abrt] crash in ibus-1.2.0.20091204-2.fc12

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556551

Parag  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]
               Flag|                            |needinfo?([e-mail])

--- Comment #3 from Parag  2010-09-02 05:39:37 EDT ---
Please provide steps to reproduce this crash otherwise I see ibus is working
fine for me. Also ibus is now updated to 1.3.6 in F12

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 556551] [abrt] crash in ibus-1.2.0.20091204-2.fc12

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556551

Tajidin Abdullah  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #4 from Tajidin Abdullah  2010-09-07 03:47:05 EDT ---

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 556551] [abrt] crash in ibus-1.2.0.20091204-2.fc12

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556551

Parag  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |INSUFFICIENT_DATA
               Flag|needinfo?([e-mail]) |
        Last Closed|                            |2010-09-30 02:30:13

--- Comment #5 from Parag  2010-09-30 02:30:13 EDT ---
I suppose we had enough waiting here.