On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 13:26 +0530, sankarshan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Ankur
Sinha<sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 11:15 +0530, sankarshan wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Ankur Sinha<sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> > This is because everyone that requests a media does not turn into a
>> > local contact. The media is not following the "receiver becomes
donor"
>> > scheme that we want it to.
>>
>> We never did visualize the "receiver becomes donor" way of paying it
>> forward. The idea was to de-lineate the LocalContacts from the "free"
>> FreeMedia aspect. Which in plain terms means that the LCs should be
>> able to project that they are charging for the media.
>
> I don't understand the last sentence. "project that they are charging
> for the media" meaning?
The LocalContacts should be able to represent with clarity that they
are/would be charging for the media is probably an apt way to phrase
that sentence.
/sankarshan
The essential clarification needed is whether they would charge only the
cost of media + postage or would there also be a "service charge"?
--
regards,
Ankur