On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Ankur Sinha<sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 11:15 +0530, sankarshan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Ankur Sinha<sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is because everyone that requests a media does not turn into a
> > local contact. The media is not following the "receiver becomes
donor"
> > scheme that we want it to.
>
> We never did visualize the "receiver becomes donor" way of paying it
> forward. The idea was to de-lineate the LocalContacts from the "free"
> FreeMedia aspect. Which in plain terms means that the LCs should be
> able to project that they are charging for the media.
I don't understand the last sentence. "project that they are charging
for the media" meaning?
The LocalContacts should be able to represent with clarity that they
are/would be charging for the media is probably an apt way to phrase
that sentence.
/sankarshan
--
http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literature digitally re-published
http://www.plos.org - Public Library of Science
http://www.creativecommons.org - Flexible copyright for creative work