Hi Rahul,
I have an issue with %configure macro.
When I do "./configure --prefix=/usr", it builds perfectly but if I
use %configure build fails for 64 bit. After examining the log of both
the build I found that %configure passes a lot of parameters while
"./configure --prefix=/usr" does not. How can I fix this error?
Failed build's log:
India
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Aditya Patawari <adimania(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Packaged! Need someone to review it.
Bugzilla Link:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684446
--
Aditya Patawari
http://blog.adityapatawari.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adimania
India
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Aditya Patawari <adimania(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I have informed upstream regarding an error of undeclared variable.
> The post is under moderation. I'll update the url as soon as it is
> moderated.
>
> --
> Aditya Patawari
>
http://blog.adityapatawari.com/
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adimania
> India
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 03/09/2011 08:45 PM, Aditya Patawari wrote:
>>> Hi Rahul,
>>>
>>> It is not written anywhere that GPL is being used but I found the
>>> notice below in one of the files:
>>>
>>> #
>>> # Copyright (c) 2009 Mark Heily <mark(a)heily.com>
>>> #
>>> # Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any
>>> # purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
>>> # copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
>>> #
>>> # THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL
WARRANTIES
>>> # WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
>>> # MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR
>>> # ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES
>>> # WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN
>>> # ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
>>> # OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
>>> #
>>>
>>> Should I assume it is GPLed or write to the developer about the license?
>>
>> This is not GPL at all. Usually libraries are not licensed under GPL.
>> This is a MIT license, specifically old style with a legal disclaimer.
>>
>>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT#Old_Style_with_legal_disclaim...
>>
>> Use the license tag "MIT" for this variant.
>>
>> Rahul
>> _______________________________________________
>> india mailing list
>> india(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/india
>>
>