Hello,
I've recently been packaging applications for the fedora medical initiative. There are quite a few of them. If you have some time to spare, please review a few (or just one). Even if you're not a sponsored packager, I encourage you to please review them unofficially. It will improve your understanding of the guidelines, and also pick out quite a few errors and help me :)
Of course, if you accept a ticket, I will review a package for you in return :)
Please have a look at the following url:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673841
The ones needing reviews are the ones in the "depends on" field.
Thanks, Ankur
Hi Ankur,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.ankur@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've recently been packaging applications for the fedora medical initiative. There are quite a few of them. If you have some time to spare, please review a few (or just one). Even if you're not a sponsored packager, I encourage you to please review them unofficially. It will improve your understanding of the guidelines, and also pick out quite a few errors and help me :)
Of course, if you accept a ticket, I will review a package for you in return :)
Please have a look at the following url:
It would be useful if you include devel list too. Thanks.
Also, the table that you created might be more useful. http://bit.ly/j9eK14
Thanks.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.ankur@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 11:24 -0600, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
It would be useful if you include devel list too. Thanks.
Looking at the table, I think it would be nice to have different priority for dependencies which are blocking other packages. Right now, there is no way to tell.
Thanks.
-
Ankur Sinha -
susmit shannigrahi