Hi,
I was looking to query FAS to figure out how many people are from India and was pointed to
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/y/python-fedora/doc/api.html#fedora-acco...
With python-fedora, we should be able to get the details, I think. Anyone, care to look at this? It would be useful for gathering some metrics and potentially get in touch, assuming the privacy policy allows that.
Rahul
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Rahul Sundaram sundaram@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi,
I was looking to query FAS to figure out how many people are from India and was pointed to
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/y/python-fedora/doc/api.html#fedora-acco...
With python-fedora, we should be able to get the details, I think. Anyone, care to look at this? It would be useful for gathering some metrics and potentially get in touch, assuming the privacy policy allows that.
Let me look into it...time permitting. May be in a couple of days?
susmit shannigrahi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Rahul Sundaram sundaram@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi,
I was looking to query FAS to figure out how many people are from India and was pointed to
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/y/python-fedora/doc/api.html#fedora-acco...
With python-fedora, we should be able to get the details, I think. Anyone, care to look at this? It would be useful for gathering some metrics and potentially get in touch, assuming the privacy policy allows that.
Let me look into it...time permitting. May be in a couple of days?
Susmit,
Did you have time to look at this? Since you are already dropping mails to ambassadors, you might want to invite them to this list and ask them to introduce themselves. I suspect many of them are still not aware that this list exists or not subscribed to it yet.
Rahul
2009/3/1 Rahul Sundaram sundaram@fedoraproject.org: [..]
Let me look into it...time permitting. May be in a couple of days?
Susmit,
Did you have time to look at this? Since you are already dropping mails to ambassadors, you might want to invite them to this list and ask them to introduce themselves. I suspect many of them are still not aware that this list exists or not subscribed to it yet.
Hello,
I did had a look at it long long back and as far as I can recall the API for filtering acc. to places was not implemented. I will recheck and see if it is working and confirm in day or two.
-- Regards, Rakesh Pandit
Hi
I did check it today and i was unable to segregate Users based on country_code as country_code is not implemented in people_by_key() API as well as in people_by_id(). i tried changing the code of fas2.py and its like the FAS Server needs to be updated if i were to use people_by_key(). Hence i have kept it on hold.
Cheers, Balaji
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pandit@gmail.comwrote:
2009/3/1 Rahul Sundaram sundaram@fedoraproject.org: [..]
Let me look into it...time permitting. May be in a couple of days?
Susmit,
Did you have time to look at this? Since you are already dropping mails
to
ambassadors, you might want to invite them to this list and ask them to introduce themselves. I suspect many of them are still not aware that
this
list exists or not subscribed to it yet.
Hello,
I did had a look at it long long back and as far as I can recall the API for filtering acc. to places was not implemented. I will recheck and see if it is working and confirm in day or two.
-- Regards, Rakesh Pandit
Fedora-india mailing list Fedora-india@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-india
2009/3/1 G balajig81@gmail.com:
Hi
I did check it today and i was unable to segregate Users based on country_code as country_code is not implemented in people_by_key() API as well as in people_by_id(). i tried changing the code of fas2.py and its like the FAS Server needs to be updated if i were to use people_by_key(). Hence i have kept it on hold.
I guess that was the case when I last checked. Will see if it can be patched easily(on server side). Why don't you give a try ? If interested check out fix and catch Toshio on #fedora-devel or #fedora-admin for some help.
I would suggest: if it is easy, patch it up and send it to him and then chat.
-- Regards, Rakesh Pandit
Did you have time to look at this? Since you are already dropping mails to ambassadors, you might want to invite them to this list and ask them to introduce themselves. I suspect many of them are still not aware that this list exists or not subscribed to it yet.
That I shall do. And no, I am so very sorry to say, I didn't find reasonable time to get it done. :( I thought I could, but ...
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pandit@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/1 G balajig81@gmail.com:
Hi
I did check it today and i was unable to segregate Users based on country_code as country_code is not implemented in people_by_key() API as well as in people_by_id(). i tried changing the code of fas2.py and its like the FAS Server needs to be updated if i were to use people_by_key(). Hence i have kept it on hold.
I suspect that is more of a policy than a bug. FAS doesn't let others (even admins) see the country info if someone has chosen to keep his/her information private.
FAmSCo is trying to get (atleast) read access to it, so that we can utilise it better.
Let's see.
2009/3/2 susmit shannigrahi wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
2009/3/1 G wrote:
Hi
I did check it today and i was unable to segregate Users based on country_code as country_code is not implemented in people_by_key() API as well as in people_by_id(). i tried changing the code of fas2.py and its like the FAS Server needs to be updated if i were to use people_by_key(). Hence i have kept it on hold.
I suspect that is more of a policy than a bug. FAS doesn't let others (even admins) see the country info if someone has chosen to keep his/her information private.
I have that in mind and there is a check box which asks acc. holders to mark whether they can make this info available. And policy needs to be implemented in code.
API should use if(marked_true) return country else raise someexception. So, it needs a fix.
FAmSCo is trying to get (atleast) read access to it, so that we can utilise it better.
Let's see.
Ok