I am new to the fedora infrastructure group. I am going throug few of the links in the site to get a feel of the work. I have submitted my .ssh_rsa_key.pub from the site. I think I will get some intimation on this. Please someone can let me know further proceedings from here onwards.
Regards & Thanks Prabir Senapati mailto: senapati2001(a)yahoo.com
I'm interested to know the status of the blogs instances in the
I would like to use the blog and the planet as news/story board for the
local fedora communities website .
* About the blog, Is something work in progress? I saw a nice
infrastructure but with some work more to do:
- are you aware that the css has some class broken? like the images are
not correctly shown?
- do you think is possible to customize also the left bar?
* about the planet, are there any plans to create a multi-instance,
planet, maybe by country or by language?
let me know
We have a number of el5-ish repos on infrastructure.fp.o. I've been using
one of them over and over and over again this week building and testing
something in mock and I noticed that we don't seem to have the sqlite dbs
built for these repos.
So my change request is to rebuild those repos with the database creation
If we encounter any oddnesses or new bugs I can revert the change
Can I get a couple of +1's to this?
My name is Ameya Sathe. I have done my undergraduation in Information Technology,Engineering degree( programming oriented courseware. ).
I am a RedHat Certified Engineer(RHCE). Since last 2 years; I am teaching the RedHat Designed Courseware for RHCE in Pune,Maharashtra,India. Also; I am teaching PHP.
I can help out with respect to system administration. I can also help out in spotting any technical or documentational bugs.
With Warm Regards,
The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo.com/
The recent pkgdb update broke fedoracommunity. I have since applied a a
couple of simple, low-risk fixes to get things working again. I wish to
push the version in staging out into production.
This code also contains a fix for the bug that caused fedoracommunity to
flip out when it couldn't access fedorapeople.org, as well as a new
Can I get some +1's?
Christopher Aillon brought up a problem in the current icon code for
PackageDB. It seems that mozilla is sensitive to the icon that is
associated with the firefox web browser. So we shouldn't be showing icons
other than the default or hicolor icon set for firefox or risk trademark
I've removed the other icons from the pkgdb for now but newer packages with
icons for firefox that get imported into the database could potentially
occur at any time.
Martin Bacovsky has a small patch for pkgdb that prioritises the themes that
are used when choosing an icon. That should be enough to always choose
a proper icon for displaying alongside firefox.
Could I get two +1s for applying this to the app servers?
=== modified file 'pkgdb/applications.py'
--- pkgdb/applications.py 2010-03-15 16:26:59 +0000
+++ pkgdb/applications.py 2010-03-25 12:30:12 +0000
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
from pkgdb.model import Comment, Application, Icon, IconName, PackageBuild
from pkgdb.model import Tag, Usage, ApplicationUsage, ApplicationTag
-from pkgdb.model import MimeType
+from pkgdb.model import MimeType, Theme
from pkgdb.lib.utils import mod_grp
from pkgdb import release, _
from pkgdb.lib.text_utils import excerpt
@@ -531,15 +531,18 @@
def show(self, *app_name):
app_name = '/'.join(app_name)
- # TODO: themes
- icon_data = session.query(Icon.icon)\
- .join(Icon.name, IconName.applications)\
+ icon_data = session.query(Theme.name, Icon.icon)\
+ .join(Icon.name, IconName.applications, Icon.theme)\
if not icon_data:
- return str(icon_data)
+ icons = dict(icon_data)
+ # icon theme priority: default > hicolor > whatever
+ return str(icons.get('default', None) or icons.get('hicolor', None) or icons[icons.keys()])
20:00 < mmcgrath> #startmeeting Infrastructure
20:00 < zodbot> Meeting started Thu Mar 25 20:00:19 2010 UTC. The chair is mmcgrath. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
20:00 < mmcgrath> Who's here?
20:00 * skvidal is here
20:00 < zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
20:00 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: (Meeting topic: Infrastructure)
20:00 * lmacken
20:00 * a-k is here
20:00 -!- djf_jeff [~jeff(a)188.8.131.52] has joined #fedora-meeting
20:01 -!- rwmjones [~rjones(a)94-30-104-162.xdsl.murphx.net] has quit Ping timeout: 248 seconds
20:01 -!- inode0 [~inode0@fedora/inode0] has joined #fedora-meeting
20:02 < mmcgrath> #topic Fedora 13 beta
20:02 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Fedora 13 beta (Meeting topic: Infrastructure)
20:02 < mmcgrath> hah
20:02 < mmcgrath> Lets get started
20:02 < mmcgrath> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/report/9
20:03 < mmcgrath> .ticket 2058
20:03 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #2058 (Verify Mirror Space) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2058
20:03 < mmcgrath> I'll get this one
20:03 < mmcgrath> .ticket 2059
20:03 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #2059 (Release Day ticket) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2059
20:03 < mmcgrath> This one's just a tracker ticket. I'll take it too
20:03 < mmcgrath> .ticket 2060
20:03 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #2060 (Verify releng permissions) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2060
20:03 < mmcgrath> smooge: want to get that one again?
20:04 < mmcgrath> we'll come back to that.
20:04 < mmcgrath> .tiny 2061
20:04 < zodbot> mmcgrath: Error: '2061' is not a valid url.
20:05 < mmcgrath> .ticket 2061
20:05 < mmcgrath> sorry :/
20:05 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #2061 (MM redirects) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2061
20:05 < mmcgrath> mdomsch usually gets this one (I believe it's automated now and just requires verification)
20:05 < mmcgrath> .ticket 2062
20:05 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #2062 (Infrastructure Change Freeze) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2062
20:05 < mmcgrath> I'll get that, we are frozen.
20:05 < smooge> morning
20:05 < smooge> sorry got stuck on phone
20:05 < mmcgrath> smooge: hey, want to get 2060?
20:05 < smooge> yes
20:05 < mmcgrath> k
20:05 < mmcgrath> and the last ticket
20:06 < mmcgrath> .ticket 2063 doesn't need to be done until after the launch
20:06 < smooge> could I get 2058 .. I find them related
20:06 < zodbot> mmcgrath: Error: "2063 doesn't need to be done until after the launch" is not a valid integer.
20:06 < smooge> hehheeh
20:06 -!- djf_jeff [~jeff(a)184.108.40.206] has quit Quit: I quit
20:06 < mmcgrath> zodbot: you are testing me!
20:06 < mmcgrath> ok, anyone have any questions or comments related to the release?
20:06 < mmcgrath> Oxf13: you around?
20:07 < Oxf13> I am
20:07 < mmcgrath> what are our odds of slipping at the moment?
20:07 < Oxf13> I'd put it at 50% chance
20:07 -!- biertie [~bert@fedora/biertie] has joined #fedora-meeting
20:07 < Oxf13> There is one blocker we're worried about, but we have a patch in hand, it just needs testing, then I can make the RC
20:07 < skvidal> mmcgrath: so - when it's a 50% chance of rain - you carry an umbrella :)
20:07 < mmcgrath> cool.
20:07 < Oxf13> we have a compressed amount of time to test the RC
20:08 < Oxf13> and not really any time to fix anything that's wrong with the RC and validate a second RC before the go / no go time
20:08 < mmcgrath> Oxf13: I'll work with you later today or tomorrow to verify mirror space, we expecting this to be the same size(ish) as the alpha?
20:08 < Oxf13> yes
20:08 < mmcgrath> k, sounds good.
20:08 < mmcgrath> If no one has anything else, I'll move on?
20:08 * smooge remembers the days of having 8 or 9 RC's
20:09 < smooge> nothing else
20:09 < mmcgrath> #topic func updates
20:09 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: func updates (Meeting topic: Infrastructure)
20:09 < mmcgrath> So after some coding and some testing, the func updates before the freeze went pretty well I thought.
20:09 < skvidal> does anyone else want to work on that project?
20:09 < mmcgrath> still a few kinks to work out but it was much easier then our current method and required much less attention.
20:09 < mmcgrath> skvidal: as in you're done with it or want some help?
20:10 < skvidal> want some help
20:10 < skvidal> I got asked to work on something else this week
20:10 < mmcgrath> skvidal: I have some cycles during the freeze. though I can't promise I won't make things worse :)
20:10 < skvidal> and that's been taking my focus
20:11 < skvidal> so it's not dropped
20:11 < mmcgrath> skvidal: well I'm sure I'll be pinging you soon(ish)
20:11 < skvidal> but I won't be able to spend as much time on it until I get the mock vm stuff out
20:11 < mmcgrath> <nod>
20:11 < mmcgrath> anyone else have questions or comments on that?
20:11 < skvidal> the func+yum thing is lightweight
20:11 < skvidal> and entry-level easy to work on
20:11 < skvidal> http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb/skvidal/func-yum.git
20:12 < skvidal> lots of easy wins
20:12 < mmcgrath> skvidal: thanks
20:12 < mmcgrath> Ok, next topic
20:12 < mmcgrath> #topic Collectd
20:12 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Collectd (Meeting topic: Infrastructure)
20:12 < mmcgrath> So we've been using collectd for a bit now.
20:12 < mmcgrath> what do people think?
20:12 < abadger1999> skvidal: Thanks for getting func working well again.
20:12 < skvidal> abadger1999: so much to do to make things 'well'
20:12 < smooge> skvidal, I would like to help
20:12 < skvidal> but it is unbroken
20:13 < abadger1999> :-)
20:13 < smooge> my python is broken, but I really want to help
20:13 < smooge> sorry meant help on func
20:13 < smooge> collectd I have found useful
20:13 < abadger1999> mmcgrath: It's helped us fix something already. It's generally good.
20:13 < smooge> looking at app04 I can see where it is heavily running into some issues
20:13 < mmcgrath> smooge: me too, we've already found several problems just by having it in place.
20:14 < skvidal> what did collectd help you fix?
20:14 -!- rwmjones [~rjones(a)94-30-104-162.xdsl.murphx.net] has joined #fedora-meeting
20:14 < mmcgrath> skvidal: it helpped us find the outage blips as being realted to db2.
20:14 < skvidal> ah
20:14 < skvidal> cool
20:14 -!- pcalarco_afk [~pcalarco@fedora/pcalarco] has quit Quit: Ex-Chat
20:15 < mmcgrath> other tools could have found it, but just the way we have it setup right now (every 10s) allowed us to see that load spike in such a short window was related to disk, and even more then that disk writes.
20:15 < mmcgrath> which got us looking.
20:15 < mmcgrath> and while it's not totally fixed I do think we're in better shape. I think we just need to adjust our backup system a bit.
20:15 < mmcgrath> but that'll be a post-freeze thing.
20:15 < mmcgrath> so here's the only got'cha with collectd.
20:15 < skvidal> its a massive suck?
20:15 < mmcgrath> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/collectd/bin/index.cgi?hostname=log01&plu...
20:15 < mmcgrath> heh
20:16 < mmcgrath> it's the disk IO required to do rrd files.
20:16 < mmcgrath> there's lots of tricks we can (and do) use to fix that.
20:16 < mmcgrath> but as we grow, it's something to watch.
20:16 < mmcgrath> you'll notice that on the 19th I figured out that automatically polling every tcp port in use and recording that info was too expensive for us :)
20:16 < mmcgrath> duh
20:16 < mmcgrath> but yeah, something to watch.
20:17 < mmcgrath> there's also non-rrdtool collection methods we can use if we really need to that would also be useful
20:17 < mmcgrath> anywho, anyone have any questions on that?
20:17 < mmcgrath> I've been slowly adding more useful stuff
20:17 < mmcgrath> like -
20:17 < mmcgrath> .tiny https://admin.fedoraproject.org/collectd/bin/index.cgi?hostname=db1&plugi...
20:17 < zodbot> mmcgrath: http://tinyurl.com/ye6nrvl
20:18 < mmcgrath> anywho, no more questions there so that's good.
20:18 < mmcgrath> #topic Monitoring
20:18 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Monitoring (Meeting topic: Infrastructure)
20:18 < smooge> mmcgrath, we did rrdtools in a ram drive
20:18 < mmcgrath> smooge: yeah that's basically what some of the tunables in the rrdtool plugin do.
20:18 < mmcgrath> Ok, so we're basically back to nagios and collectd.
20:19 < smooge> yeah.. we set it up like /var/spool/mqueue/t and had a 2 GB partition for it ..
20:19 < mmcgrath> hydh has been working on some stuff but I know he's been busy
20:19 < smooge> I want to say our community help on nagios has been cool
20:19 < smooge> and great
20:19 < mmcgrath> I'd like to get some basic event handlers finalized as well as proper deps in place.
20:19 < mmcgrath> smooge: indeed
20:20 < mmcgrath> anyone have any questions about what we're up to in nagios and where we're headed?
20:20 < mmcgrath> alrighty, well with that
20:20 < mmcgrath> #topic Open Floor
20:20 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Open Floor (Meeting topic: Infrastructure)
20:20 < mmcgrath> anyone have anything they'd like to discuss?
20:20 < mmcgrath> a-k: anything new on search engines?
20:20 -!- XulLunch is now known as XulWork
20:21 < a-k> I'm still looking at mnoGoSearch with PostgreSQL
20:21 < a-k> I haven't had a chance to try crawling with it yet, but if it goes well I'll put it in pub test next week
20:21 < a-k> BTW is there a preference for MySQL vs PostgreSQL? I know/think we have them both around....
20:21 < dgilmore> a-k: no preference
20:21 < a-k> I'm okay with that. That's about it for now.
20:22 < mmcgrath> anyone have anything else they'd like to discuss/
20:22 < gholms> Random question?
20:22 < gholms> Did you folks notice the collectd server-side daemon putting a lot of load on the machine? I ask because that's what I experienced at $dayjob.
20:23 < mmcgrath> gholms: yeah, we fixed it with the suggestions here...
20:23 * mmcgrath gets link
20:23 < mmcgrath> http://collectd.org/wiki/index.php/Inside_the_RRDtool_plugin
20:24 < gholms> Ooh, that looks useful. Thanks.
20:24 < mmcgrath> gholms: yup yup
20:24 < smooge> 1) going to work on log reviews over freeze. Now that we have over 50% free logs I was going to see what I could get out of it daily.
20:24 < smooge> I think someone else was working on this earlier so will hook up with them and see where it goes
20:24 < mmcgrath> smooge: cool
20:24 < mmcgrath> yeah someone was but I don't know the status
20:25 < smooge> then I am pretty much building my home/slicehost network to 'clone' F-I so I can test stuff here a bit better.
20:25 < smooge> my goal will be to see how far I can take epylog before it screams in terror at our data
20:25 < mmcgrath> smooge: sounds good, let us know if you need anything
20:25 < mmcgrath> well me
20:25 < mmcgrath> :)
20:26 -!- fab_ [~bellet(a)bellet.info] has quit Ping timeout: 248 seconds
20:26 < mmcgrath> ok, well with that I'll close the meeting in 30
20:26 < mmcgrath> 15
20:26 < mmcgrath> #endmeeting
20:26 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Channel is used by various Fedora groups and committees for their regular meetings | Note that meetings often get logged | For questions about using Fedora please ask in #fedora | See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Meeting_channel for meeting schedule
20:26 < zodbot> Meeting ended Thu Mar 25 20:26:56 2010 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot .
20:27 < mmcgrath> thanks for coming everyone!
20:27 < zodbot> Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-03-25/fedora-meeting...
20:27 < zodbot> Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-03-25/fedora-meeting...
20:27 < zodbot> Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-03-25/fedora-meeting...