On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Mike McGrath<mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Mike McGrath<mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > I'm not sure if we have any memcached experience on the list but I thought
> > I'd ask. Can anyone explain this:
> > http://pastebin.ca/1481219
> > Notice how memcached1 has a much higher hit rate and memcached2 has a much
> > lower hit rate?
> The time for memcached1 is 5x less than memcached2 being up. That can
> have an effect on caching as right after a system comes up its rates
> are usually much higher and then over time fall off (iirc). I think it
> would take bringing both up at the same time to figure out if there is
> a true disparity over caching.
I thought that exact same thing :)
STAT uptime 9143
STAT get_hits 311736
STAT get_misses 11255
STAT uptime 9144
STAT get_hits 49679
STAT get_misses 11116
Now that shows something not kosher. My guess is some app is not
talking to both? What apps use memcached for what?
Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"