On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Mike
McGrath<mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure if we have any memcached experience on the list but I thought
> I'd ask. Can anyone explain this:
>
>
http://pastebin.ca/1481219
>
> Notice how memcached1 has a much higher hit rate and memcached2 has a much
> lower hit rate?
>
The time for memcached1 is 5x less than memcached2 being up. That can
have an effect on caching as right after a system comes up its rates
are usually much higher and then over time fall off (iirc). I think it
would take bringing both up at the same time to figure out if there is
a true disparity over caching.
I thought that exact same thing :)
memcahed1:
STAT uptime 9143
STAT get_hits 311736
STAT get_misses 11255
memcached2:
STAT uptime 9144
STAT get_hits 49679
STAT get_misses 11116
-Mike