On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 06:36:42AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:38:52 -0400
"Paul W. Frields" <stickster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 07:22:44PM -0500, David Shier wrote:
> > I think this is a good idea, maybe add a sub header similar to
> > 'technical project sites in this region' to differentiate between
> > something that is a more or less general community forum and the
> > ones where you've got development types that likely want more
> > focused conversation related to their projects.
> Reminder since snipped: The context is that I recommended we use
> *.fedoracommunity.org for projects outside regular support from the
> infrastructure team, but which are good to associate with Fedora
> overall, with COPR being an example.
Hum, I am not sure copr is a good example, but perhaps I
misunderstood. :) I was thinking this was additive with other stuff:
-> fully supported
-> lesser support
(right now, I would say copr is here, but moving to the first one)
-> even less
-> we don't run it, but it's associated.
I like this way of dividing our support and make clear what we run and what we
> What do we need to do to make this happen, if there are no
* we need a writeup on the wiki and/or infra-docs with this setup.
* we need to put everything into one of the levels and get feedback
The devel/devel-announce lists? Or would we have a better place to get this