On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:42:34PM -0700, Luke Macken wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 03:11:17PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> So, what I would like to ask is:
> * what do you think of the project? Worth pursuing or not?
Love it. Totally worth pursuing :)
Cool, thanks :)
> * Where should it live?
I'm all for keeping it distro-agnostic, but having a Powered by OpenShift
button on there couldn't hurt :P
That's a nice idea but makes me wonder two things:
- Can I run cron job on OpenShift?
- If so and if we go the OpenShift way, we would need to figure out how to
set-up fedmsg as the cron job sends fedmsg notifications
> * Domain name suggestions? (release-monitoring.org
> <insert here you own idea>?)
is decent, anything with the name cnucnu in it
will be confusing, but part of me thinks it should contain the word
Do you envision any sort of API for this? We've wanted to have an 'Upstream
Summary' section in the fedora-packages app for a while now.
So having an API that we could hit to get the SCM type/url and latest version
would be nice :)
There is a little API already but it doesn't contain the SCM information
present in the mockup. What could be added is the 'Lastest version upstream',
I'll need to add a new endpoint providing the project information for the
project name of a specified distro
It also feels like cnucnu is the Right Place to house DOAP metadata