On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 07:35, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:21 AM Kamil Páral <kparal@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:19 AM Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; wrote:
> >
> >
> > It will be nice but I am not aware of any other system in place which would
> > replace checks performed by autocloud.
> >
> > (CC'ed tflink and kparal)
> > Does taskotron provides capability to perform tests on Fedora cloud Images
> > like booting images and other basic checks?
>
> (My email to the list was rejected because I'm not subscribed, let me try again from the web UI...)
>
> Theoretically it is possible using nested virt. However, Taskotron is going away as well. The replacement is Fedora CI:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/
>

But Fedora CI is broken and/or vaporware. How can we replace Taskotron
with that?


Honestly.. weren't we saying the same damn thing about taskotron until Fedora CI became the latest thing to rail about. It was constantly 'why do you spend time on this broken crap' and then it becomes the 'oh why are you replacing my favorite thing in the world'. I am pretty sure there are multiple thesis and doctorates on the codependency that OpenSource developers exhibit.. 

 
Also, I don't relish the idea of writing Ansible playbooks for tests.
And I imagine most other folks don't. We don't need a Zuul-like system
for most package testing.



--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


--
Stephen J Smoogen.