On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:53:22 +0100 Till Maas opensource@till.name wrote:
On Do Dezember 6 2007, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
The current updates system is getting better each release, but I think we should adjust our policies to also have an “updates-archive” repository. This repository will include all signed updates that had once lived in the updates repo, for the duration of the releases life-cycle. I don't expect all mirrors would want to carry this extra
Once the repositories are presto enabled, an updates-archive with all the delta rpms would not take as much space as a full rpm repository but provide the same functionality.
Yes, this is correct. I left it out of the letter due to the need for a specific client to deal with the presto data. PyJigdo could do such a task, if this is the route we want to go.