Em 19-05-2010 16:00, Dennis Gilmore escreveu:
On Wednesday 19 May 2010 08:59:20 am Mike McGrath wrote:
  
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Rui Gouveia wrote:
    
Hi all,

I've read all the messages in this list concerning the topic "Fedora
Project em Português". I want to thank all the good suggestions made by
everyone, specially those made by Paul W. Frields and Rodrigo Padula.

I want to clarify that I'm a co-coordinator of the Tranlation Portuguese
Team. Not the leader :).

I just want to add that we do have a small team for now. So, our
strategy was to concentrate our efforts on the materials used by the
non-tec everyday user in his everyday tasks. This excludes, for now,
many sysadmin and translator stuff. We were forgetting the wiki pages.
My fault.

Just recently have we finished the main website [1], but our translation
does not appear to us. We receive pt_BR no matter how we configure our
browser. That's a strange behavior and I already file a bug report [2]
[3].

I have checked all the "*pt*" pages in the wiki, and there's a lot os
stuff in "Pt_BR" (congrats guys) and not so much in "Pt": one important,
one to review and one to delete.

Taking in consideration that Transifex and the websites already use the
"pt" form, if nobody objects, I choose this format, as suggested by
Rodrigo.

I will add "[[Category:pt]]" to all the pages reviewed and created.

Is this acceptable?
      
it's fine with us on Infrastructure, that might be more of a
fedora-websites question though.  I've created categories in the past
without asking anyone so I think its probably fine.

	-Mike
    
the only comment id make is that it should be pt_PT to follow the normal 
convention used in all other areas

same as en_AU en_US en_GB  etc
and es_ES es_AR es_MX etc
  

Ok. pt_PT it is.

Thanks to all

Dennis
  
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure