On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:11:00 -0400Right. I think this is definitely where we are headed, but we aren't
seth vidal <email@example.com> wrote:
> Well I think the idea is simple enough - if there is one, branded and
> obvious login page - and that page is openid then we're not training
> our users to type their passwords into random websites.
there yet. ;(
So, yes, I think we need to add support to fedocal and blockerbugs for
openid, but not sure it's a blocker for them moving to production now.
Moving forward, we might consider making it a blocker, especially once
we have other things moved over to openid already, but I don't want to
change the goal posts for existing apps in the middle of the process.