On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 09:50:16AM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 03:11:17PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> So, what I would like to ask is:
> * what do you think of the project? Worth pursuing or not?
Even if it is only used by Fedora it is good to get away from the wiki
page. I always planned to add some more features that require a more
information per package, e.g. getting automatic changelog details for
I guess you're thinking of upstream's changelog from an eventual `CHANGELOG`
file in the upstream sources?
I've been thinking of cnucnu as the back-end library while cnucnu-web is just
the interface, so if you like to add more feature, I'm all for it :)
> So if we agree to get it up and running, I foresee few steps:
> * Check with legal if there are any limitations (ie: can we put non-FOSS projects
> in there?)
It is not only non-FOSS software but also about software with patents
that might be problematic.
I have asked spot about this.