[release] fedora-packages: 3.0.1

[Ralph Bean]

Hey all, after the deployment of 3.0.0 on Thursday[1], I have a followup
release here with some minor bugfixes and enhancements.

[1] - http://threebean.org/blog/history-of-fedora-packages/

3.0.1
-----

Pull Requests

- (@ralphbean)      #204, Log a warning, but don't email us.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pull/204
- (@ralphbean)      #199, Fix icon suffix.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pull/199
- (@ralphbean)      #201, Remove broken/unused rhbz stuff.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pull/201
- (@ralphbean)      #202, Fix .spec pygments lexer.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pull/202
- (@ralphbean)      #203, Fix git scraping.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pull/203
- (@ralphbean)      #207, Remove rhel5 links.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pull/207
- (@ralphbean)      #208, Change text from Owner to Point of Contact.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pull/208
- (@ralphbean)      #200, Fix up links to bodhi and koji.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pull/200

Commits

- 600480058 Raise a keyerror just to make this simpler.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/600480058
- 0c5ab0a58 Move xapian document preparation out of the threadpool.  The bindings
aren't threadsafe on el6.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/0c5ab0a58
- a891c2938 Also, log, so we know where we are on the fan-in thread.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/a891c2938
- 7202059f4 Fix icon suffix.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/7202059f4
- 1dfb63dbb Add build links on the Active Releases page.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/1dfb63dbb
- 777f0ea55 Make koji builds a link to koji.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/777f0ea55
- 1651a67a4 Remove broken/unused rhbz stuff.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/1651a67a4
- e4e6cb79e Fix .spec pygments lexer.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/e4e6cb79e
- 6d9dd0da7 Fix git scraping.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/6d9dd0da7
- 84ddb19a4 Log a warning, but don't email us.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/84ddb19a4
- dcdeaaf90 Remove rhel5 links.  Fixes #205.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/dcdeaaf90
- 954b76de3 Change text from Owner to Point of Contact.
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/954b76de3

[Vít Ondruch]

Sorry, but I'm not really sure it works as expected looking at:

https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ruby

it says "ruby - subpackage of rubygems" which is definitely not true.


Vít




Dne 23.11.2015 v 15:45 Ralph Bean napsal(a):
>  Hey all, after the deployment of 3.0.0 on Thursday[1], I have a
> followup
>  release here with some minor bugfixes and enhancements.
>
>  [1] - http://threebean.org/blog/history-of-fedora-packages/
>
>  3.0.1
>  -----
>
>  Pull Requests
>
>  - (@ralphbean)      #204, Log a warning, but don't email us.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pull/204
>  - (@ralphbean)      #199, Fix icon suffix.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pull/199
>  - (@ralphbean)      #201, Remove broken/unused rhbz stuff.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pull/201
>  - (@ralphbean)      #202, Fix .spec pygments lexer.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pull/202
>  - (@ralphbean)      #203, Fix git scraping.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pull/203
>  - (@ralphbean)      #207, Remove rhel5 links.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pull/207
>  - (@ralphbean)      #208, Change text from Owner to Point of Contact.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pull/208
>  - (@ralphbean)      #200, Fix up links to bodhi and koji.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pull/200
>
>  Commits
>
>  - 600480058 Raise a keyerror just to make this simpler.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/600480058
>  - 0c5ab0a58 Move xapian document preparation out of the threadpool.  The bindings
> aren't threadsafe on el6.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/0c5ab0a58
>  - a891c2938 Also, log, so we know where we are on the fan-in thread.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/a891c2938
>  - 7202059f4 Fix icon suffix.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/7202059f4
>  - 1dfb63dbb Add build links on the Active Releases page.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/1dfb63dbb
>  - 777f0ea55 Make koji builds a link to koji.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/777f0ea55
>  - 1651a67a4 Remove broken/unused rhbz stuff.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/1651a67a4
>  - e4e6cb79e Fix .spec pygments lexer.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/e4e6cb79e
>  - 6d9dd0da7 Fix git scraping.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/6d9dd0da7
>  - 84ddb19a4 Log a warning, but don't email us.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/84ddb19a4
>  - dcdeaaf90 Remove rhel5 links.  Fixes #205.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/dcdeaaf90
>  - 954b76de3 Change text from Owner to Point of Contact.
>    https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/commit/954b76de3
>  _______________________________________________
>  infrastructure mailing list
>  infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]...

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 04:20:32PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>  Sorry, but I'm not really sure it works as expected looking at:
>  
>  https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ruby
>  
>  it says "ruby - subpackage of rubygems" which is definitely not true. 
So the data in mdapi seems correct:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/mdapi/rawhide/pkg/rubygems?pretty=True
the basename is ruby, and rubygem is a sub-package of it.

Could we have some logic wrong there?

Note: the version 3.0.1 isn't in prod yet, Ralph is waiting for fedmsg to
process its backlog before pushing the udpate


Pierre

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 23.11.2015 v 16:55 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
>  On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 04:20:32PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Sorry, but I'm not really sure it works as expected looking at:
> >
> > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ruby
> >
> > it says "ruby - subpackage of rubygems" which is definitely not true.
>  So the data in mdapi seems correct:
>  https://apps.fedoraproject.org/mdapi/rawhide/pkg/rubygems?pretty=True
>  the basename is ruby, and rubygem is a sub-package of it. 
Well, it is probably a bit more complex, considering this:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=682005
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=674190

I.e. there is rubygems-2.4.5-44.fc24.noarch.rpm subpackage of ruby
package and at the same time rubygems-2.4.8-100.fc24.noarch.rpm, which
is standalone rubygems package. So if the mdapi is supposed to return
information about the latest package, the it should return information
about the rubygems-2.4.8-100.fc24.noarch.rpm, since it has higher NVR.

But that is probably different issue then the aforementioned one ;)


Vít

[Ralph Bean]

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 05:14:07PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>  Dne 23.11.2015 v 16:55 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
>  > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 04:20:32PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>  >> Sorry, but I'm not really sure it works as expected looking at:
>  >>
>  >> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ruby
>  >>
>  >> it says "ruby - subpackage of rubygems" which is definitely not true.
>  > So the data in mdapi seems correct:
>  > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/mdapi/rawhide/pkg/rubygems?pretty=True
>  > the basename is ruby, and rubygem is a sub-package of it.
>  
>  Well, it is probably a bit more complex, considering this:
>  
>  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=682005
>  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=674190
>  
>  I.e. there is rubygems-2.4.5-44.fc24.noarch.rpm subpackage of ruby
>  package and at the same time rubygems-2.4.8-100.fc24.noarch.rpm, which
>  is standalone rubygems package. So if the mdapi is supposed to return
>  information about the latest package, the it should return information
>  about the rubygems-2.4.8-100.fc24.noarch.rpm, since it has higher NVR.
>  
>  But that is probably different issue then the aforementioned one ;) 
Thanks Vít.  This looks tricky.  Can you file an issue about this at
https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages ?