Hi,
I'd like to enable aarch64 for EPEL-7, I was going to wait until post F-25 GA but given we've slipped I'd like to get approval for FBR.
The change in mash configs for bodhi is as below.
Peter
diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/epel7-testing.mash b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/epel7-testing.mash index 24d5b48..dd29d3e 100644 --- a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/epel7-testing.mash +++ b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/epel7-testing.mash @@ -13,6 +13,6 @@ keys = 352C64E5 use_repoview = False repoviewurl = http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/testing/7/%(arch)s/ repoviewtitle = "Fedora EPEL Testing 7 - %(arch)s" -arches = x86_64 ppc64 ppc64le +arches = x86_64 ppc64 ppc64le aarch64 hash_packages = True delta = False diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/epel7.mash b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/epel7.mash index 19f53b4..391ae45 100644 --- a/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/epel7.mash +++ b/roles/bodhi2/backend/files/epel7.mash @@ -13,6 +13,6 @@ keys = 352C64E5 use_repoview = False repoviewurl = http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/%(arch)s/ repoviewtitle = "Fedora EPEL 7 - %(arch)s" -arches = x86_64 ppc64 ppc64le +arches = x86_64 ppc64 ppc64le aarch64 hash_packages = True delta = False
Looks sane to me and easy to back out. +1
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
With everything else being ready, +1
kevin
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
+0 I would like to wait until CentOS-7 is out.
On 14 November 2016 at 16:00, Patrick Uiterwijk puiterwijk@redhat.com wrote:
Looks sane to me and easy to back out. +1
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
With everything else being ready, +1
kevin
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:36 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smooge@gmail.com wrote:
+0 I would like to wait until CentOS-7 is out.
What do you mean by this?
CentOS-7 for aarch64? It's already out. Or do you mean 7.3 for aarch64? I've been liaising with Jim Perrin on this from the aarch64 perspective and he wants it out sooner rather than later this is compatible with what is currently out there. Basically this has no negative impact on Centos for aarch64.
Peter
On 14 November 2016 at 16:00, Patrick Uiterwijk puiterwijk@redhat.com wrote:
Looks sane to me and easy to back out. +1
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
With everything else being ready, +1
kevin
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
If I might, I'd very much like to see this move sooner rather than later. x86_64 builds don't wait, I'm not sure why this one should.
That is the data point I wanted.
On 14 November 2016 at 16:58, jperrin@centos.org wrote:
If I might, I'd very much like to see this move sooner rather than later. x86_64 builds don't wait, I'm not sure why this one should. _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smooge@gmail.com wrote:
That is the data point I wanted.
What, you didn't think I was actively engaged with Jim right through this entire process?
So is that now a +1?
On 14 November 2016 at 16:58, jperrin@centos.org wrote:
If I might, I'd very much like to see this move sooner rather than later. x86_64 builds don't wait, I'm not sure why this one should. _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 14 November 2016 at 17:05, Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smooge@gmail.com wrote:
That is the data point I wanted.
What, you didn't think I was actively engaged with Jim right through this entire process?
I am not supposed to assume anything. When I do assume something it seems to lead to ruin. Whether I can communicate that clearly seems not to be possible today.
So is that now a +1?
It is a +1. It was a +0 before which meant not to hold it up but reservations.
On 14 November 2016 at 16:58, jperrin@centos.org wrote:
If I might, I'd very much like to see this move sooner rather than later. x86_64 builds don't wait, I'm not sure why this one should. _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org