Projects under github.com/fedora-infra

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

Good Morning Everyone,

I've been looking at all the projects we have under the fedora-infra org on
github.com.

We have 134 projects there:
- 45 of them are archived
- 1 is a mirror
    - people2
- 4 are forks: https://github.com/fedora-infra?type=fork
    - ssh-gpg-smartcard-config
      - Last commit on November 2020
      - Seems up to date with its parent project
    - pyramid_fas_openid
       - master branch
         - last commits October 2020 (previous ones 2017)
         - 40 commits ahead of master in its parent project
       - develop branch
         - last commits 2015
         - 26 commits ahead of master in its parent project
    - badgr-server
      - last commit March 2020
      - 415 commits behind its parent project
    - fedora-college
      - Last commit August 2014
      - 22 commits behind its parent project
  Questions:
    Are they being used/developed?
    Do we need them?
      If not, can we simply delete them?

- 85 are "source" repo.

Of these I would like to propose that we archive the following 24:
- tbs
- fpdc
- fedora-packages
- fedora-search
- stickynotes2modernpaste
- people2
- pkgwat.api
- pkgwat.cli
- noggin-old
- cpsreport
- taiga-contrib-oidc-auth
- zanata2fedmsg
- rdbsync
- fedmsg-notify
- fedmsg-health
- pkgdb2
- fedmsg-genacls
- fedora-stats-tools
- fedmsg-java
- pagure-hook-receiver
- JSAutoLogin
- fedmsg-wp
- askbot-fedmsg
- busmon

Then we have a these four that we run but do not maintain and that may want to
find a better place:
- asknot-ng
- fedbages
- tahrir
- tahrir-api

This would reduce the number of projects down to 57 projects most of which are
run and maintained by Fedora Infrastructure.


Then, I am also wondering if we should move the archived projects to another
organisation just to keep the list of projects somewhat manageable.


What do you think?


Thanks,
Pierre

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 05:09:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>  Good Morning Everyone,
>  
>  I've been looking at all the projects we have under the fedora-infra org on
>  github.com.
>  
>  We have 134 projects there:
>  - 45 of them are archived
>  - 1 is a mirror
>      - people2
>  - 4 are forks: https://github.com/fedora-infra?type=fork
>      - ssh-gpg-smartcard-config
>        - Last commit on November 2020
>        - Seems up to date with its parent project 
I think someone forked this to add some yubikey info?
But in any case I don't think we need it now.

>      - pyramid_fas_openid
>         - master branch
>           - last commits October 2020 (previous ones 2017)
>           - 40 commits ahead of master in its parent project
>         - develop branch
>           - last commits 2015
>           - 26 commits ahead of master in its parent project 
Alas, we still use this for bodhi I am pretty sure. 
At least bodhi-backend01 has: 
python3-pyramid-fas-openid-0.4.0-1.fc32.noarch
installed.

>      - badgr-server
>        - last commit March 2020
>        - 415 commits behind its parent project
>      - fedora-college
>        - Last commit August 2014
>        - 22 commits behind its parent project 
No idea on those two.

>    Questions:
>      Are they being used/developed?
>      Do we need them?
>        If not, can we simply delete them?
>  
>  - 85 are "source" repo.
>  
>  Of these I would like to propose that we archive the following 24:
>  - tbs
>  - fpdc
>  - fedora-packages
>  - fedora-search
>  - stickynotes2modernpaste
>  - people2
>  - pkgwat.api
>  - pkgwat.cli
>  - noggin-old
>  - cpsreport
>  - taiga-contrib-oidc-auth
>  - zanata2fedmsg
>  - rdbsync
>  - fedmsg-notify
>  - fedmsg-health
>  - pkgdb2
>  - fedmsg-genacls
>  - fedora-stats-tools
>  - fedmsg-java
>  - pagure-hook-receiver
>  - JSAutoLogin
>  - fedmsg-wp
>  - askbot-fedmsg
>  - busmon 
+1

>  Then we have a these four that we run but do not maintain and that
> may want to
>  find a better place:
>  - asknot-ng
>  - fedbages
>  - tahrir
>  - tahrir-api 
Yep. Lets see is OSPO wants them somewhere...

>  This would reduce the number of projects down to 57 projects most of
> which are
>  run and maintained by Fedora Infrastructure. 
Still a lot. ;) 
>  
>  Then, I am also wondering if we should move the archived projects to another
>  organisation just to keep the list of projects somewhat manageable. 
We could. Github does filter the archived ones out some, so I don't know
if it's worth the trouble, but if you think it's worth it we can. 

kevin

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:17:35PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>  On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 05:09:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>  > We have 134 projects there:
>  > - 45 of them are archived
>  > - 1 is a mirror
>  >     - people2
>  > - 4 are forks: https://github.com/fedora-infra?type=fork
>  >     - ssh-gpg-smartcard-config
>  >       - Last commit on November 2020
>  >       - Seems up to date with its parent project
>  
>  I think someone forked this to add some yubikey info?
>  But in any case I don't think we need it now.
>  
>  >     - pyramid_fas_openid
>  >        - master branch
>  >          - last commits October 2020 (previous ones 2017)
>  >          - 40 commits ahead of master in its parent project
>  >        - develop branch
>  >          - last commits 2015
>  >          - 26 commits ahead of master in its parent project
>  
>  Alas, we still use this for bodhi I am pretty sure. 
>  At least bodhi-backend01 has: 
>  python3-pyramid-fas-openid-0.4.0-1.fc32.noarch
>  installed. 
Do we know if the package's sources come from our fork?

>  > Then we have a these four that we run but do not maintain and
> that may want to
>  > find a better place:
>  > - asknot-ng
>  > - fedbages
>  > - tahrir
>  > - tahrir-api
>  
>  Yep. Lets see is OSPO wants them somewhere...
>  
>  > This would reduce the number of projects down to 57 projects most of which are
>  > run and maintained by Fedora Infrastructure.
>  
>  Still a lot. ;)  
yup, though the split of the message schemas to different repo kind of
"artificially" increases that number (ie: maintaining 1 code-base, results in
two projects on github). Let's see how are things once we've cleaned them up a
little more :)

>  > Then, I am also wondering if we should move the archived
> projects to another
>  > organisation just to keep the list of projects somewhat manageable.
>  
>  We could. Github does filter the archived ones out some, so I don't know
>  if it's worth the trouble, but if you think it's worth it we can.  
Agreed, however archived projects are shown by default, if we find a way to hide
archived project by default I think that would be sufficient.
Basically, I'm looking for a way that it shows 57 or so projects by default
rather than 134.

Hoping it makes sense :)


Pierre

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 09:29:04AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>  On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:17:35PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>  > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 05:09:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>  > > We have 134 projects there:
>  > > - 45 of them are archived
>  > > - 1 is a mirror
>  > >     - people2
>  > > - 4 are forks: https://github.com/fedora-infra?type=fork
>  > >     - ssh-gpg-smartcard-config
>  > >       - Last commit on November 2020
>  > >       - Seems up to date with its parent project
>  > 
>  > I think someone forked this to add some yubikey info?
>  > But in any case I don't think we need it now.
>  > 
>  > >     - pyramid_fas_openid
>  > >        - master branch
>  > >          - last commits October 2020 (previous ones 2017)
>  > >          - 40 commits ahead of master in its parent project
>  > >        - develop branch
>  > >          - last commits 2015
>  > >          - 26 commits ahead of master in its parent project
>  > 
>  > Alas, we still use this for bodhi I am pretty sure. 
>  > At least bodhi-backend01 has: 
>  > python3-pyramid-fas-openid-0.4.0-1.fc32.noarch
>  > installed.
>  
>  Do we know if the package's sources come from our fork? 
dnf info shows our fork as URL so I guess that answers it :)


Pierre

[Nick Bebout]

I forked ssh-gpg-smartcard-config a while back before I got access to
herlo's repo so I could update it.  Now I have commit access to herlo's
repo, so it may be unnecessary to have our fork (although I don't see what
it hurts).  I would like to look and see if the fedora-infra repo is linked
to anywhere before we delete it.


On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:38 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou(a)pingoured.fr&gt;
wrote:

>  On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:17:35PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>  > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 05:09:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>  > > We have 134 projects there:
>  > > - 45 of them are archived
>  > > - 1 is a mirror
>  > >     - people2
>  > > - 4 are forks: https://github.com/fedora-infra?type=fork
>  > >     - ssh-gpg-smartcard-config
>  > >       - Last commit on November 2020
>  > >       - Seems up to date with its parent project
>  >
>  > I think someone forked this to add some yubikey info?
>  > But in any case I don't think we need it now.
>  >
>  > >     - pyramid_fas_openid
>  > >        - master branch
>  > >          - last commits October 2020 (previous ones 2017)
>  > >          - 40 commits ahead of master in its parent project
>  > >        - develop branch
>  > >          - last commits 2015
>  > >          - 26 commits ahead of master in its parent project
>  >
>  > Alas, we still use this for bodhi I am pretty sure.
>  > At least bodhi-backend01 has:
>  > python3-pyramid-fas-openid-0.4.0-1.fc32.noarch
>  > installed.
>
>  Do we know if the package's sources come from our fork?
>
>  > > Then we have a these four that we run but do not maintain and that may
>  want to
>  > > find a better place:
>  > > - asknot-ng
>  > > - fedbages
>  > > - tahrir
>  > > - tahrir-api
>  >
>  > Yep. Lets see is OSPO wants them somewhere...
>  >
>  > > This would reduce the number of projects down to 57 projects most of
>  which are
>  > > run and maintained by Fedora Infrastructure.
>  >
>  > Still a lot. ;)
>
>  yup, though the split of the message schemas to different repo kind of
>  "artificially" increases that number (ie: maintaining 1 code-base, results
>  in
>  two projects on github). Let's see how are things once we've cleaned them
>  up a
>  little more :)
>
>  > > Then, I am also wondering if we should move the archived projects to
>  another
>  > > organisation just to keep the list of projects somewhat manageable.
>  >
>  > We could. Github does filter the archived ones out some, so I don't know
>  > if it's worth the trouble, but if you think it's worth it we can.
>
>  Agreed, however archived projects are shown by default, if we find a way
>  to hide
>  archived project by default I think that would be sufficient.
>  Basically, I'm looking for a way that it shows 57 or so projects by default
>  rather than 134.
>
>  Hoping it makes sense :)
>
>
>  Pierre
>  _______________________________________________
>  infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to
>  infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  Fedora Code of Conduct:
>  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>  List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  List Archives:
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]...
>

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 08:26:02PM -0600, Nick Bebout wrote:
>  I forked ssh-gpg-smartcard-config a while back before I got access
> to
>  herlo's repo so I could update it.  Now I have commit access to herlo's
>  repo, so it may be unnecessary to have our fork (although I don't see what
>  it hurts).  I would like to look and see if the fedora-infra repo is linked
>  to anywhere before we delete it. 
Thanks, the goal is simply to have a better overview of what we currently
maintain.


Pierre

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:17:35PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>  On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 05:09:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>  > - 85 are "source" repo.
>  > 
>  > Of these I would like to propose that we archive the following 24:
>  > - tbs
>  > - fpdc
>  > - fedora-packages
>  > - fedora-search
>  > - stickynotes2modernpaste
>  > - people2
>  > - pkgwat.api
>  > - pkgwat.cli
>  > - noggin-old
>  > - cpsreport
>  > - taiga-contrib-oidc-auth
>  > - zanata2fedmsg
>  > - rdbsync
>  > - fedmsg-notify
>  > - fedmsg-health
>  > - pkgdb2
>  > - fedmsg-genacls
>  > - fedora-stats-tools
>  > - fedmsg-java
>  > - pagure-hook-receiver
>  > - JSAutoLogin
>  > - fedmsg-wp
>  > - askbot-fedmsg
>  > - busmon
>  
>  +1 
Considering the feedback, I'm going to go ahead and archive these projects.

Thanks everyone!

Pierre

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 01:40:05PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>  On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:17:35PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>  > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 05:09:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>  > > - 85 are "source" repo.
>  > > 
>  > > Of these I would like to propose that we archive the following 24:
>  > > - tbs
>  > > - fpdc
>  > > - fedora-packages
>  > > - fedora-search
>  > > - stickynotes2modernpaste
>  > > - people2
>  > > - pkgwat.api
>  > > - pkgwat.cli
>  > > - noggin-old
>  > > - cpsreport
>  > > - taiga-contrib-oidc-auth
>  > > - zanata2fedmsg
>  > > - rdbsync
>  > > - fedmsg-notify
>  > > - fedmsg-health
>  > > - pkgdb2
>  > > - fedmsg-genacls
>  > > - fedora-stats-tools
>  > > - fedmsg-java
>  > > - pagure-hook-receiver
>  > > - JSAutoLogin
>  > > - fedmsg-wp
>  > > - askbot-fedmsg
>  > > - busmon
>  > 
>  > +1
>  
>  Considering the feedback, I'm going to go ahead and archive these projects. 
Here are a few more that I've archived as well:

taiga-contrib-fas-openid-auth
jenkins-fedmsg-emit (not changed since 2017 and was used when we ran our own
  jenkins instance)
fpdc-client (since we archived pdc)
pdc-updater (merged into toddlers)


Pierre

[SmootherFrOgZ]

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021, 5:09 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou(a)pingoured.fr&gt; wrote:

>  Good Morning Everyone,
>
>  I've been looking at all the projects we have under the fedora-infra org on
>  github.com.
>
>  We have 134 projects there:
>  - 45 of them are archived
>  - 1 is a mirror
>      - people2
>  - 4 are forks: https://github.com/fedora-infra?type=fork
>      - ssh-gpg-smartcard-config
>        - Last commit on November 2020
>        - Seems up to date with its parent project
>      - pyramid_fas_openid
>         - master branch
>           - last commits October 2020 (previous ones 2017)
>           - 40 commits ahead of master in its parent project
>         - develop branch
>           - last commits 2015
>           - 26 commits ahead of master in its parent project
>      - badgr-server
>        - last commit March 2020
>        - 415 commits behind its parent project
>      - fedora-college
>        - Last commit August 2014
>        - 22 commits behind its parent project
>    Questions:
>      Are they being used/developed?
>      Do we need them?
>        If not, can we simply delete them?
>
>  - 85 are "source" repo.
>
>  Of these I would like to propose that we archive the following 24:
>  - tbs
>  - fpdc
>  - fedora-packages
>  - fedora-search
>  - stickynotes2modernpaste
>  - people2
>  - pkgwat.api
>  - pkgwat.cli
>  - noggin-old
>  - cpsreport
>  - taiga-contrib-oidc-auth
>  - zanata2fedmsg
>  - rdbsync
>  - fedmsg-notify
>  - fedmsg-health
>  - pkgdb2
>  - fedmsg-genacls
>  - fedora-stats-tools
>  - fedmsg-java
>  - pagure-hook-receiver
>  - JSAutoLogin
>  - fedmsg-wp
>  - askbot-fedmsg
>  - busmon
>
>  Then we have a these four that we run but do not maintain and that may
>  want to
>  find a better place:
>  - asknot-ng
>  - fedbages
>  - tahrir
>  - tahrir-api 

>  I believe we started a discussion about this last flock. We def need
> to
>  follow-up on the actual status and what left to do since then. 

>  This would reduce the number of projects down to 57 projects most of which
>  are
>  run and maintained by Fedora Infrastructure.
>
>
>  Then, I am also wondering if we should move the archived projects to
>  another
>  organisation just to keep the list of projects somewhat manageable.
>
>
>  What do you think?
>
>
>  Thanks,
>  Pierre
>  _______________________________________________
>  infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to
>  infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  Fedora Code of Conduct:
>  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>  List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  List Archives:
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]...
>