3:58 p.m.
Hello!
I've made a release of Bodhi 2.4.0 upstream:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases/tag/2.4.0
What guidance would this group give about deploying it tomorrow
(Thursday) vs. waiting until next Monday?
5:46 p.m.
On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 16:58 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
Hello!
I've made a release of Bodhi 2.4.0 upstream:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases/tag/2.4.0
What guidance would this group give about deploying it tomorrow
(Thursday) vs. waiting until next Monday?
New releases are traditionally deployed direct to production at 5:30pm
on Friday, just before you leave for a long vacation with no internet
access. Everyone knows this!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
5:53 p.m.
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:58:09 -0500
Randy Barlow <randy(a)electronsweatshop.com> wrote:
Hello!
I've made a release of Bodhi 2.4.0 upstream:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases/tag/2.4.0
What guidance would this group give about deploying it tomorrow
(Thursday) vs. waiting until next Monday?
Sooner seems better than later to me, but do coordinate with mboddu on
pushes. ;)
kevin
9:11 p.m.
On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 16:58 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
I've been unable to build Bodhi in Rawhide, due to a packaging bug with
python-dogpile-cache:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422716
That package can only be committed to by Ralph or the infra-sig. I'm
willing to fix it myself, but I'm not in the infra-sig. I applied for
membership in the infra-sig group if anyone would like to sponsor me. I
also applied for commit access on the package, which is lesser access
and is all I really need at this time, if someone wants to mark that
approved. If not, could one of you fix that bug for me?
8:22 a.m.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:11:14PM -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 16:58 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases/tag/2.4.0
I've been unable to build Bodhi in Rawhide, due to a packaging bug with
python-dogpile-cache:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422716
That package can only be committed to by Ralph or the infra-sig. I'm
willing to fix it myself, but I'm not in the infra-sig. I applied for
membership in the infra-sig group if anyone would like to sponsor me. I
also applied for commit access on the package, which is lesser access
and is all I really need at this time, if someone wants to mark that
approved. If not, could one of you fix that bug for me?
Rights granted to you on dogpile*!
9:20 a.m.
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:11:14 -0500
Randy Barlow <bowlofeggs(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 16:58 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/releases/tag/2.4.0
I've been unable to build Bodhi in Rawhide, due to a packaging bug
with python-dogpile-cache:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422716
That package can only be committed to by Ralph or the infra-sig. I'm
willing to fix it myself, but I'm not in the infra-sig. I applied for
membership in the infra-sig group if anyone would like to sponsor me.
I also applied for commit access on the package, which is lesser
access and is all I really need at this time, if someone wants to
mark that approved. If not, could one of you fix that bug for me?
I've added you to the infra-sig. ;) There's lots of fun bugs to fix.
kevin
2618
days inactive
2619
days old
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
6 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Adam Williamson -
Kevin Fenzi -
Ralph Bean -
Randy Barlow -
Randy Barlow