9:49 a.m.
From past few weeks, we have started producing Atomic composes
media during Fedora 28 bodhi updates and updates-testing run.
Media name of AH ISO are perfectly fine. But for cloud images
media name[1] looks something like
Fedora-AtomicHost-28_Update-20180620.1235.x86_64.qcow2 for qcow2.
It will be nice to have media name like
Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180620.0.x86_64.qcow2 which
is what we get during regular atomic twoweek compose run [2].
This patch (available in email attachment) attempts to fix the media name.
Taken inspiration from releng issue [3] and ansible commit [4]. I am not
sure how to test it locally, any pointers will be useful.
[1]
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/updates/Fedora-28-updates-2018...
[2]
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/Fedora-Atomic-28-20180...
[3] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7113
[4]
https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=40c3...
1:21 p.m.
New subject: [PATCH] bodhi update run: Attempt to get better Atomic images
media name during updates run
On 06/21/2018 10:49 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
From past few weeks, we have started producing Atomic composes
media during Fedora 28 bodhi updates and updates-testing run.
Media name of AH ISO are perfectly fine. But for cloud images
media name[1] looks something like
Fedora-AtomicHost-28_Update-20180620.1235.x86_64.qcow2 for qcow2.
It will be nice to have media name like
Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180620.0.x86_64.qcow2 which
is what we get during regular atomic twoweek compose run [2].
This patch (available in email attachment) attempts to fix the media name.
Taken inspiration from releng issue [3] and ansible commit [4]. I am not
sure how to test it locally, any pointers will be useful.
Thanks Sinny!
Since we are already only building images for >= 28 then I don't think we
need the if/endif statements in your patch.
I would say to try to work with randy/lsedlar to test this in stage but
since nothing is yet depending on these images I'm not opposed to just
merging this and seeing if it works in prod.
>
> [1]
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/updates/Fedora-28-updates-2018...
> [2]
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/Fedora-Atomic-28-20180...
> [3] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7113
> [4]
https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=40c3...
11:41 p.m.
New subject: [PATCH] bodhi update run: Attempt to get better Atomic images
media name during updates run
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Dusty Mabe <dusty(a)dustymabe.com> wrote:
On 06/21/2018 10:49 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
> From past few weeks, we have started producing Atomic composes
> media during Fedora 28 bodhi updates and updates-testing run.
> Media name of AH ISO are perfectly fine. But for cloud images
> media name[1] looks something like
> Fedora-AtomicHost-28_Update-20180620.1235.x86_64.qcow2 for qcow2.
> It will be nice to have media name like
> Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180620.0.x86_64.qcow2 which
> is what we get during regular atomic twoweek compose run [2].
>
> This patch (available in email attachment) attempts to fix the media
name.
> Taken inspiration from releng issue [3] and ansible commit [4]. I am not
> sure how to test it locally, any pointers will be useful.
Thanks Sinny!
Since we are already only building images for >= 28 then I don't think we
need the if/endif statements in your patch.
Yeah , we don't now but added it because we may need in future when F29
is released. I have updated patch (available in attachment) with removing
if condition.
I would say to try to work with randy/lsedlar to test this in stage
but
since nothing is yet depending on these images I'm not opposed to just
merging this and seeing if it works in prod.
Randy is on PTO currently, will check with lsedlar if he can test this patch
on stage.
>
> [1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/
updates/Fedora-28-updates-20180620.0/compose/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/
> [2] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/Fedora-Atomic-28-
20180620.0/compose/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/
> [3] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7113
> [4] https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/
ansible.git/commit/?id=40c32c97f2dcaab549dba7cbb5fbd1897bd57ed8
--
http://sinny.io/
9:31 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH] bodhi update run: Attempt to get better Atomic images
media name during updates run
Sorry for late response.
Last patch didn't work when we tested in koji for an image build.
We had to make some changes in pungi [1] to fix it and now fix
is available in pungi-4.1.26-2.
New patch (available in attachment) should work once bodhi-backend-01
is updated with latest pungi. [2]
[1]
https://pagure.io/pungi/c/1759c1ba80156a8ec466e4ad31802930ade4ba8e?branch...
[2] https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7154
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Sinny Kumari <ksinny(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Dusty Mabe <dusty(a)dustymabe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 06/21/2018 10:49 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
> > From past few weeks, we have started producing Atomic composes
> > media during Fedora 28 bodhi updates and updates-testing run.
> > Media name of AH ISO are perfectly fine. But for cloud images
> > media name[1] looks something like
> > Fedora-AtomicHost-28_Update-20180620.1235.x86_64.qcow2 for qcow2.
> > It will be nice to have media name like
> > Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180620.0.x86_64.qcow2 which
> > is what we get during regular atomic twoweek compose run [2].
> >
> > This patch (available in email attachment) attempts to fix the media
> name.
> > Taken inspiration from releng issue [3] and ansible commit [4]. I am not
> > sure how to test it locally, any pointers will be useful.
>
> Thanks Sinny!
>
> Since we are already only building images for >= 28 then I don't think we
> need the if/endif statements in your patch.
>
Yeah , we don't now but added it because we may need in future when F29
is released. I have updated patch (available in attachment) with removing
if condition.
> I would say to try to work with randy/lsedlar to test this in stage but
> since nothing is yet depending on these images I'm not opposed to just
> merging this and seeing if it works in prod.
>
Randy is on PTO currently, will check with lsedlar if he can test this
patch
on stage.
> >
> > [1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/updates/Fedora-
> 28-updates-20180620.0/compose/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/
> > [2] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/Fedora-
> Atomic-28-20180620.0/compose/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/
> > [3] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7113
> > [4] https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/
> commit/?id=40c32c97f2dcaab549dba7cbb5fbd1897bd57ed8
>
--
http://sinny.io/
--
http://sinny.io/
2:30 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH] bodhi update run: Attempt to get better Atomic images
media name during updates run
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 8:01 PM, Sinny Kumari <ksinny(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry for late response.
Last patch didn't work when we tested in koji for an image build.
We had to make some changes in pungi [1] to fix it and now fix
is available in pungi-4.1.26-2.
pungi-4.1.26-2 should be available now on bodhi-backend-01.
New patch (available in attachment) should work once bodhi-backend-01
is updated with latest pungi. [2]
[1] https://pagure.io/pungi/c/1759c1ba80156a8ec466e4ad318029
30ade4ba8e?branch=master
[2] https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7154
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Sinny Kumari <ksinny(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Dusty Mabe <dusty(a)dustymabe.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 06/21/2018 10:49 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
>> > From past few weeks, we have started producing Atomic composes
>> > media during Fedora 28 bodhi updates and updates-testing run.
>> > Media name of AH ISO are perfectly fine. But for cloud images
>> > media name[1] looks something like
>> > Fedora-AtomicHost-28_Update-20180620.1235.x86_64.qcow2 for qcow2.
>> > It will be nice to have media name like
>> > Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180620.0.x86_64.qcow2 which
>> > is what we get during regular atomic twoweek compose run [2].
>> >
>> > This patch (available in email attachment) attempts to fix the media
>> name.
>> > Taken inspiration from releng issue [3] and ansible commit [4]. I am
>> not
>> > sure how to test it locally, any pointers will be useful.
>>
>> Thanks Sinny!
>>
>> Since we are already only building images for >= 28 then I don't think we
>> need the if/endif statements in your patch.
>>
>
> Yeah , we don't now but added it because we may need in future when F29
> is released. I have updated patch (available in attachment) with removing
> if condition.
>
>
>> I would say to try to work with randy/lsedlar to test this in stage but
>> since nothing is yet depending on these images I'm not opposed to just
>> merging this and seeing if it works in prod.
>>
>
> Randy is on PTO currently, will check with lsedlar if he can test this
> patch
> on stage.
>
>
>> >
>> > [1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/updates/Fedora-28
>> -updates-20180620.0/compose/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/
>> > [2] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/Fedora-At
>> omic-28-20180620.0/compose/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/
>> > [3] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7113
>> > [4] https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/co
>> mmit/?id=40c32c97f2dcaab549dba7cbb5fbd1897bd57ed8
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://sinny.io/
>
--
http://sinny.io/
--
http://sinny.io/
9:35 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH] bodhi update run: Attempt to get better Atomic images
media name during updates run
Sorry, previous patch had a minor issue. Please use the patch
from here (available in attachment).
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Sinny Kumari <ksinny(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 8:01 PM, Sinny Kumari <ksinny(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry for late response.
>
> Last patch didn't work when we tested in koji for an image build.
> We had to make some changes in pungi [1] to fix it and now fix
> is available in pungi-4.1.26-2.
>
>
pungi-4.1.26-2 should be available now on bodhi-backend-01.
New patch (available in attachment) should work once bodhi-backend-01
> is updated with latest pungi. [2]
>
> [1] https://pagure.io/pungi/c/1759c1ba80156a8ec466e4ad31802930ad
> e4ba8e?branch=master
> [2] https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7154
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Sinny Kumari <ksinny(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Dusty Mabe <dusty(a)dustymabe.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/21/2018 10:49 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
>>> > From past few weeks, we have started producing Atomic composes
>>> > media during Fedora 28 bodhi updates and updates-testing run.
>>> > Media name of AH ISO are perfectly fine. But for cloud images
>>> > media name[1] looks something like
>>> > Fedora-AtomicHost-28_Update-20180620.1235.x86_64.qcow2 for qcow2.
>>> > It will be nice to have media name like
>>> > Fedora-AtomicHost-28-20180620.0.x86_64.qcow2 which
>>> > is what we get during regular atomic twoweek compose run [2].
>>> >
>>> > This patch (available in email attachment) attempts to fix the media
>>> name.
>>> > Taken inspiration from releng issue [3] and ansible commit [4]. I am
>>> not
>>> > sure how to test it locally, any pointers will be useful.
>>>
>>> Thanks Sinny!
>>>
>>> Since we are already only building images for >= 28 then I don't
think
>>> we
>>> need the if/endif statements in your patch.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah , we don't now but added it because we may need in future when F29
>> is released. I have updated patch (available in attachment) with
>> removing if condition.
>>
>>
>>> I would say to try to work with randy/lsedlar to test this in stage but
>>> since nothing is yet depending on these images I'm not opposed to just
>>> merging this and seeing if it works in prod.
>>>
>>
>> Randy is on PTO currently, will check with lsedlar if he can test this
>> patch
>> on stage.
>>
>>
>>> >
>>> > [1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/updates/Fedora-28
>>> -updates-20180620.0/compose/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/
>>> > [2] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/Fedora-At
>>> omic-28-20180620.0/compose/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/
>>> > [3] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7113
>>> > [4] https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/co
>>> mmit/?id=40c32c97f2dcaab549dba7cbb5fbd1897bd57ed8
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://sinny.io/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://sinny.io/
>
--
http://sinny.io/
--
http://sinny.io/
10:09 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH] bodhi update run: Attempt to get better Atomic images
media name during updates run
On 08/10/2018 10:35 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
Sorry, previous patch had a minor issue. Please use the patch
from here (available in attachment).
LGTM. Thanks Sinny. I'll let someone from releng/infra +1 before I push.
Dusty
4:59 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH] bodhi update run: Attempt to get better Atomic images
media name during updates run
Looks ok to me. +1
kevin
7:15 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH] bodhi update run: Attempt to get better Atomic images
media name during updates run
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 2:58 AM, Dusty Mabe <dusty(a)dustymabe.com> wrote:
On 08/12/2018 05:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Looks ok to me. +1
> kevin
>
Applied and playbook ran!
Thanks!
Dusty
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.
fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/
infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org/message/
Z2HDJHCKI7IWHR3KCLDYOMZF2SY4XFOT/
--
http://sinny.io/
2079
days inactive
2133
days old
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
9 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Dusty Mabe -
Kevin Fenzi -
Sinny Kumari