Wiki Upgrade

[Mike McGrath]

We have a proof of concept up and running for the wiki upgrade at:

http://webtest.fedora.redhat.com/wiki

We've got a little bit of work to do in testing, the two sites do look
different.

We need the web guys (and maybe the doc guys?) to look at the website
and see what needs to be done and report whats broken.  This is
something we'd like to get out by the end of February so it will be
ready for the Fedora 7 release.

Patrick: Who from the website team would be a good point person to
coordinate the upgrade with?

-Mike

[Dimitris Glezos]

O/H Mike McGrath έγραψε:
> We have a proof of concept up and running for the wiki upgrade at:
>
> http://webtest.fedora.redhat.com/wiki
>
> We've got a little bit of work to do in testing, the two sites do look
> different.

On the new wiki we have applied some wiki/foo to enhance the usability of the
website. For more info, refer to:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DimitrisGlezos/WikiDesignTuning

There is still some work to be done to "get it right". The page where the
migration is coordinated is:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WikiMigration
> We need the web guys (and maybe the doc guys?) to look at the website
> and see what needs to be done and report whats broken.  This is
> something we'd like to get out by the end of February so it will be
> ready for the Fedora 7 release.

I think end of February is a feasible target; although Paulo Santos (who handles
the migration and has access to make changes) is the man to answer this. :)

-d
> Patrick: Who from the website team would be a good point person to
> coordinate the upgrade with?
>      -Mike
>
> Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

[Rahul Sundaram]

Dimitris Glezos wrote:
> O/H Mike McGrath έγραψε:
> > We have a proof of concept up and running for the wiki upgrade at:
> >
> > http://webtest.fedora.redhat.com/wiki
> >
> > We've got a little bit of work to do in testing, the two sites do look
> > different.
>
> On the new wiki we have applied some wiki/foo to enhance the usability of the
> website. For more info, refer to:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DimitrisGlezos/WikiDesignTuning

The icon to make external links stand out sticks out sorely. We probably 
could use another icon or something else to differentiate.

Rahul

[Thomas Chung]

On 1/22/07, Rahul Sundaram  wrote:
> Dimitris Glezos wrote:
> > O/H Mike McGrath έγραψε:
> > > We have a proof of concept up and running for the wiki upgrade at:
> > >
> > > http://webtest.fedora.redhat.com/wiki
> > >
> > > We've got a little bit of work to do in testing, the two sites do look
> > > different.
> >
> > On the new wiki we have applied some wiki/foo to enhance the usability of the
> > website. For more info, refer to:
> >
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DimitrisGlezos/WikiDesignTuning
>
> The icon to make external links stand out sticks out sorely. We probably
> could use another icon or something else to differentiate.

Also, I still do not see "Attachments" option under "more actions"
drop down menu:
http://webtest.fedora.redhat.com/wiki

It's odd that status shows "Done" at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WikiMigration

Regards,

[Paulo Santos]

Hi Thomas,

The attachment link isnt in the drop down menu anymore. It is something that
needs to be modified manually on the theme template.
This was "done" indeed. But as you can probably see, the testing wiki got
updated, so my changes were also overwriten. But this is not a big deal,
since the link is just a line that needs to be added to the template, since
the actual feature is working.

Test with http://webtest.fedora.redhat.com/AnyPageYouWant?action=AttachFile
Im currently without internet at home, so as soon as i have it back, i'll
insert the line again.

Also regarding the actual wiki upgrade, i say that we should upgrade it when
everyone feels confortable with the new engine, and happy with the design.
So, in my opinion is not me that should say when we migrate, it should be a
wide decision by everyone involved.

Thanks,
Paulo

On 1/23/07, Thomas Chung  wrote:
> On 1/22/07, Rahul Sundaram  wrote:
> > Dimitris Glezos wrote:
> > > O/H Mike McGrath έγραψε:
> > > > We have a proof of concept up and running for the wiki upgrade at:
> > > >
> > > > http://webtest.fedora.redhat.com/wiki
> > > >
> > > > We've got a little bit of work to do in testing, the two sites do
>
> look
> > > > different.
> > >
> > > On the new wiki we have applied some wiki/foo to enhance the usability
>
> of the
> > > website. For more info, refer to:
> > >
> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DimitrisGlezos/WikiDesignTuning
> >
> > The icon to make external links stand out sticks out sorely. We probably
> > could use another icon or something else to differentiate.
>
> Also, I still do not see "Attachments" option under "more actions"
> drop down menu:
> http://webtest.fedora.redhat.com/wiki
>
> It's odd that status shows "Done" at:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WikiMigration
> Regards,
>
> Thomas Chung
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasChung
>
> --
> Fedora-websites-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

[Ahmed Kamal]

Hi,
I have updated the missing link for attachements. Let me know if I can help,
till Paulo is back online.
PS: I notice the bottom toolbar has the "python" link covered by the side
bar on short pages like
http://webtest.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/AhmedKamal

On 1/23/07, Paulo Santos  wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> The attachment link isnt in the drop down menu anymore. It is something
> that needs to be modified manually on the theme template.
> This was "done" indeed. But as you can probably see, the testing wiki got
> updated, so my changes were also overwriten. But this is not a big deal,
> since the link is just a line that needs to be added to the template, since
> the actual feature is working.
>
> Test with
> http://webtest.fedora.redhat.com/AnyPageYouWant?action=AttachFile
> Im currently without internet at home, so as soon as i have it back, i'll
> insert the line again.
>
> Also regarding the actual wiki upgrade, i say that we should upgrade it
> when everyone feels confortable with the new engine, and happy with the
> design. So, in my opinion is not me that should say when we migrate, it
> should be a wide decision by everyone involved.
>
> Thanks,
> Paulo
>
> On 1/23/07, Thomas Chung  wrote:
> > On 1/22/07, Rahul Sundaram  wrote:
> > > Dimitris Glezos wrote:
> > > > O/H Mike McGrath έγραψε:
> > > > > We have a proof of concept up and running for the wiki upgrade at:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://webtest.fedora.redhat.com/wiki
> > > > >
> > > > > We've got a little bit of work to do in testing, the two sites do
> >
> > look
> > > > > different.
> > > >
> > > > On the new wiki we have applied some wiki/foo to enhance the
> >
> > usability of the
> > > > website. For more info, refer to:
> > > >
> > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DimitrisGlezos/WikiDesignTuning
> > >
> > > The icon to make external links stand out sticks out sorely. We
> >
> > probably
> > > could use another icon or something else to differentiate.
> >
> > Also, I still do not see "Attachments" option under "more actions"
> > drop down menu:
> > http://webtest.fedora.redhat.com/wiki
> >
> > It's odd that status shows "Done" at:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WikiMigration
> > Regards,
> >
> > Thomas Chung
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasChung
> >
> > --
> > Fedora-websites-list mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
>
> Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

[Mike McGrath]

On 1/23/07, Paulo Santos  wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> The attachment link isnt in the drop down menu anymore. It is something that
> needs to be modified manually on the theme template.
> This was "done" indeed. But as you can probably see, the testing wiki got
> updated, so my changes were also overwriten. But this is not a big deal,
> since the link is just a line that needs to be added to the template, since
> the actual feature is working.

Is there any easy way to prevent this from happening?  I mean, we can
test the test wiki all we want but will we have to re-do all the
changes again when we do the permanent migration?  Is there an easy
way to avoid duplication of work?

-Mike

[Paulo Santos]

> Is there any easy way to prevent this from happening?  I mean, we can
> test the test wiki all we want but will we have to re-do all the
> changes again when we do the permanent migration?  Is there an easy
> way to avoid duplication of work?
>      -Mike
>
> --
> Fedora-websites-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

Yes, we just need to restore the folowing directories inside data:
- user (user logins, preferences, etc)
- pages (actual wiki pages)
and the following files also inside data:
- edit-log (for the recent changes page)
- view-log (some history about viewed pages, etc - not sure if we want to
keep this)

So lets plan the following, do a backup for the described folders and files
next week (so that we can idenfify wiki changes), and drop them in webtest.
The actual data should be updated, without loosing any modification to the
actual engine/plugins/theme.

What you guys think ?

Paulo