A small step towards for solving Ticket 1084

[vipin kumar]

Hi Team!

This mail is regarding Ticket
1084<https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1084>

As I already informed in Infrastructure weekly meeting that I'm proposing a
slight change in
page<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Architecture>layout
as mentioned below -

1 Global Presence
         < this section is about either showing fedora servers in
geographical map or just listing server locations as suggested by
'abadger1999'.>
2 Network Topology
         < this section shows how our severs are interconnected or
connected to the outside world. I guess this section will make more sense
if we are just listing the server locations in section 1.>

3 Network Architecture
         < this section will show overall network architecture with
protocol stacks >
    3.1 Front end
         < similar to present section but with more detail >
    3.2 Proxy view
         < similar to present section but with more detail >
    3.3 Application layer
         < similar to present section but with more detail >
4 Helping Out (or Help Us ?)
         < this section will target two type of contributors, one who can
improve the quality of information present in page
<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Architecture>and another who
can provide resources.>

This is the overall structure and type of content the page will have.
Please let me know about any additions, deletions or Improvements.


Thanks & Regards,

-- 
Vipin K.
IRC ID: _love_hurts_

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:47:33 +0530
vipin kumar <vipinkumar41(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

>  Hi Team!
>  
>  This mail is regarding Ticket
>  1084<https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1084>
>  
>  As I already informed in Infrastructure weekly meeting that I'm
>  proposing a slight change in
>  page<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Architecture>layout
>  as mentioned below -
>  
>  1 Global Presence
>           < this section is about either showing fedora servers in
>  geographical map or just listing server locations as suggested by
>  'abadger1999'.> 
I think just a table here with a region listed would be good. 

>  2 Network Topology
>           < this section shows how our severs are interconnected or
>  connected to the outside world. I guess this section will make more
>  sense if we are just listing the server locations in section 1.> 
Sure. Basically all our sites are connected via a vpn that is served
from bastion in phx2. So, all those sites connect out to that vpn. Then
the vpn has basically 2 'zones'... a 192.168.1.x (trusted) and
192.168.100.x (less trusted). 

>  3 Network Architecture
>           < this section will show overall network architecture with
>  protocol stacks >
>      3.1 Front end
>           < similar to present section but with more detail >
>      3.2 Proxy view
>           < similar to present section but with more detail >
>      3.3 Application layer
>           < similar to present section but with more detail > 
Sounds good. 

>  4 Helping Out (or Help Us ?)
>           < this section will target two type of contributors, one who
>  can improve the quality of information present in page
>  <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Architecture>and
>  another who can provide resources.> 
Sounds good. Those might just best be links to other pages that explain
that sort of thing. 

>  This is the overall structure and type of content the page will
> have.
>  Please let me know about any additions, deletions or Improvements. 
Sounds good. Thanks for working on it! :) 

kevin

[vipin kumar]

Hi,

I need small images of Proxy server, Firewall and Load balancer as
shown in this
image<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:Infrastructure_Architecture_...
.

thanks & regards,

On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; wrote:

>  On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:47:33 +0530
>  vipin kumar <vipinkumar41(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>
>  > Hi Team!
>  >
>  > This mail is regarding Ticket
>  > 1084<https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1084>
>  >
>  > As I already informed in Infrastructure weekly meeting that I'm
>  > proposing a slight change in
>  > page<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Architecture>layout
>  > as mentioned below -
>  >
>  > 1 Global Presence
>  >          < this section is about either showing fedora servers in
>  > geographical map or just listing server locations as suggested by
>  > 'abadger1999'.>
>
>  I think just a table here with a region listed would be good.
>
>  > 2 Network Topology
>  >          < this section shows how our severs are interconnected or
>  > connected to the outside world. I guess this section will make more
>  > sense if we are just listing the server locations in section 1.>
>
>  Sure. Basically all our sites are connected via a vpn that is served
>  from bastion in phx2. So, all those sites connect out to that vpn. Then
>  the vpn has basically 2 'zones'... a 192.168.1.x (trusted) and
>  192.168.100.x (less trusted).
>
>  > 3 Network Architecture
>  >          < this section will show overall network architecture with
>  > protocol stacks >
>  >     3.1 Front end
>  >          < similar to present section but with more detail >
>  >     3.2 Proxy view
>  >          < similar to present section but with more detail >
>  >     3.3 Application layer
>  >          < similar to present section but with more detail >
>
>  Sounds good.
>
>  > 4 Helping Out (or Help Us ?)
>  >          < this section will target two type of contributors, one who
>  > can improve the quality of information present in page
>  > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Architecture>and
>  > another who can provide resources.>
>
>  Sounds good. Those might just best be links to other pages that explain
>  that sort of thing.
>
>  > This is the overall structure and type of content the page will have.
>  > Please let me know about any additions, deletions or Improvements.
>
>  Sounds good. Thanks for working on it! :)
>
>  kevin
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  infrastructure mailing list
>  infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>  


-- 
Vipin K.
Research Engineer,
C-DOTB, India

[Tristan Santore]

On 08/09/12 17:15, vipin kumar wrote:
>  Hi,
>
>  I need small images of Proxy server, Firewall and Load balancer as
>  shown in this image
>  <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:Infrastructure_Architecture_frontend....;.
>
>  thanks & regards,
>
>  On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com
>  <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>      On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:47:33 +0530
>      vipin kumar <vipinkumar41(a)gmail.com
>      <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>      > Hi Team!
>      >
>      > This mail is regarding Ticket
>      > 1084<https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1084>
>      >
>      > As I already informed in Infrastructure weekly meeting that I'm
>      > proposing a slight change in
>      >
>      page<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Architecture>layout
>      > as mentioned below -
>      >
>      > 1 Global Presence
>      >          < this section is about either showing fedora servers in
>      > geographical map or just listing server locations as suggested by
>      > 'abadger1999'.>
>
>      I think just a table here with a region listed would be good.
>
>      > 2 Network Topology
>      >          < this section shows how our severs are interconnected or
>      > connected to the outside world. I guess this section will make more
>      > sense if we are just listing the server locations in section 1.>
>
>      Sure. Basically all our sites are connected via a vpn that is served
>      from bastion in phx2. So, all those sites connect out to that vpn.
>      Then
>      the vpn has basically 2 'zones'... a 192.168.1.x (trusted) and
>      192.168.100.x (less trusted).
>
>      > 3 Network Architecture
>      >          < this section will show overall network architecture with
>      > protocol stacks >
>      >     3.1 Front end
>      >          < similar to present section but with more detail >
>      >     3.2 Proxy view
>      >          < similar to present section but with more detail >
>      >     3.3 Application layer
>      >          < similar to present section but with more detail >
>
>      Sounds good.
>
>      > 4 Helping Out (or Help Us ?)
>      >          < this section will target two type of contributors,
>      one who
>      > can improve the quality of information present in page
>      > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Architecture>and
>      > another who can provide resources.>
>
>      Sounds good. Those might just best be links to other pages that
>      explain
>      that sort of thing.
>
>      > This is the overall structure and type of content the page will
>      have.
>      > Please let me know about any additions, deletions or Improvements.
>
>      Sounds good. Thanks for working on it! :)
>
>      kevin
>
>      _______________________________________________
>      infrastructure mailing list
>      infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>      <mailto:[e-mail]>
>      https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>
>
>
>
>  -- 
>  Vipin K.
>  Research Engineer,
>  C-DOTB, India
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  infrastructure mailing list
>  infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure 
yum search dia|grep
^dia

Install, be happy, have fun.

Regards,

Tristan

-- 
Tristan Santore BSc MBCS
TS4523-RIPE
Network and Infrastructure Operations
InterNexusConnect
Mobile [phone]
Tristan.Santore(a)internexusconnect.net

Former Thawte Notary
(Please note: Thawte has closed its WoT programme down,
and I am therefore no longer able to accredit trust)

For Fedora related issues, please email me at:
TSantore(a)fedoraproject.org

[vipin kumar]

thanks!

On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Tristan Santore <
Tristan.Santore(a)internexusconnect.net&gt; wrote:

>  **
>  On 08/09/12 17:15, vipin kumar wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>
>  I need small images of Proxy server, Firewall and Load balancer as shown
>  in this
> image<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:Infrastructure_Architecture_...
>  .
>
>  thanks & regards,
>
>  On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:47:33 +0530
> > vipin kumar <vipinkumar41(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Team!
> > >
> > > This mail is regarding Ticket
> >  > 1084<https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1084>
> > >
> > > As I already informed in Infrastructure weekly meeting that I'm
> > > proposing a slight change in
> >  > page<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Architecture>layout
> > > as mentioned below -
> > >
> > > 1 Global Presence
> > >          < this section is about either showing fedora servers in
> > > geographical map or just listing server locations as suggested by
> > > 'abadger1999'.>
> >
> >  I think just a table here with a region listed would be good.
> >
> > > 2 Network Topology
> > >          < this section shows how our severs are interconnected or
> > > connected to the outside world. I guess this section will make more
> > > sense if we are just listing the server locations in section 1.>
> >
> >  Sure. Basically all our sites are connected via a vpn that is served
> > from bastion in phx2. So, all those sites connect out to that vpn. Then
> > the vpn has basically 2 'zones'... a 192.168.1.x (trusted) and
> > 192.168.100.x (less trusted).
> >
> > > 3 Network Architecture
> > >          < this section will show overall network architecture with
> > > protocol stacks >
> > >     3.1 Front end
> > >          < similar to present section but with more detail >
> > >     3.2 Proxy view
> > >          < similar to present section but with more detail >
> > >     3.3 Application layer
> > >          < similar to present section but with more detail >
> >
> >  Sounds good.
> >
> > > 4 Helping Out (or Help Us ?)
> > >          < this section will target two type of contributors, one who
> > > can improve the quality of information present in page
> >  > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Architecture>and
> > > another who can provide resources.>
> >
> >  Sounds good. Those might just best be links to other pages that explain
> > that sort of thing.
> >
> > > This is the overall structure and type of content the page will have.
> > > Please let me know about any additions, deletions or Improvements.
> >
> >  Sounds good. Thanks for working on it! :)
> >
> > kevin
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > infrastructure mailing list
> > infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
> >
>
>
>
>  --
>  Vipin K.
>  Research Engineer,
>  C-DOTB, India
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  infrastructure mailing
> [e-mail]://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>
>   yum search dia|grep ^dia
>
>  Install, be happy, have fun.
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Tristan
>
>  --
>  Tristan Santore BSc MBCS
>  TS4523-RIPE
>  Network and Infrastructure Operations
>  InterNexusConnect
>  Mobile [phone]Tristan.Santore(a)internexusconnect.net
>
>  Former Thawte Notary
>  (Please note: Thawte has closed its WoT programme down,
>  and I am therefore no longer able to accredit trust)
>
>  For Fedora related issues, please email me at:[e-mail]
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  infrastructure mailing list
>  infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>  


-- 
Vipin K.
Research Engineer,
C-DOTB, India

[vipin kumar]

On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; wrote:

>  On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:47:33 +0530
>  vipin kumar <vipinkumar41(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>
>  > Hi Team!
>  >
>  > This mail is regarding Ticket
>  > 1084<https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1084>
>  >
>  > As I already informed in Infrastructure weekly meeting that I'm
>  > proposing a slight change in
>  > page<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Architecture>layout
>  > as mentioned below -
>  >
>  > 1 Global Presence
>  >          < this section is about either showing fedora servers in
>  > geographical map or just listing server locations as suggested by
>  > 'abadger1999'.>
>
>  I think just a table here with a region listed would be good.
>  
ok, its now a list of datacenters.

>  > 2 Network Topology
>  >          < this section shows how our severs are interconnected or
>  > connected to the outside world. I guess this section will make more
>  > sense if we are just listing the server locations in section 1.>
>
>  Sure. Basically all our sites are connected via a vpn that is served
>  from bastion in phx2. So, all those sites connect out to that vpn. Then
>  the vpn has basically 2 'zones'... a 192.168.1.x (trusted) and
>  192.168.100.x (less trusted).
>
>  I have prepared initial Network Topology diagram. I guess trusted zone 
consists of
local servers and servers belonging to other datacenters comes
under less trusted zone? Please find the attached file and provide feedback.

>  > 3 Network Architecture
>  >          < this section will show overall network architecture with
>  > protocol stacks >
>  >     3.1 Front end
>  >          < similar to present section but with more detail >
>  >     3.2 Proxy view
>  >          < similar to present section but with more detail >
>  >     3.3 Application layer
>  >          < similar to present section but with more detail >
>
>  Sounds good.
>
>  yet to work on it... 
>  > 4 Helping Out (or Help Us ?)
>  >          < this section will target two type of contributors, one who
>  > can improve the quality of information present in page
>  > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Architecture>and
>  > another who can provide resources.>
>
>  Sounds good. Those might just best be links to other pages that explain
>  that sort of thing.
>
>  section completes with 2-3 statements and links to proper pages. 
>   > This is the overall structure and type of content the page will
> have.
>  > Please let me know about any additions, deletions or Improvements.
>
>  Sounds good. Thanks for working on it! :)
>
>  kevin
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  infrastructure mailing list
>  infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>  
thanks & regards,
-- 
Vipin K.
Research Engineer,
C-DOTB, India

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:38:24 +0530
vipin kumar <vipinkumar41(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

...snip...

>  > I have prepared initial Network Topology diagram. I guess
> trusted
>  > zone
>  consists of local servers and servers belonging to other datacenters
>  comes under less trusted zone? Please find the attached file and
>  provide feedback. 
All the machines on the vpn are 'trusted' by default... there's a very
few that we have more firewalling on so they aren't able to get to
much.

The file looks fine to me as a generic diagram. ;) 

kevin

[vipin kumar]

Hi Team,
The page is almost ready for reviews and feedback. Please have a look at
following page and provide feedback.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Vipin

thanks & regards,
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:47 PM, vipin kumar <vipinkumar41(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

>  Hi Team!
>
>  This mail is regarding Ticket
> 1084<https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1084>
>
>  As I already informed in Infrastructure weekly meeting that I'm proposing
>  a slight change in
> page<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Architecture>layout as mentioned
> below -
>
>  1 Global Presence
>           < this section is about either showing fedora servers in
>  geographical map or just listing server locations as suggested by
>  'abadger1999'.>
>  2 Network Topology
>           < this section shows how our severs are interconnected or
>  connected to the outside world. I guess this section will make more sense
>  if we are just listing the server locations in section 1.>
>
>  3 Network Architecture
>           < this section will show overall network architecture with
>  protocol stacks >
>      3.1 Front end
>           < similar to present section but with more detail >
>      3.2 Proxy view
>           < similar to present section but with more detail >
>      3.3 Application layer
>           < similar to present section but with more detail >
>  4 Helping Out (or Help Us ?)
>           < this section will target two type of contributors, one who can
>  improve the quality of information present in page
>  <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Architecture>and another
>  who can provide resources.>
>
>  This is the overall structure and type of content the page will have.
>  Please let me know about any additions, deletions or Improvements.
>
>
>  Thanks & Regards,
>
>  --
>  Vipin K.
>  IRC ID: _love_hurts_
>  


-- 
Vipin K.
Research Engineer,
C-DOTB, India

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 21:44:19 +0530
vipin kumar <vipinkumar41(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

>  Hi Team,
>  The page is almost ready for reviews and feedback. Please have a look
>  at following page and provide feedback.
>  
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Vipin 
Awesome. :) 

Just a few minor nitpicks: 

- I'd just say we should remove any mention of pix firewalls or nat in
  the diagrams. In phx2 we are behind a firewall setup, but all our
  other sites are just directly on the net, and we don't control or
  have any knowledge of the phx2 firewall stuff anyhow. ;) 

- Might make the vpn lines bi directional. For app servers and such
  data travels back and forth both ways over the vpn for requests. 

- "Authorization can be done at Proxy Server though it should be done at
  application level for security reasons" Depending on what auth you
  mean here, it should always be done at the application level... when
  someone logs into FAS it is a request: proxy->fasserver and then they
  have a cookie that lasts for X minutes to authenticate against the
  various FAS using applications. Nothing should really auth on the
  proxy directly that I can think of... 

- For the 'data layer' in the last diagram, might note that that is
  mostly database servers. I guess in the case of the wiki it's also
  nfs storage (for attachements). 

Overall this looks great!

Thanks again for working on it. 

kevin

[vipin kumar]

On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; wrote:

>  On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 21:44:19 +0530
>  vipin kumar <vipinkumar41(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>
>  > Hi Team,
>  > The page is almost ready for reviews and feedback. Please have a look
>  > at following page and provide feedback.
>  >
>  > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Vipin
>
>  Awesome. :)
>
>  Just a few minor nitpicks:
>
>  - I'd just say we should remove any mention of pix firewalls or nat in
>    the diagrams. In phx2 we are behind a firewall setup, but all our
>    other sites are just directly on the net, and we don't control or
>    have any knowledge of the phx2 firewall stuff anyhow. ;)
>  
fixed. its just "Firewall" now at one place and removed second one from
fig.

>  - Might make the vpn lines bi directional. For app servers and such
>    data travels back and forth both ways over the vpn for requests.
>  
point noted....done

>  - "Authorization can be done at Proxy Server though it should be done at
>    application level for security reasons" Depending on what auth you
>    mean here, it should always be done at the application level... when
>    someone logs into FAS it is a request: proxy->fasserver and then they
>    have a cookie that lasts for X minutes to authenticate against the
>    various FAS using applications. Nothing should really auth on the
>    proxy directly that I can think of...
>  
this information I just copied from old fig and moved to
description......removed it from description and flow chart updated.

>  - For the 'data layer' in the last diagram, might note that that is
>    mostly database servers. I guess in the case of the wiki it's also
>    nfs storage (for attachements).
>  
 Fig just mentioned "data layer" but no information about it like
"proxy
layer" cloud in that fig......updated fig....done! I guess :)

thanks & regards,

>  Overall this looks great!
>
>  Thanks again for working on it.
>
>  kevin
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  infrastructure mailing list
>  infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>  


-- 
Vipin K.
Research Engineer,
C-DOTB, India

[Kevin Fenzi]

Looks good to me now... 

Lets see if anyone else has feedback for a few days and if not, move it
in place and close the ticket. ;) 

kevin

[vipin kumar]

So, where we are?

On 9/23/12, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; wrote:
>  Looks good to me now...
>
>  Lets see if anyone else has feedback for a few days and if not, move it
>  in place and close the ticket. ;)
>
>  kevin
>  

-- 
Vipin K.
Research Engineer,
C-DOTB, India

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 10:37:13 +0530
vipin kumar <vipinkumar41(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

>  So, where we are? 
I don't see any more feedback... so please do move the contents of your
reworked page over the old one and we can close out that ticket. ;) 

kevin
--
>  On 9/23/12, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; wrote:
>  > Looks good to me now...
>  >
>  > Lets see if anyone else has feedback for a few days and if not,
>  > move it in place and close the ticket. ;)
>  >
>  > kevin
>  >
>  
>

[vipin kumar]

ok :)

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; wrote:

>  On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 10:37:13 +0530
>  vipin kumar <vipinkumar41(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>
>  > So, where we are?
>
>  I don't see any more feedback... so please do move the contents of your
>  reworked page over the old one and we can close out that ticket. ;)
>
>  kevin
>  --
>  > On 9/23/12, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; wrote:
>  > > Looks good to me now...
>  > >
>  > > Lets see if anyone else has feedback for a few days and if not,
>  > > move it in place and close the ticket. ;)
>  > >
>  > > kevin
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  infrastructure mailing list
>  infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>  


-- 
Vipin K.
Research Engineer,
C-DOTB, India

[vipin kumar]

its done :)...

thanks & regards,

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:04 PM, vipin kumar <vipinkumar41(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

>  ok :)
>
>  On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 10:37:13 +0530
> > vipin kumar <vipinkumar41(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
> >
> > > So, where we are?
> >
> > I don't see any more feedback... so please do move the contents of your
> > reworked page over the old one and we can close out that ticket. ;)
> >
> > kevin
> > --
> > > On 9/23/12, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; wrote:
> > > > Looks good to me now...
> > > >
> > > > Lets see if anyone else has feedback for a few days and if not,
> > > > move it in place and close the ticket. ;)
> > > >
> > > > kevin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > infrastructure mailing list
> > infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
> >
>
>
>
>  --
>  Vipin K.
>  Research Engineer,
>  C-DOTB, India
>  


-- 
Vipin K.
Research Engineer,
C-DOTB, India