Hi
Why is the archives of this list not public? If sensitive details are being discussed in this list, the list membership itself should be moderated which is not the case at present. If anyone can join the list, I dont see any harm in letting search engines and other services index the content.
Rahul
On 1/23/07, Rahul Sundaram sundaram@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi
Why is the archives of this list not public? If sensitive details are being discussed in this list, the list membership itself should be moderated which is not the case at present. If anyone can join the list, I dont see any harm in letting search engines and other services index the content.
We do have a private (invite only) list that we use for sensitive things though its rarely used, last message was in early November. I'm conflicted about this so I will defer to the community. Basically I guess what we're trying to accomplish is to let search engines index the list?
-Mike
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 19:15 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
On 1/23/07, Rahul Sundaram sundaram@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi
Why is the archives of this list not public? If sensitive details are being discussed in this list, the list membership itself should be moderated which is not the case at present. If anyone can join the list, I dont see any harm in letting search engines and other services index the content.
We do have a private (invite only) list that we use for sensitive things though its rarely used, last message was in early November. I'm conflicted about this so I will defer to the community. Basically I guess what we're trying to accomplish is to let search engines index the list?
I don't have a problem with infrastructure-list being viewable by all. In fact, I probably would find it beneficial to have it available. As you say sysadmin-list exists if there's things that need to be discussed in true privacy.
-Toshio
Mike McGrath wrote:
We do have a private (invite only) list that we use for sensitive things though its rarely used, last message was in early November. I'm conflicted about this so I will defer to the community. Basically I guess what we're trying to accomplish is to let search engines index the list?
More importantly increase visibility of the discussions going on here to the rest of the community. I originally thought this was a completely private list for the infrastructure team until you or someone in #fedora-admin said that there was a separate private list and this was a open one with just the archives being closed. I had Thomas Chung (of Fedoranews.org) ask me the same thing a couple of days back. There is good stuff being discussed here. Let is be visible. It makes it easier for me and others to know what is done and maybe that will attract more interest and contributors.
Rahul
Mike McGrath wrote:
We do have a private (invite only) list that we use for sensitive things though its rarely used, last message was in early November. I'm conflicted about this so I will defer to the community. Basically I guess what we're trying to accomplish is to let search engines index the list?
As long as we still have the private (invite only) list for items of sensitive nature, which do seem to be relatively rare, I don't see a problem letting the archives for this list be open.
--Jeffrey
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 22:27, Jeffrey Tadlock wrote:
As long as we still have the private (invite only) list for items of sensitive nature, which do seem to be relatively rare, I don't see a problem letting the archives for this list be open.
Well, except for the email harvesting. :/
On 1/23/07, Jesse Keating jkeating@redhat.com wrote:
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 22:27, Jeffrey Tadlock wrote:
As long as we still have the private (invite only) list for items of sensitive nature, which do seem to be relatively rare, I don't see a problem letting the archives for this list be open.
Well, except for the email harvesting. :/
Luke, if you wouldn't mind.... Make it so :-D
-Mike
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 08:54:43PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
On 1/23/07, Jesse Keating jkeating@redhat.com wrote:
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 22:27, Jeffrey Tadlock wrote:
As long as we still have the private (invite only) list for items of sensitive nature, which do seem to be relatively rare, I don't see a problem letting the archives for this list be open.
Well, except for the email harvesting. :/
Luke, if you wouldn't mind.... Make it so :-D
fedora-infrastructure-list archives are now public.
luke
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Jeffrey Tadlock -
Jesse Keating -
Luke Macken -
Mike McGrath -
Rahul Sundaram -
Toshio Kuratomi