FBR: Stop building F28 AH image artifacts during bodhi run

[Sinny Kumari]

Hi,

Next Fedora Atomic Host TwoWeek release will be based on F29
stream and same will be followed in future releases.
So, building F28 AH artifacts during bodhi run is
not needed.

Additionally, use testing refs to build image artifacts
for updates-testing compose and updates refs to build
updates compose during bodhi run.

Can I get +1 for the patch (available in email attachment.)?

Thanks,
Sinny

[Dusty Mabe]

On 10/12/2018 04:13 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
>  Hi,
>  
>  Next Fedora Atomic Host TwoWeek release will be based on F29
>  stream and same will be followed in future releases.
>  So, building F28 AH artifacts during bodhi run is
>  not needed.
>  
>  Additionally, use testing refs to build image artifacts
>  for updates-testing compose and updates refs to build
>  updates compose during bodhi run.
>  
>  Can I get +1 for the patch (available in email attachment.)? 
Patch looks good to me. +1

Dusty

[Randy Barlow]

On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 13:43 +0530, Sinny Kumari wrote:
>  Next Fedora Atomic Host TwoWeek release will be based on F29
>  stream and same will be followed in future releases.
>  So, building F28 AH artifacts during bodhi run is
>  not needed. 
Shouldn't we wait until Fedora 29 is released to stop producing Fedora
28 content?

[Dusty Mabe]

On 10/12/2018 11:54 AM, Randy Barlow wrote:
>  On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 13:43 +0530, Sinny Kumari wrote:
> > Next Fedora Atomic Host TwoWeek release will be based on F29
> > stream and same will be followed in future releases.
> > So, building F28 AH artifacts during bodhi run is
> > not needed.
>  
>  Shouldn't we wait until Fedora 29 is released to stop producing Fedora
>  28 content? 
We're still producing Fedora 28 Atomic Host OSTree content, just no longer
producing qcow2 and ISO images since we don't plan to do any more two week
releases of Fedora 28.

Does that answer the question? 

Dusty

[Kevin Fenzi]

+1 here

kevin

[Sinny Kumari]

We have 2 +1(assuming that Dusty's vote count for FBR).
@dustymabe Can you please push this patch to ansible repo and run playbook?

Thanks in advance!

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 10:15 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; wrote:

>  +1 here
>
>  kevin
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to
>  infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>  List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  List Archives:
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]...
>  

-- 
http://sinny.io/

[Dusty Mabe]

On 10/12/2018 01:03 PM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
>  We have 2 +1(assuming that Dusty's vote count for FBR).
>  @dustymabe Can you please push this patch to ansible repo and run playbook?
>  
>  Thanks in advance! 
I don't think my vote officially counts :( - but I will push it once we
get another +1 :) 

Dusty

[Stephen John Smoogen]

+🆗


On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 04:14, Sinny Kumari <ksinny(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

>  Hi,
>
>  Next Fedora Atomic Host TwoWeek release will be based on F29
>  stream and same will be followed in future releases.
>  So, building F28 AH artifacts during bodhi run is
>  not needed.
>
>  Additionally, use testing refs to build image artifacts
>  for updates-testing compose and updates refs to build
>  updates compose during bodhi run.
>
>  Can I get +1 for the patch (available in email attachment.)?
>
>  Thanks,
>  Sinny
>  _______________________________________________
>  infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to
>  infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>  List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  List Archives:
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]...
>  

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.

[Dusty Mabe]

On 10/12/2018 01:14 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>  
>  
>  On 10/12/2018 01:03 PM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
> > We have 2 +1(assuming that Dusty's vote count for FBR).
> > @dustymabe Can you please push this patch to ansible repo and run playbook?
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
>  
>  I don't think my vote officially counts :( - but I will push it once we
>  get another +1 :) 
>   
pushed and playbook ran!

Dusty

[Sinny Kumari]

On Sat 13 Oct, 2018, 12:04 AM Dusty Mabe, <dusty(a)dustymabe.com&gt; wrote:

>  On 10/12/2018 01:14 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> >  
> >  
>  > On 10/12/2018 01:03 PM, Sinny
> Kumari wrote:
>  >> We have 2 +1(assuming that Dusty's vote count for FBR).
>  >> @dustymabe Can you please push this patch to ansible repo and run
>  playbook?
>  >
> >  
>  >> Thanks in advance!
> >  
>  > I don't think my vote officially counts :( - but I
> will push it once we
>  > get another +1 :)
> >  
>  pushed and playbook ran!
>  
Thanks Dusty!

Dusty
>