1:29 p.m.
Hi,
I have made my Proposal wiki page[1] for your reference , do comment
and review it and help me in improving it as required.
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013/Student_Application_rag3nix/Gitlib
IRC : rag3nix , rag3
--
Thanks and Regards
Mrigesh Pokhrel
+91 9807585021
2:15 p.m.
On Sat, 4 May 2013 23:59:41 +0530
Mrigesh Pokhrel <mrigeshpokhrel(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I have made my Proposal wiki page[1] for your reference , do
comment and review it and help me in improving it as required.
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013/Student_Application_rag3nix/Gitlib
IRC : rag3nix , rag3
So, this idea has changed a lot since it was on the idea page.
Basically the current thing that needs doing is packaging gitlab and
all it's vast dependencies into Fedora/EPEL. This will allow anyone
interested in running it to simply yum install it and go, which will be
great. :)
This would allow us down the road to deploy one in Fedora
Infrastructure if it meets our needs. (and it would use the normal RFR
process at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Request_For_Resources?rd=Infrastructure/RFR
)
See discussion on the infrastructure list about how gitlab may or may
not meet our needs (mostly around how they handle public repos).
Additionally, if we do decide to setup gitlab, I think it very likely
we would NOT move all our hosted projects to it, but instead allow it
as a opt-in or additional resource (possibly even allowing anyone with
a fedora account to just make their own projects there).
So, I would suggest you re-work your proposal as packging it up (or
choose another one if you are not interested in packaging).
I've reworked the suggestions page:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Summer_coding_ideas_for_2013&...
to better reflect this.
Sorry for the confusion.
kevin
12:51 a.m.
Hi,
So, The GitLab hosting project has been scrubbed and replaced with
packaging. What about the GSOC submission? Anyways , the change is not the
issue. A few days back Vit sent me links about packaging[1][2], I have
already started on it . But then still , how would the change in project
idea affect my evaluation , as I understand it changes the whole proposal
idea so should I change my proposal accordingly and am I allowed to do so
now?
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
On Sat, 4 May 2013 23:59:41 +0530
Mrigesh Pokhrel <mrigeshpokhrel(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have made my Proposal wiki page[1] for your reference , do
> comment and review it and help me in improving it as required.
>
> [1]
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013/Student_Application_rag3nix/Gitlib
>
> IRC : rag3nix , rag3
So, this idea has changed a lot since it was on the idea page.
Basically the current thing that needs doing is packaging gitlab and
all it's vast dependencies into Fedora/EPEL. This will allow anyone
interested in running it to simply yum install it and go, which will be
great. :)
This would allow us down the road to deploy one in Fedora
Infrastructure if it meets our needs. (and it would use the normal RFR
process at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Request_For_Resources?rd=Infrastructure/RFR
)
See discussion on the infrastructure list about how gitlab may or may
not meet our needs (mostly around how they handle public repos).
Additionally, if we do decide to setup gitlab, I think it very likely
we would NOT move all our hosted projects to it, but instead allow it
as a opt-in or additional resource (possibly even allowing anyone with
a fedora account to just make their own projects there).
So, I would suggest you re-work your proposal as packging it up (or
choose another one if you are not interested in packaging).
I've reworked the suggestions page:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Summer_coding_ideas_for_2013&...
to better reflect this.
Sorry for the confusion.
kevin
--
Thanks and Regards
Mrigesh Pokhrel
+91 9807585021
10:43 a.m.
On Sun, 5 May 2013 11:21:53 +0530
Mrigesh Pokhrel <mrigeshpokhrel(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
So, The GitLab hosting project has been scrubbed and replaced with
packaging. What about the GSOC submission?
The "idea" for it has been around for years, but it was simply carried
over from previous years. We recently looked more closely at it and
decided that it wouldn't really be a great fit until they added more
public repo ability. In any case it would need to be packaged before we
can use it in Fedora Infrastructure and doing so is probibly already
more than a GSoC worth of work. ;(
Anyways , the change is
not the issue. A few days back Vit sent me links about
packaging[1][2], I have already started on it .
Note that there are at least 2 other people interested in this as well.
But then still , how
would the change in project idea affect my evaluation , as I
understand it changes the whole proposal idea so should I change my
proposal accordingly and am I allowed to do so now?
I don't know what the deadlines or process is there.
Sorry for changing the ideas page so late, but I wanted to make it
reflect more reality. :(
kevin
--
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 4 May 2013 23:59:41 +0530
> Mrigesh Pokhrel <mrigeshpokhrel(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I have made my Proposal wiki page[1] for your reference , do
> > comment and review it and help me in improving it as required.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013/Student_Application_rag3nix/Gitlib
> >
> > IRC : rag3nix , rag3
>
> So, this idea has changed a lot since it was on the idea page.
>
> Basically the current thing that needs doing is packaging gitlab and
> all it's vast dependencies into Fedora/EPEL. This will allow anyone
> interested in running it to simply yum install it and go, which
> will be great. :)
>
> This would allow us down the road to deploy one in Fedora
> Infrastructure if it meets our needs. (and it would use the normal
> RFR process at:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Request_For_Resources?rd=Infrastructure/RFR
> )
> See discussion on the infrastructure list about how gitlab may or
> may not meet our needs (mostly around how they handle public repos).
> Additionally, if we do decide to setup gitlab, I think it very
> likely we would NOT move all our hosted projects to it, but instead
> allow it as a opt-in or additional resource (possibly even allowing
> anyone with a fedora account to just make their own projects there).
>
> So, I would suggest you re-work your proposal as packging it up (or
> choose another one if you are not interested in packaging).
>
> I've reworked the suggestions page:
>
>
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Summer_coding_ideas_for_2013&...
> to better reflect this.
>
> Sorry for the confusion.
>
> kevin
>
11:28 a.m.
Hi Kevin,
I am as interested in this project as I was before, the changing of
Title isnt an issue . What I am worried about is my proposal does not fit
with the current idea. So I was asking the mentor for this project if I am
allowed to modify it. I mailed bckurera and he said he has no problem as
long as the mentor is ready with it. I have read about the packaging and am
talking on ML about RFR and same. I have a proposal ready to resubmit on
fedora wiki. Just waiting if I am allowed to do so.
Regards
Mrigesh Pokhrel
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
On Sun, 5 May 2013 11:21:53 +0530
Mrigesh Pokhrel <mrigeshpokhrel(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> So, The GitLab hosting project has been scrubbed and replaced with
> packaging. What about the GSOC submission?
The "idea" for it has been around for years, but it was simply carried
over from previous years. We recently looked more closely at it and
decided that it wouldn't really be a great fit until they added more
public repo ability. In any case it would need to be packaged before we
can use it in Fedora Infrastructure and doing so is probibly already
more than a GSoC worth of work. ;(
> Anyways , the change is
> not the issue. A few days back Vit sent me links about
> packaging[1][2], I have already started on it .
Note that there are at least 2 other people interested in this as well.
> But then still , how
> would the change in project idea affect my evaluation , as I
> understand it changes the whole proposal idea so should I change my
> proposal accordingly and am I allowed to do so now?
I don't know what the deadlines or process is there.
Sorry for changing the ideas page so late, but I wanted to make it
reflect more reality. :(
kevin
--
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
> [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby
>
>
> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 4 May 2013 23:59:41 +0530
> > Mrigesh Pokhrel <mrigeshpokhrel(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I have made my Proposal wiki page[1] for your reference , do
> > > comment and review it and help me in improving it as required.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013/Student_Application_rag3nix/Gitlib
> > >
> > > IRC : rag3nix , rag3
> >
> > So, this idea has changed a lot since it was on the idea page.
> >
> > Basically the current thing that needs doing is packaging gitlab and
> > all it's vast dependencies into Fedora/EPEL. This will allow anyone
> > interested in running it to simply yum install it and go, which
> > will be great. :)
> >
> > This would allow us down the road to deploy one in Fedora
> > Infrastructure if it meets our needs. (and it would use the normal
> > RFR process at:
> >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Request_For_Resources?rd=Infrastructure/RFR
> > )
> > See discussion on the infrastructure list about how gitlab may or
> > may not meet our needs (mostly around how they handle public repos).
> > Additionally, if we do decide to setup gitlab, I think it very
> > likely we would NOT move all our hosted projects to it, but instead
> > allow it as a opt-in or additional resource (possibly even allowing
> > anyone with a fedora account to just make their own projects there).
> >
> > So, I would suggest you re-work your proposal as packging it up (or
> > choose another one if you are not interested in packaging).
> >
> > I've reworked the suggestions page:
> >
> >
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Summer_coding_ideas_for_2013&...
> > to better reflect this.
> >
> > Sorry for the confusion.
> >
> > kevin
> >
>
>
>
--
Thanks and Regards
Mrigesh Pokhrel
+91 9807585021
11:38 a.m.
Hi all,
Sorry to interfere (I'm not involved with this project), but I guess if
this project is very large and the ideas page has been refreshed, then it
can be split into GSoC-worthy portions over the summer among interested
applicants? That way, it benefits the project. As long as it doesn't appear
to be teamwork, and can be split into chunks that don't depend on another
person's work, it should be in keeping with GSoC's rules as well.
Thank you,
Sarup Banskota
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Mrigesh Pokhrel <mrigeshpokhrel(a)gmail.com>wrote:
Hi Kevin,
I am as interested in this project as I was before, the changing of
Title isnt an issue . What I am worried about is my proposal does not fit
with the current idea. So I was asking the mentor for this project if I am
allowed to modify it. I mailed bckurera and he said he has no problem as
long as the mentor is ready with it. I have read about the packaging and am
talking on ML about RFR and same. I have a proposal ready to resubmit on
fedora wiki. Just waiting if I am allowed to do so.
Regards
Mrigesh Pokhrel
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 5 May 2013 11:21:53 +0530
> Mrigesh Pokhrel <mrigeshpokhrel(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > So, The GitLab hosting project has been scrubbed and replaced with
> > packaging. What about the GSOC submission?
>
> The "idea" for it has been around for years, but it was simply carried
> over from previous years. We recently looked more closely at it and
> decided that it wouldn't really be a great fit until they added more
> public repo ability. In any case it would need to be packaged before we
> can use it in Fedora Infrastructure and doing so is probibly already
> more than a GSoC worth of work. ;(
>
> > Anyways , the change is
> > not the issue. A few days back Vit sent me links about
> > packaging[1][2], I have already started on it .
>
> Note that there are at least 2 other people interested in this as well.
>
> > But then still , how
> > would the change in project idea affect my evaluation , as I
> > understand it changes the whole proposal idea so should I change my
> > proposal accordingly and am I allowed to do so now?
>
> I don't know what the deadlines or process is there.
>
> Sorry for changing the ideas page so late, but I wanted to make it
> reflect more reality. :(
>
> kevin
> --
> >
> > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
> > [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 4 May 2013 23:59:41 +0530
> > > Mrigesh Pokhrel <mrigeshpokhrel(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I have made my Proposal wiki page[1] for your reference , do
> > > > comment and review it and help me in improving it as required.
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013/Student_Application_rag3nix/Gitlib
> > > >
> > > > IRC : rag3nix , rag3
> > >
> > > So, this idea has changed a lot since it was on the idea page.
> > >
> > > Basically the current thing that needs doing is packaging gitlab and
> > > all it's vast dependencies into Fedora/EPEL. This will allow anyone
> > > interested in running it to simply yum install it and go, which
> > > will be great. :)
> > >
> > > This would allow us down the road to deploy one in Fedora
> > > Infrastructure if it meets our needs. (and it would use the normal
> > > RFR process at:
> > >
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Request_For_Resources?rd=Infrastructure/RFR
> > > )
> > > See discussion on the infrastructure list about how gitlab may or
> > > may not meet our needs (mostly around how they handle public repos).
> > > Additionally, if we do decide to setup gitlab, I think it very
> > > likely we would NOT move all our hosted projects to it, but instead
> > > allow it as a opt-in or additional resource (possibly even allowing
> > > anyone with a fedora account to just make their own projects there).
> > >
> > > So, I would suggest you re-work your proposal as packging it up (or
> > > choose another one if you are not interested in packaging).
> > >
> > > I've reworked the suggestions page:
> > >
> > >
>
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Summer_coding_ideas_for_2013&...
> > > to better reflect this.
> > >
> > > Sorry for the confusion.
> > >
> > > kevin
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
Thanks and Regards
Mrigesh Pokhrel
+91 9807585021
_______________________________________________
summer-coding mailing list
summer-coding(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/summer-coding
12:03 p.m.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Sarup Banskota <sbanskota08(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry to interfere (I'm not involved with this project), but I guess if this
project is very large and the ideas page has been refreshed, then it can be
split into GSoC-worthy portions over the summer among interested applicants?
That way, it benefits the project. As long as it doesn't appear to be
teamwork, and can be split into chunks that don't depend on another person's
work, it should be in keeping with GSoC's rules as well.
I really want to see how many people will actually volunteer to any
project if we say that please work on it but we will not count that as
part of gsoc.
Kushal
1:21 p.m.
Hi,
There are many who have no knowledge of GSOC and want to contribute but
have no idea how to do so. GSOC is a platform with an added incentive.
Regards,
Mrigesh Pokhrel
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Kushal Das <kushaldas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Sarup Banskota
<sbanskota08(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry to interfere (I'm not involved with this project), but I guess if
this
> project is very large and the ideas page has been refreshed, then it can
be
> split into GSoC-worthy portions over the summer among interested
applicants?
> That way, it benefits the project. As long as it doesn't appear to be
> teamwork, and can be split into chunks that don't depend on another
person's
> work, it should be in keeping with GSoC's rules as well.
I really want to see how many people will actually volunteer to any
project if we say that please work on it but we will not count that as
part of gsoc.
Kushal
_______________________________________________
summer-coding mailing list
summer-coding(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/summer-coding
--
Thanks and Regards
Mrigesh Pokhrel
+91 9807585021
1:50 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 05/05/2013 06:03 PM, Kushal Das wrote:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Sarup Banskota
<sbanskota08(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry to interfere (I'm not involved with this project), but I
> guess if this project is very large and the ideas page has been
> refreshed, then it can be split into GSoC-worthy portions over
> the summer among interested applicants? That way, it benefits the
> project. As long as it doesn't appear to be teamwork, and can be
> split into chunks that don't depend on another person's work, it
> should be in keeping with GSoC's rules as well.
I really want to see how many people will actually volunteer to
any project if we say that please work on it but we will not count
that as part of gsoc.
Kushal _______________________________________________
summer-coding mailing list summer-coding(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/summer-coding
A lot of people would not be able to afford to spend time on projects
like this without programmes like GSOC, that's what makes it so great!
I know it may seem like "oh these folks are just doing it for the
money", but many do it because the money enables them to do it (don't
have to spend all their time doing something pointless like flipping
burgers). Even though they many people would like to do it anyway,
they have to spend all their time making as much money as they can so
that they can go back to continue their studies.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=Eq/N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2:19 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Dear Mrigesh,
I have looked at your GSoC proposal, and would like to notify you of a few major things
you seem to have forgotten:
- - The infrastructure team requires everything that's deployed in the Fedora
infrastructure to be packaged as an RPM, so that we can deploy and maintain it easily.
- - To get anything hosted in our infrastructure, you will need to submit an Request For
Resources, for this please look https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Request_For_Resources.
- - Please note that the current versions of RHEL (5/6) have Ruby versions that are too
old to run gitlab, so you will have to package them for Fedora. This might impact the
willingness of the Infrastructure team to host it.
I think it might be a better target to just get gitlab packaged for Fedora during the
GSoC, as there are a lot of Ruby gems you still need to package.
Regards,
Patrick Uiterwijk
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 11:59:41PM +0530, Mrigesh Pokhrel wrote:
Hi,
I have made my Proposal wiki page[1] for your reference , do comment
and review it and help me in improving it as required.
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013/Student_Application_rag3nix/Gitlib
IRC : rag3nix , rag3
--
Thanks and Regards
Mrigesh Pokhrel
+91 9807585021
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)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=DtbU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
1:47 a.m.
Hi Patrick ,
Thank, but would submitting a ROR start early in this
project , or after the packaging would be done? And in this scenario how
would one go on about submitting a ticket for RFR?
Regards,
Mrigesh
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk(a)gmail.com>wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Dear Mrigesh,
I have looked at your GSoC proposal, and would like to notify you of a few
major things you seem to have forgotten:
- - The infrastructure team requires everything that's deployed in the
Fedora infrastructure to be packaged as an RPM, so that we can deploy and
maintain it easily.
- - To get anything hosted in our infrastructure, you will need to submit
an Request For Resources, for this please look
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Request_For_Resources.
- - Please note that the current versions of RHEL (5/6) have Ruby versions
that are too old to run gitlab, so you will have to package them for
Fedora. This might impact the willingness of the Infrastructure team to
host it.
I think it might be a better target to just get gitlab packaged for Fedora
during the GSoC, as there are a lot of Ruby gems you still need to package.
Regards,
Patrick Uiterwijk
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 11:59:41PM +0530, Mrigesh Pokhrel wrote:
> Hi,
> I have made my Proposal wiki page[1] for your reference , do comment
> and review it and help me in improving it as required.
>
> [1]
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013/Student_Application_rag3nix/Gitlib
>
> IRC : rag3nix , rag3
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards
> Mrigesh Pokhrel
> +91 9807585021
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
--
Thanks and Regards
Mrigesh Pokhrel
+91 9807585021
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)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=DtbU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
3:41 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Dear Mrigresh,
As noted on the web page I linked you to, you need to make sure it is packaged BEFORE you
file your RFR: "If your resource requires packages, please make sure that you create,
get approved and have your package(s) available in Fedora and/or EPEL before you file your
RFR ticket.".
The process for submtting an RFR is also outlined on that webpage.
Regards,
Patrick
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 12:17:50PM +0530, Mrigesh Pokhrel wrote:
Hi Patrick ,
Thank, but would submitting a ROR start early in this
project , or after the packaging would be done? And in this scenario how
would one go on about submitting a ticket for RFR?
Regards,
Mrigesh
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk(a)gmail.com>wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Dear Mrigesh,
>
> I have looked at your GSoC proposal, and would like to notify you of a few
> major things you seem to have forgotten:
> - - The infrastructure team requires everything that's deployed in the
> Fedora infrastructure to be packaged as an RPM, so that we can deploy and
> maintain it easily.
> - - To get anything hosted in our infrastructure, you will need to submit
> an Request For Resources, for this please look
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Request_For_Resources.
> - - Please note that the current versions of RHEL (5/6) have Ruby versions
> that are too old to run gitlab, so you will have to package them for
> Fedora. This might impact the willingness of the Infrastructure team to
> host it.
>
> I think it might be a better target to just get gitlab packaged for Fedora
> during the GSoC, as there are a lot of Ruby gems you still need to package.
>
> Regards,
> Patrick Uiterwijk
>
>
>
> On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 11:59:41PM +0530, Mrigesh Pokhrel wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have made my Proposal wiki page[1] for your reference , do comment
> > and review it and help me in improving it as required.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013/Student_Application_rag3nix/Gitlib
> >
> > IRC : rag3nix , rag3
> >
> > --
> > Thanks and Regards
> > Mrigesh Pokhrel
> > +91 9807585021
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > infrastructure mailing list
> > infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJRhV8mAAoJEIZXmA2atR5QzsoQAKezXjzVn90Y/zDAJAqz8nUK
> Z/AaUfUSgPCU7AMR8fuxyrYhQWGZomAKVQK0U5ZSbS7NuERaENyGzvKa1I2xomBm
> NheByVWYq4e6Sy2R1ibt+g2vJziyCz3hTEY2HCdFaH5wptPK/kwNUlLiJg7v4NyX
> 7Bh9Q7m55zyj+Ch241C3QN12q4gPVXc4XAPRV6XGIIT6xpj+r/Cr68EDFOfLOqOW
> fNrnA7y9zaAvX9vG8M8duhLPKC3JdIwskylWndPnezL0P+qpFu/7pE2YHtEmQCBT
> eZ0HwHUk6og6c32j2kg5mQu4D+Lvdl6Oo1CFX7obCHL0RvmdMDgo+W6sgVk4cxJi
> mm/rxLAlYUDt7efRf9+L8QbO8LwryZBXqC8ROK+XX7kC0AxSEOY8+3TvN8gPtwLg
> 2MWZRtpdrz2RONQxvAcl1+g6Mg0K1MvPsAisRESqUSE7gbgN5XYiTvljIGbd4ztW
> ioeyCgCcK1ka9PWzP2gXyUrEy5Yzl3S96C9sl6MgJf6CmcEOPWmhXP5itogx6OOq
> fzqj5NXZZp2UY6J5y2tmG5TcVV6idPxUTr+3bcSOrguQqOqL5Wr0hUo92y9nRGM5
> T01jK/EsZXpSGkOsm4df4Z4N7yFGLUmB8Jbdv+kAIU1HIeqrPHhtLhcoJpqYwqxt
> Gsods6i0U5ersPLi0IBa
> =DtbU
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
_______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
--
Thanks and Regards
Mrigesh Pokhrel
+91 9807585021
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)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=4pFb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
4:01 a.m.
Hi Patrick
Packaging I understand. One needs to create a rpm installable package as
well specifying their dependencies. This is the most basic I am talking
about. But I intend to ask, if I create a package why would I need RFR?
Do all packages need RFR? How do I decide that a package I created needs
a RFR? Sorry if it sounds too naive, but I would like to be clear about it.
Regards,
Mrigesh Pokhrel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Dear Mrigresh,
As noted on the web page I linked you to, you need to make sure it is packaged BEFORE you
file your RFR: "If your resource requires packages, please make sure that you create,
get approved and have your package(s) available in Fedora and/or EPEL before you file your
RFR ticket.".
The process for submtting an RFR is also outlined on that webpage.
Regards,
Patrick
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 12:17:50PM +0530, Mrigesh Pokhrel wrote:
> Hi Patrick ,
> Thank, but would submitting a ROR start early in this
> project , or after the packaging would be done? And in this scenario how
> would one go on about submitting a ticket for RFR?
>
> Regards,
> Mrigesh
>
>
> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk
<puiterwijk(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>> Dear Mrigesh,
>>
>> I have looked at your GSoC proposal, and would like to notify you of a few
>> major things you seem to have forgotten:
>> - - The infrastructure team requires everything that's deployed in the
>> Fedora infrastructure to be packaged as an RPM, so that we can deploy and
>> maintain it easily.
>> - - To get anything hosted in our infrastructure, you will need to submit
>> an Request For Resources, for this please look
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Request_For_Resources.
>> - - Please note that the current versions of RHEL (5/6) have Ruby versions
>> that are too old to run gitlab, so you will have to package them for
>> Fedora. This might impact the willingness of the Infrastructure team to
>> host it.
>>
>> I think it might be a better target to just get gitlab packaged for Fedora
>> during the GSoC, as there are a lot of Ruby gems you still need to package.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Patrick Uiterwijk
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 11:59:41PM +0530, Mrigesh Pokhrel wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I have made my Proposal wiki page[1] for your reference , do comment
>>> and review it and help me in improving it as required.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013/Student_Application_rag3nix/Gitlib
>>> IRC : rag3nix , rag3
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks and Regards
>>> Mrigesh Pokhrel
>>> +91 9807585021
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> infrastructure mailing list
>>> infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJRhV8mAAoJEIZXmA2atR5QzsoQAKezXjzVn90Y/zDAJAqz8nUK
>> Z/AaUfUSgPCU7AMR8fuxyrYhQWGZomAKVQK0U5ZSbS7NuERaENyGzvKa1I2xomBm
>> NheByVWYq4e6Sy2R1ibt+g2vJziyCz3hTEY2HCdFaH5wptPK/kwNUlLiJg7v4NyX
>> 7Bh9Q7m55zyj+Ch241C3QN12q4gPVXc4XAPRV6XGIIT6xpj+r/Cr68EDFOfLOqOW
>> fNrnA7y9zaAvX9vG8M8duhLPKC3JdIwskylWndPnezL0P+qpFu/7pE2YHtEmQCBT
>> eZ0HwHUk6og6c32j2kg5mQu4D+Lvdl6Oo1CFX7obCHL0RvmdMDgo+W6sgVk4cxJi
>> mm/rxLAlYUDt7efRf9+L8QbO8LwryZBXqC8ROK+XX7kC0AxSEOY8+3TvN8gPtwLg
>> 2MWZRtpdrz2RONQxvAcl1+g6Mg0K1MvPsAisRESqUSE7gbgN5XYiTvljIGbd4ztW
>> ioeyCgCcK1ka9PWzP2gXyUrEy5Yzl3S96C9sl6MgJf6CmcEOPWmhXP5itogx6OOq
>> fzqj5NXZZp2UY6J5y2tmG5TcVV6idPxUTr+3bcSOrguQqOqL5Wr0hUo92y9nRGM5
>> T01jK/EsZXpSGkOsm4df4Z4N7yFGLUmB8Jbdv+kAIU1HIeqrPHhtLhcoJpqYwqxt
>> Gsods6i0U5ersPLi0IBa
>> =DtbU
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
_______________________________________________
>> infrastructure mailing list
>> infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards
> Mrigesh Pokhrel
> +91 9807585021
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)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=4pFb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
4:46 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hello Mrigresh,
No, not all packages need to get an RFR.
The RFR is only applicable if you want to get a piece of software to run in the Fedora
Infrastructure (like fedorahosted).
If you want to run it on any other server, the RFR makes no sense, as it is a Request For
Fedora Infrastructure Resources.
Regards,
Patrick
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 02:31:11PM +0530, Mrigesh Pokhrel wrote:
Hi Patrick
Packaging I understand. One needs to create a rpm installable
package as well specifying their dependencies. This is the most
basic I am talking about. But I intend to ask, if I create a package
why would I need RFR? Do all packages need RFR? How do I decide that
a package I created needs a RFR? Sorry if it sounds too naive, but I
would like to be clear about it.
Regards,
Mrigesh Pokhrel
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA512
>
>Dear Mrigresh,
>
>As noted on the web page I linked you to, you need to make sure it is packaged BEFORE
you file your RFR: "If your resource requires packages, please make sure that you
create, get approved and have your package(s) available in Fedora and/or EPEL before you
file your RFR ticket.".
>The process for submtting an RFR is also outlined on that webpage.
>
>Regards,
>Patrick
>
>
>On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 12:17:50PM +0530, Mrigesh Pokhrel wrote:
>>Hi Patrick ,
>> Thank, but would submitting a ROR start early in this
>>project , or after the packaging would be done? And in this scenario how
>>would one go on about submitting a ticket for RFR?
>>
>>Regards,
>>Mrigesh
>>
>>
>>On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk
<puiterwijk(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>Hash: SHA512
>>>
>>>Dear Mrigesh,
>>>
>>>I have looked at your GSoC proposal, and would like to notify you of a few
>>>major things you seem to have forgotten:
>>>- - The infrastructure team requires everything that's deployed in the
>>>Fedora infrastructure to be packaged as an RPM, so that we can deploy and
>>>maintain it easily.
>>>- - To get anything hosted in our infrastructure, you will need to submit
>>>an Request For Resources, for this please look
>>>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Request_For_Resources.
>>>- - Please note that the current versions of RHEL (5/6) have Ruby versions
>>>that are too old to run gitlab, so you will have to package them for
>>>Fedora. This might impact the willingness of the Infrastructure team to
>>>host it.
>>>
>>>I think it might be a better target to just get gitlab packaged for Fedora
>>>during the GSoC, as there are a lot of Ruby gems you still need to package.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Patrick Uiterwijk
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 11:59:41PM +0530, Mrigesh Pokhrel wrote:
>>>>Hi,
>>>> I have made my Proposal wiki page[1] for your reference , do
comment
>>>>and review it and help me in improving it as required.
>>>>
>>>>[1]
>>>>
>>>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013/Student_Application_rag3nix/Gitlib
>>>>IRC : rag3nix , rag3
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Thanks and Regards
>>>>Mrigesh Pokhrel
>>>>+91 9807585021
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>infrastructure mailing list
>>>>infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
-----BEGIN PGP
SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)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=31U2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
>>>
>>>iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJRhV8mAAoJEIZXmA2atR5QzsoQAKezXjzVn90Y/zDAJAqz8nUK
>>>Z/AaUfUSgPCU7AMR8fuxyrYhQWGZomAKVQK0U5ZSbS7NuERaENyGzvKa1I2xomBm
>>>NheByVWYq4e6Sy2R1ibt+g2vJziyCz3hTEY2HCdFaH5wptPK/kwNUlLiJg7v4NyX
>>>7Bh9Q7m55zyj+Ch241C3QN12q4gPVXc4XAPRV6XGIIT6xpj+r/Cr68EDFOfLOqOW
>>>fNrnA7y9zaAvX9vG8M8duhLPKC3JdIwskylWndPnezL0P+qpFu/7pE2YHtEmQCBT
>>>eZ0HwHUk6og6c32j2kg5mQu4D+Lvdl6Oo1CFX7obCHL0RvmdMDgo+W6sgVk4cxJi
>>>mm/rxLAlYUDt7efRf9+L8QbO8LwryZBXqC8ROK+XX7kC0AxSEOY8+3TvN8gPtwLg
>>>2MWZRtpdrz2RONQxvAcl1+g6Mg0K1MvPsAisRESqUSE7gbgN5XYiTvljIGbd4ztW
>>>ioeyCgCcK1ka9PWzP2gXyUrEy5Yzl3S96C9sl6MgJf6CmcEOPWmhXP5itogx6OOq
>>>fzqj5NXZZp2UY6J5y2tmG5TcVV6idPxUTr+3bcSOrguQqOqL5Wr0hUo92y9nRGM5
>>>T01jK/EsZXpSGkOsm4df4Z4N7yFGLUmB8Jbdv+kAIU1HIeqrPHhtLhcoJpqYwqxt
>>>Gsods6i0U5ersPLi0IBa
>>>=DtbU
>>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>infrastructure mailing list
>>>infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Thanks and Regards
>>Mrigesh Pokhrel
>>+91 9807585021
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJRhhspAAoJEIZXmA2atR5QQ5wQALa6WIAc0Vd85l7Ey3aAfonJ
>YH+piWDIOqmhcK8HxjRjNg7WUhmJDu0E40e1P0NX9ldP3o3NLVeLl7gIMQVIWWG6
>pwd+Y9TmE6qWCywm99bGIhSPZ/En0DL1UmHAH8rJVZrCxRbnhGv/StgsbmdUTMYI
>9sFXI/S9nyZY3cDgW9EVe+LUIcTwyTeaCKA/a4H/oL32DdDiEk2bR9PHm79R57Qf
>CMNtzCq30/UrCZzVF/WgGrUefcBtRUjNFhEDioVthnjckk952CMBw6JVjC3EnGSa
>3VduCFWp2rrZpaeJUZw+Tc9k6ER6VpKv8LZr8jHqTMtCYhCp24w2ZWoNZDc/D/lT
>7bzK05CUMbBLygEOGizm5cLWy+XBfw+U0Ynv8YxZBqzNCCPI3FfRTdRmMIepkWMR
>XZe3UIe/E3m0LZyvFavy2mUfB4XXAym45cL9H+aAGmoVskruKO+CIs7Q9s4U4pjC
>5zK4nhvzImHIk5C3tsl6OBhq4KvJcLIHrIcFjs2cEHrNrc0sn3KhWr3DgweRo8XN
>hzkWfaetsbKmhmzqk1rZfkaEEnP19B0NQTAEcvt7x3peQtS+WfpRcpBO6IU/8FI2
>YRM3AIfpQpAwkqKJdJ9S1aEI+avSUL3AIfJFsw08VDgY9q4wPXuEXdEMkOSD2ada
>kN05UTJMFy+bieuJPbH+
>=4pFb
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
4008
days inactive
4009
days old
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
13 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Gerard Ryan -
Kevin Fenzi -
Kushal Das -
Mrigesh Pokhrel -
Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk -
Sarup Banskota