On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:05:27 +0400
Станислав Ханжин <hanzhin.stas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Kevin, the real job there is to construct good SELinux policy for
check_mk serverside. Clients are already packaged.
Well, we prefer anything we use if at all possible to be in EPEL.
That way we know:
- The package has passed review and is mostly sane.
- There's a bug tracker so we can report bugs.
- Packages are signed and distributed in a good way.
- Other people are using the same packages so they can report/fix
problems before they happen to us.
Anyhow, check_mk does look interesting... perhaps someone would like to
drive a proposal for using it? ie, can you show us a sample config for
what we do? how it would work with puppet, etc?