redirect f.r.c to fp.o and not the fp.o wiki

[Rahul Sundaram]

Hi

Just a quick reminder that this hasn't been done yet.

Rahul

[Mike McGrath]

Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>  Hi
>
>  Just a quick reminder that this hasn't been done yet. 
I'm working on some web stuff today, I'll make sure this gets done.

    -Mike

[Karsten Wade]

On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 08:36 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>  Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>  > Hi
>  >
>  > Just a quick reminder that this hasn't been done yet.
>  
>  I'm working on some web stuff today, I'll make sure this gets done. 
Did Rahul put in a ticket for this?

Does F-Infra prefer to use tickets? 

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

[Thomas Chung]

On 6/8/07, Karsten Wade <kwade(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 08:36 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>  > Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>  > > Hi
>  > >
>  > > Just a quick reminder that this hasn't been done yet.
>  >
>  > I'm working on some web stuff today, I'll make sure this gets done.
>
>  Did Rahul put in a ticket for this?
>
>  Does F-Infra prefer to use tickets? 
Would that be Bugzilla or OTRS[1] ?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Tickets
Regards,
-- 
Thomas Chung
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasChung

[Marek Mahut]

Thomas Chung wrote:
>  On 6/8/07, Karsten Wade <kwade(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 08:36 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Just a quick reminder that this hasn't been done yet.
> > >
> > > I'm working on some web stuff today, I'll make sure this gets done.
> >
> > Did Rahul put in a ticket for this?
> >
> > Does F-Infra prefer to use tickets?
>  
>  Would that be Bugzilla or OTRS[1] ?
>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Tickets 
IMO, RequestTracker is better for this kinds of ticketing system that otrs.

>  Regards, 

-- 
Marek Mahut                    Tel.: [phone] (ex. 826-2046)
Fedora Ambassador                              GSM: [phone]
http://www.fedoraproject.org                  http://www.jamendo.com
____________________________________________________________________

[Ray Van Dolson]

On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 06:31:25PM +0200, Marek Mahut wrote:
>   Thomas Chung wrote:
>  > On 6/8/07, Karsten Wade <kwade(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  >> On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 08:36 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>  >> > Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>  >> > > Hi
>  >> > >
>  >> > > Just a quick reminder that this hasn't been done yet.
>  >> >
>  >> > I'm working on some web stuff today, I'll make sure this gets
> done.
>  >>
>  >> Did Rahul put in a ticket for this?
>  >>
>  >> Does F-Infra prefer to use tickets?
>  > Would that be Bugzilla or OTRS[1] ?
>  > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Tickets
>  
>   IMO, RequestTracker is better for this kinds of ticketing system that otrs.
>   
There's always Roundup as well:

  http://roundup.sourceforge.net/

I like it because it's very lightweight.  It's also Python which might
be a plus as well.

Ray

[Mike McGrath]

Marek Mahut wrote:
>  IMO, RequestTracker is better for this kinds of ticketing system that 
>  otrs.
>
>  
The problem isn't the tool, the issue is workflow and usage.

    -Mike

[Mike McGrath]

Karsten Wade wrote:
>  On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 08:36 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>    
> > Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >     
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Just a quick reminder that this hasn't been done yet.
> >>       
> > I'm working on some web stuff today, I'll make sure this gets done.
> >     
>
>  Did Rahul put in a ticket for this?
>
>  Does F-Infra prefer to use tickets? 
>     
It goes both ways,  The ticketing system, unfortunately, largely gets 
ignored.  I still question whether we should continue using it or move 
to something else.

    -Mike